Article Data

  • Views 287
  • Dowloads 24

Original Research

Open Access

A Comparison Between Masticatory Muscle Pain Patients and Intracapsular Pain Patients on Behavioral and Psychosocial Domains

  • John E. Lindroth1,*,
  • John E. Schmidt2
  • Charles R. Carlson2

1Orofacial Pain Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

2Department of Psychology, Orofacial Pain Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.16402 Vol.16,Issue 4,December 2002 pp.277-283

Published: 30 December 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): John E. Lindroth E-mail: jlind1@pop.uky.edu

Abstract

Aims: To identify differences between 2 groups of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), those with masticatory muscle pain (MMP) versus intracapsular pain (ICP), and to compare these differences on behavioral and psychosocial domains. Methods: There were 435 patients in the MMP group and 139 patients in the ICP group. The overall sample was 88.2% female and had an average age of 36.1 years (SD = 11.7). Patients completed measures of psychological symptoms (SCL-90), pain severity (MPI), sleep (PSQI), activity (MBI), and life stressors (PCL). Heart rate and blood pressure were also measured, and a complete medical/dental history was taken for each patient. Results: Results indicated no significant difference in pain severity or duration between the 2 groups (P > .05). The ICP group, however, reported fewer affective symptoms of pain than the MMP group (t = 6.8, P = .01). The ICP group had twice as many adaptive copers as dysfunctional patients (x2 = 7.84, P < .01), while there was no significant difference between these 2 categories for the MMP group (P > .05). Finally, the ICP group reported fewer psychological symptoms (P < .05), better sleep quality (F = 7.54, P = .01), and fewer life stressors (F = 7.00, P = .01) than the MMP group. Conclusion: In contrast to many previous studies, the data set in this study showed no differences in pain severity and duration between the MMP and the ICP groups. Even though pain severity levels were equivalent, the MMP diagnostic group of chronic TMD patients demonstrated more dysfunctional behavioral profiles and significantly higher psychological distress than the ICP subgroup.

Keywords

pain; myofascial pain; masticatory muscle pain; intracapsular pain; psychosocial issues

Cite and Share

John E. Lindroth,John E. Schmidt,Charles R. Carlson. A Comparison Between Masticatory Muscle Pain Patients and Intracapsular Pain Patients on Behavioral and Psychosocial Domains. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2002. 16(4);277-283.

References

1. Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:11–12.

2. Jamison RN, Rudy TE, Penzien DB, Mosley TH Jr. Cognitive-behavioral classifications of chronic pain: Replication and extension of empirically derived patient profiles. Pain 1994;57:277–292.

3. Turk DC, Rudy TE, Kubinski JA, Hussein SZ, Greco CM. Dysfunctional patients with temporomandibular disorders: Evaluating the efficacy of a tailored treatment protocol. J Consult Clin Psych 1996;64(1):139–146.

4. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992:6:301–355.

5. Carlson CR, Reid KI, Curran SL, et al. Psychological and physiological parameters of masticatory muscle pain. Pain 1998;76:297–307.

6. Korszun A, Hinderstein B, Wong M. Comorbidity of depression with chronic facial pain and temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol Endod 1996;82:496–500.

7. Epker J, Gatchel RJ. Coping profile differences in the biopsychosocial functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorder. Psychosom Med 2000;62:69–75.

8. Dahlstrom L, Widmark G, Carlsson SG. Cognitive-behavioral profiles among different categories of orofacial pain patients: Diagnostic and treatment implications. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:377–383.

9. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Merril RL, Flack V, Oakley ME. Psychological distress and diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients. Pain 1991;44:29–34.

10. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differential treatment responses of TMD patients as a function of psychological characteristics. Pain 1995;61:103–112.

11. Carlson CR, Bertrand PM, Ehrlich AD, Maxwell AW, Burton RG. Physical self-regulation training for the management of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:47–55.

12. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Wilson L, et al. Brief group cognitive-behavioral intervention for temporomandibular disorders. Pain 1994;59:175–187.

13. Parker MW, Holmes EK, Terezhalmy GT. Personality characteristics of patients with temporomandibular disorders: Diagnostics and therapeutic implications. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:337–344.

14. Derogatis LR. Symptom Checklist-90-R. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems, 1979.

15. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213.

16. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985;23:345–356.

17. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA. Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther 1996;34:669–673.

18. Baecke JAH, Burema J, Frijters JER. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nut 1982;36:936–942.

19. Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Psychosom Res 1998;45:5–13.

20. Pols MA, Peeters PHM, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, et al. Validity and repeatability of a modified baecke questionnaire on physical activity. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24: 381–387.

21. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1979;1:277–299.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top