%0 Journal Article 
%T Is Quantitative Electromyography Reliable?
%A Francesco Cecere
%A Sabine Ruf
%A Hans Pancherz
%D 1996
%J Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
%R 10.11607/jofph.1038
%P 38-47
%V 10
%N 1
%U {https://www.jofph.com/articles/10.11607/jofph.1038}
%8 1996-03-30
%X <p></p><p><i>The
reliability of quantitative electromyography (EMG) of the masticatory muscles
was investigated in 14 subjects without any signs or symptoms of
temporomandibular disorders. Integrated EMG activity from the anterior
temporalis and masseter muscles was recorded bilaterally by means of bipolar
surface electrodes during chewing and biting activities. In the first
experiment, the influence of electrode relocation was investigated. No
influence of electrode relocation on the recorded EMG signal could be detected.
In a second experiment, three sessions of EMG recordings during five different
chewing and biting activities were performed in the morning (I); 1 hour later
without intermediate removal of the electrodes (II); and in the afternoon,
using new electrodes (III). The method errors for different time intervals
(I-II and I-III errors) for each muscle and each function were calculated.
Depending on the time interval between the EMG recordings, the muscles
considered, and the function performed, the individual errors ranged from 5% to
63%. The method error increased significantly (P &lt; .05 to P &lt; .01) with
the time interval between recordings. The error for the masseter (mean 27.2%)
was higher than for the temporalis (mean 20.0%). The largest function error was
found during maximal biting in intercuspal position (mean 23.1%). Based on the
findings, quantitative electromyography of the masticatory muscles seems to
have a limited value in diagnostics and in the evaluation of individual
treatment results.</i></p>
