Article Data

  • Views 301
  • Dowloads 63

Reviews

Open Access

Scientific Evidence of Occlusion and Craniomandibular Disorders

  • Pentti Kirveskari1,*,
  • Pentti Alanen1

1Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, SF-20520 Turku, Finland

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.07235 Vol.7,Issue 3,September 1993 pp.235-240

Published: 30 September 1993

*Corresponding Author(s): Pentti Kirveskari E-mail:

Abstract

The rejection of the old hypothesis concerning the role of occlusal factors in craniomandibular disorders has been suggested because of the lack of evidence supporting the hypothesis. However, it would be more helpful to seek tests that clearly show that the hypothesis is wrong. Most of the studies used to favor rejection of this hypothesis have incorporated designs precluding any causal conclusions on the role of occlusal factors. Time and resources have been wasted in repeated efforts to obtain what is only associative proof; studies designed to address the causal question are few. There are, as yet, no results clearly warranting the rejection of the hypothesis that occlusal factors are part of a causal complex of craniomandibular disorders.

Cite and Share

Pentti Kirveskari,Pentti Alanen. Scientific Evidence of Occlusion and Craniomandibular Disorders. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 1993. 7(3);235-240.

References

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top