Experimental Chewing in Myofascial Pain Patients

Aims: To evaluate the potential capacity of a chewing exercise to differentiate chronic myofascial pain (MFP) patients from healthy controls and to test whether there are distinct pain response differences among MFP patients. Methods: Eighty-nine subjects participated in the study; 49 were diagnosed as belonging to the MFP subgroup of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and had suffered from MFP for at least 6 months, and 40 healthy age- and gender-matched subjects comprised the control group. After completion of a clinical examination, all subjects performed a chewing exercise. Subjects chewed on half a leaf of green casting wax for 9 minutes and then held their jaw at rest for another 9 minutes. They indicated the intensity of the pain experience on a visual analog scale (VAS) every 3 minutes from the beginning (P0) to the end (P18) of the chewing exercise. Only changes in pain report of more than 5 mm on the VAS were considered. Analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to analyze fluctuations in pain levels during the test, with the pain level at baseline (P0) as a covariant. Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant main effect for group (MFP versus control); a significant main effect for activity (chewing versus rest); an interaction between activity and time; and an interaction between activity, time, and group. The latter revealed the significant effect of the chewing activity on pain levels in both groups along the axis of time and its recovery at rest. In the MFP patients, pain had increased by 32 mm at P9 in 84% of the patients and recovered to almost the initial pain levels by P18; 6% reported a decrease in pain sensation and 10%reported no change in pain. In the controls, pain had increased 4.9 mm by P9, a value within the recording error range of the scale. Conclusion: (1) A strenuous chewing exercise is a potentially beneficial tool in the diagnostic process of myofascial pain patients and, if validated, could be incorporated into clinical examinations.(2) The increase in pain intensity following the chewing exercise is typical of most of the MFP group. (3) The phenomenon of pain decrease in a small percentage of MFP patients should be further investigated.

chewing test; myofascial pain; temporomandibular disorders

1. Stohler CS. Muscle-related temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:273–284.

2. Scholte AM, Steenks MH, Bosman F. Characteristic and treatment outcome of diagnostic subgroups of patients with CMD: A retrospective study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:215–220.

3. American Academy of Orofacial Pain, Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis and Management, ed 1. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

4. Stohler CS, Lund JP. Effects of noxious stimulation on the jaw muscles on the sensory experience of volunteer human subjects. In: Stohler CS, Carlson DS (eds). Craniofacial Growth Series. Vol 29: Biological and psychological aspects of orofacial pain. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Center for Human Growth and Development, 1994:55–74.

5. Stohler CS. Clinical perspectives on masticatory and related muscle disorders. In: Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA (eds). Progress in Pain Research and Management. Vol 4: Temporomandibular disorders and related pain conditions. Seattle: IASP Press, 1995:3–29.

6. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, Criteria, Examinations andSpecifications, Critique. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992;6:301–355.

7. Bush FM, Whitehill JM, Martelli MF. Pain assessment in temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 1989;7:137–143.

8. Dao TTT, Lund JP, Lavigne GJ. Pain responses in experimental chewing in myofascial pain patients. J Dent Res 1994;73:1163–1167.

9. Clark GT, Beemsterboer PL, Jacobson R. The effect of sustained submaximal clenching on maximum bite force in myofascial pain dysfunction patients. J Oral Rehabil 1984;11:387–391.

10. Kropmans TJB, Dijkastra PU, Stegenga B, Stewart R, de Bont LGM. Smallest detectable difference in outcome variables related to painful restriction of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 1998;78:784–789.

11. Ekblom A, Hansson P. Pain intensity measurements in patients with acute pain receiving afferent stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:481–486.

12. Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Steenks MH, Faber JAJ, Bosman

F. Diagnostic value of orthopedic tests in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1993;72: 1443–1453.

13. Laskin DM, Block S. Diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:75–83.

14. Roberts CA, Katzberg RW, Tallents RA, Espeland MA, Handelman SL. Correlation of clinical parameters to the arthrographicdepiction of TMJ internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;60:98–105.

15. Molin C. Vertical isometric muscle forces of the mandible. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:485–499.

16. Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Houe L. Muscle pain modulates mastication: An experimental study in humans. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:7–13.

17. Triano JJ, Schultz AB. Correlation of objective measure of trunk motion and muscle function with low-back disability ratings. Spine 1987;12:561–565.

18. Backman E, Bengtsson A, Bengtsson M, Lennmarken C, Henriksson KG. Skeletal muscle function in primary fibromyalgia. Effect of regional sympathetic blockade with guanthidine. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;77:187–191.

19. Stohler CS, Ashton-Miller JA, Carlsson DS. The effect of pain from the mandibular joint and muscles on masticatory motor behavior in man. Arch Oral Biol 1988;33:175–182.

20. Steenks MH, De Wijer A, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Bosman

F. Orthopedic diagnostic tests for temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995:325–350.

21. Cailliet R. Soft Tissue Pain and Disability. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1977:1–2.

22. Solberg WK. Temporomandibular disorders: Physical tests in diagnosis. Br Dent J 1986;160:273–277.