Article Data

  • Views 268
  • Dowloads 45

Original Research

Open Access

Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: Depression, Non-Specific Physical Symptoms, and Graded Chronic Pain

  • Samuel F. Dworkin1,*,
  • Jeffrey Sherman2
  • Lloyd Mancl3
  • Richard Ohrbach4
  • Linda LeResche2
  • Edmond Truelove2

1Departments of Oral Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

2Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

3Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

4Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.16308 Vol.16,Issue 3,September 2002 pp.207-220

Published: 30 September 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): Samuel F. Dworkin E-mail: dworkin@u.washington.edu

Abstract

Aims: To analyze the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain scales comprising the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis II. Methods: Data resulting from independent longitudinal and cross-sectional epidemiological studies as well as randomized clinical trials conducted at the University of Washington and the University at Buffalo were submitted to descriptive, correlational, and inferential statistical analyses to evaluate selected psychometric properties of the RDC/TMD Axis II scales. Results: Analyses of available data from both TMD clinical centers revealed good to excellent reliability, validity, and clinical utility for the Axis II measures of depression, somatization, and graded chronic pain. Specifically, data were presented comparing the RDC/TMD depression scale to the Beck Depression Inventory and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; these data supported concurrent validity of the RDC/TMD measure and its use as a depression screening tool. Its clinical utility lies in its demonstrated usefulness for alerting TMD clinicians to potentially noteworthy depressive symptomatology in TMD patients. Others have shown that elevated somatization, the tendency to report non-specific physical symptoms as noxious or troublesome, is a predictor of poor TMD treatment outcome. The present analyses demonstrated that the RDC/TMD Axis II non-specific physical symptoms scale has acceptable reliability and that severe levels of somatization can potentially confound interpretation of the Axis I clinical examination. The graded chronic pain scale was demonstrated to have clinical utility for tailoring TMD treatment to levels of a patient’s psychosocial adaptation. Conclusion: The major RDC/TMD Axis II measures demonstrate psychometric properties suitable for comprehensive assessment and management of TMD patients.

Keywords

temporomandibular disorders; depression; somatization; chronic pain; RDC/TMD; reliability; validity

Cite and Share

Samuel F. Dworkin,Jeffrey Sherman,Lloyd Mancl,Richard Ohrbach,Linda LeResche,Edmond Truelove. Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: Depression, Non-Specific Physical Symptoms, and Graded Chronic Pain. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2002. 16(3);207-220.

References

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992;6:301–355.

2. Goulet J-P, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP. Jaw pain prevalence among French-speaking Canadians in Quebec and related symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1995;74:1738–1744.

3. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and U.S. TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:240–253.

4. Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, DeLeeuw JRJ, Steenks MH, Bosman F, Buchner R, Olthoff LW. Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders part I: Self-report data and clinical findings. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:24–36.

5. Dworkin SF. Surveying the feasibility of an RDC/TMD-based International TMD Research Consortium [abstract]. J Dent Res 2001;80:55.

6. Garofalo JP, Wesley AL. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Reflection of the physical-psychological interface. APS Bull 1997;May/June:4–16.

7. Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF. Five-year outcomes in TMD: Relationship of changes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables. Pain 1998;74:315–326.

8. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys—Basic Methods. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1971.

9. Reit C. On decision making in endodontics: A study of diagnosis and management of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. Swed Dent J 1986;Suppl 41:1–30.

10. Cronbach LJ, Glaser GC, Handa H, Rajaratna S. The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements. New York: Wiley, 1972:

11. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T. Reliability of clinical measurement in temporomandibular disorders. Clin J Pain 1988;4:89–99.

12. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:574–579.

13. Fleiss JL, Chilton NW. The measurement of interexaminer agreement on periodontal disease. J Periodont Res 1983;18:601–606.

14. Waddell G, Main C, Morris EW, et al. Normality and reliability in clinical assessment of backache. Br Med J 1982;284:1519–1523.

15. Dworkin SF, Sherman JJ. Relying on objective and subjective measures of chronic pain: Guidelines for use and interpretation. In: Turk DC, Melzack R (eds). Handbook of Pain Assessment, ed 3. New York: Guilford Press, 2001:619–638.

16. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Brody MC. Quantification of biomedical findings in chronic pain: Problems and solutions. In: Turk DC, Melzack R (eds). Handbook of Pain Assessment, ed 2. New York: Guilford Press, 1992: 447–472.

17. Rudy TE. Psychophysiological assessment in chronic orofacial pain. Anesth Prog 1990;37:82–87.

18. Clark JP, Flack VF. Reproducibility of examiner performance for muscle and joint palpation in the temporomandibular system following training and calibration. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:72–77.

19. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Manual for Administration and Scoring of the MMPI. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems,1983.

20. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–571.

21. Turk DC, Rudy TE. The robustness of an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients. Pain 1990;43:27–35.

22. Derogatis LR, Cleary PA. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. J Clin Psychol 1997;33(4):981–989.

23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

24. Gatchel RJ, Garofalo JP, Ellis E, Holt C. Major psychological disorders in acute and chronic TMD: An initial examination. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1365–1374.

25. Bonica JJ. Basic principles in managing chronic pain. Arch Surg 1977;112:783–788.

26. Von Korff M, LeResche L, Dworkin SF. First onset of common pain symptoms: A prospective study of depression as a risk factor. Pain 1993;53:251–258.

27. Dworkin SF, Massoth DL. Temporomandibular disorders and chronic pain: Disease or illness? J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:29–38.

28. Turk DC. Strategies for classifying chronic orofacial pain patients. Anesth Prog 1990;37:155–160.

29. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: Clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:273–281.

30. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, LeResche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988;32:173–183.

31. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Wilson L, et al. Brief group cognitive-behavioral intervention for temporomandibular disorders. Pain 1994;59:175–187.

32. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain (in press).

33. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, Wilson L, et al. A randomized clinical trial using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care TMD treatment program. J Orofac Pain 2002:16(1):48–63.

34. Huggins KH, Truelove EL, Dworkin SF, Mancl L, Sommers E, LeResche L. RCT of splints for TMD: Clinical findings at 12 months [abstract 1491]. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):292

35. Radloff L. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:3385–3401.

36. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

37. Bandura A. Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215.

38. Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF, Truelove E. Domains of measurement in chronic TMD pain: Psychometric properties [abstract]. J Dent Res 1999;78:292.

39. Wilson L, Dworkin SF, Whitney C, LeResche L. Somatization and pain dispersion in chronic temporomandibular pain. Pain 1994;57:55–61.

40. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, Wilson L, et al. A randomized clinical trial using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care treatment program. J Orofac Pain 2002;16(1):48–63.

41. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Oakley ME, Flack V. Predicting response to treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992;6:161–169.

42. Rollman GB, Lautenbacher S. Sex differences in musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2001;17:20–24.

43. Jones D, Rollman GB, Brooke RI. The cortisol response to psychological stress in temporomandibular dysfunction. Pain 1997;72:171–182.

44. Maixner W, Fillingim R, Kincaid S, Sigurdsson A, Harris

B. Relationship between pain sensitivity and resting arterial blood pressure in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders. Psychosom Med 1997;59:503–511.

45. McDermid AJ, Rollman GB, McCain GA. Generalized hypervigilance in fibromyalgia: Evidence of perceptual amplification. Pain 1996;66:133–144.

46. International Headache Society Classification Committee. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8(Suppl 7):1–96.

47. Solomon S. Diagnosis of primary headache disorders. Validation of the International Headache Society criteria in clinical practice. Neurol Clin 1997;15(1):15–26.

48. International Association for the Study of Pain Subcommittee on Taxonomy, Merskey H. Classification of chronic pain: Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Pain 1986;(Suppl 3):S1–S225.

49. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33(2): 160–172.

50. Von Korff M. Pain management in primary care: An individualized stepped-care approach. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychosocial Factors in Pain: Evolution and Revolution. New York: Guilford Publications, 1999:360–373.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top