Article Data

  • Views 253
  • Dowloads 61

Original Research

Open Access

Lack of Associations Between Occlusal and Cephalometric Measures, Side Imbalance in Striatal D2 Receptor Binding, and Sleep-Related Oromotor Activities

  • Frank Lobbezoo1,*,
  • Pierre H. Rompré2
  • Jean-Paul Soucy3
  • Cristina Iafrancesco4,5
  • Jack Turkewicz2
  • Jacques Y. Montplaisir6
  • Gilles J. Lavigne2

1Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2Faculté de Médecine Dentaire, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

3Département de Médecine Nucleaire, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada

4Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

5Private Practice in Orthodontics Laval, Québec, Canada

6Centre d’Étude du Sommeil, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montréal, Québec, Canada

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.15106 Vol.15,Issue 1,March 2001 pp.64-71

Published: 30 March 2001

*Corresponding Author(s): Frank Lobbezoo E-mail: f.lobbezoo@acta.nl

Abstract

Aims: First, to evaluate possible orofacial morphologic differences between sleep bruxers and non-bruxers, and second, to determine possible correlations between morphologic factors and striatal D2 receptor expression in persons with sleep-related oromotor activities. Methods: Twenty subjects were included in this study; half of them had polysomnographically confirmed oromotor values above the cutoff points for sleep bruxism. For all participants, 26 standard occlusal measures were recorded clinically and from dental study casts. In addition, 25 standard angular and linear measures were taken from standardized cephalometric films, and variables were derived to evaluate dental and skeletal relationships. Fourteen of the 20 participants had also participated in a previous study that included iodine-123-iodobenzamide (I-123-IBZM) and single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT). For them, the side-to-side difference in striatal D2 receptor binding was determined as the neurochemical outcome measure. Results: Following the classical Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing, no morphologic differences were found between the sleep bruxers and the non-bruxers. In addition, none of the morphologic variables were significantly associated with the neuroimaging data. Conclusion: Taking into account the low power of this retrospective, exploratory study, the results suggest that the orofacial morphology of sleep bruxers does not differ from that of non-bruxers. In addition, morphologic factors are probably not involved in the asymmetry in striatal D2 receptor distribution that was previously observed in association with sleep bruxism.

Keywords

sleep bruxism; iodine-123-iodobenzamide; single-photon emission-computed tomography; dental occlusion; cephalometry

Cite and Share

Frank Lobbezoo,Pierre H. Rompré,Jean-Paul Soucy,Cristina Iafrancesco,Jack Turkewicz,Jacques Y. Montplaisir,Gilles J. Lavigne. Lack of Associations Between Occlusal and Cephalometric Measures, Side Imbalance in Striatal D2 Receptor Binding, and Sleep-Related Oromotor Activities. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2001. 15(1);64-71.

References

1. Attanasio R. An overview of bruxism and its management. Dent Clin North Am 1997;41:229–241.

2. Lobbezoo F, Lavigne GJ. Do bruxism and temporomandibular disorders have a cause-and-effect relationship?J Orofac Pain 1997;11:15–23.

3. Satoh T, Harada Y. Electrophysiological study on tooth grinding during sleep. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973;35:267–275.

4. Thorpy MJ. Parasomnias. In: Thorpy MJ (ed). International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual.Rochester: Allen Press, 1990: 142–185.

5. Macaluso GM, Guerra P, Di Giovanni G, Boselli M, Parrino L, Terzano MG. Sleep bruxism is a disorder related to periodic arousals during sleep. J Dent Res 1998;77:565–573.

6. Lobbezoo F, Soucy JP, Montplaisir JY, Lavigne GJ. Striatal D2 receptor binding in sleep bruxism: A controlled study with iodine-123-iodobenzamide and singlephoton emission-computed tomography. J Dent Res 1996;75:1804–1810.

7. Lobbezoo F, Lavigne GJ, Tanguay R, Montplaisir JY. The effect of the catecholamine precursor L-dopa on sleep bruxism: A controlled clinical trial. Mov Disord 1997;12:73–78.

8. Lavigne GJ, Lobbezoo F, Rompré PH, Nielsen TA, Montplaisir JY. Cigarette smoking as a risk or exacerbating factor for restless legs syndrome and sleep bruxism. Sleep 1997;20:290–293.

9. Madrid S, Vranesh JG, Hicks RA. Cigarette smoking and bruxism. Percept Mot Skills 1998;87:898.

10. Bader G, Lavigne GJ. Sleep bruxism: An overview of an oromandibular sleep movement disorder. Sleep Med Rev 2000;4:27–43.

11. Rugh JD, Harlan J. Nocturnal bruxism and temporomandibular disorders. Adv Neurol 1988;49:329–341.

12. Pierce CJ, Chrisman K, Bennett ME, Close JM. Stress, anticipatory stress, and psychologic measures related to sleep bruxism. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:51–56.

13. Kampe T, Edman G, Bader G, Tagdae T, Karlsson S. Personality traits in a group of subjects with long-standing bruxing behaviour. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:588–593.

14. Major M, Rompré PH, Guitard F, Tenbokum L, O’Connor K, Nielsen T, Lavigne GJ. A controlled daytime challenge of motor performance and vigilance in sleep bruxers. J Dent Res 1999;78:1754–1762.

15. Ramfjord SP. Bruxism: A clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:21–44.

16. Yustin D, Neff P, Rieger MR, Hurst I. Characterization of 86 bruxing patients and long-term study of their management with occlusal devices and other forms of therapy. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:54–60.

17. Rugh JD, Barghi N, Drago CJ. Experimental occlusal discrepancies and nocturnal bruxism. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:548–553.

18. Gomez FM, Areso MP, Giralt MT, Sainz B, Garcia-Vallejo P. Effects of dopaminergic drugs, occlusal disharmonies and chronic stress on non-functional masticatory activity in the rat assessed by incisal attrition. J Dent Res 1998;77:1454–1464.

19. Areso MP, Giralt MT, Sainz B, Prieto M, Garcia-Vallejo P, Gomez FM. Occlusal disharmonies modulate central catecholaminergic activity in the rat. J Dent Res 1999; 78:1204–1213.

20. Lavigne GJ, Rompré PH, Montplaisir JY. Sleep bruxism: Validity of clinical research diagnostic criteria in a controlled polysomnographic study. J Dent Res 1996; 75:546–552.

21. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics St. Louis: Mosby, 1986.

22. Ash M (ed). Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion, ed 6. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984.

23. Solow B, Tallgren A. Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29:591–607.

24. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12(4 suppl):142S–158S.

25. Rakosi T. An Atlas and Manual of Cephalometric Radiography. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1982.

26. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;86:449–469.

27. Owen AH. Diagnostic block cephalometrics: Part 1. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:400–422.

28. Jarabak JR, Fizzell JA. Technique and Treatment with Light-Wire Edgewise Appliances, ed 2. St. Louis: Mosby, 1972.

29. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis of the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

30. Miller VJ, Yoeli Z, Barnea E, Zeltser C. The effect of parafunction on condylar asymmetry in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25: 721–724.

31. Young DV, Rinchuse DJ, Pierce CJ, Zullo T. The craniofacial morphology of bruxers versus nonbruxers. Angle Orthod 1999;69:14–18.

32. Menapace SE, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo T, Pierce CJ, Shnorhokian H. The dentofacial morphology of bruxers versus non-bruxers. Angle Orthod 1994;64:43–52.

33. Waltimo A, Nyström M, Könönen M. Bite force and dentofacial morphology in men with severe dental attrition. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:92–96.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top