Acute Oral Pain Intensity and Pain Threshold Assessed by Intensity Matching to Pain Induced by Electrical Stimuli

Aims: To investigate a recently developed pain-intensity matching device (Painmatcher) in terms of reproducibility, pain intensity, and unpleasantness experienced by healthy individuals upon pain threshold assessment, as well as differences in pain threshold between genders and between healthy individuals and patients with acute oral pain, and the relation between pain-intensity assessments by the Painmatcher and a visual analog scale (VAS) in the patients. Methods: Forty healthy individuals and 28 patients with acute oral pain participated. The Painmatcher produces an eventually noxious stimulus by increasing electrical impulses between 2 fingers. Pain thresholds were assessed twice in the healthy individuals and the provoked pain intensity and unpleas-antness were recorded on a VAS. In the patients, pain threshold and ongoing pain were assessed with the Painmatcher and the ongoing pain was recorded on a VAS. Results: Painmatcher scores for the 2 pain threshold assessments were equally correlated in the healthy individuals and patients. VAS scores for ongoing pain and pain caused by the Painmatcher when the ongoing pain intensity was assessed were positively correlated. In the healthy individuals, the degree of unpleasantness was higher than the pain intensity at the pain threshold. The patients had a lower pain threshold than the healthy individuals. Conclusion: This study indicates that patients with acute oral pain have lower Painmatcher pain thresh-olds than healthy individuals, suggesting a general decrease in nociceptive thresholds in these patients. The Painmatcher seems to be as valid as a VAS for acute oral pain assessment. The Painmatcher pain threshold is highly reproducible but associated with unpleasantness.

facial pain; pain; pain measurement; pain threshold; visual analog scale

1. Sessle BJ. The neural basis of temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscle pain. J Orofac Pain 1999;13: 238–245.

2. Merskey H, Lindblom U, Mumford JM, Sunderland S. Part III; Pain terms. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds). Classification of Chronic Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994:204–213.

3. Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Kincaid S, Sigurdsson A, Harris MB. Pain sensitivity in patients with temporomandibular disorders: Relationship to clinical and psychosocial fac-tors. Clin J Pain 1996;12:260–269.

4. Maixner W, Fillingim R, Sigurdsson A, Kincaid S, Silva S. Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain: Evidence for altered temporal summation of pain. Pain 1998;76:71–81.

5. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117–126.

6. Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 1993;55:195–203.

7. Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2000;16:22–28.

8. Babul N, Darke AC, Johnson DH, Charron-Vincent K. Using memory for pain in analgesic research. Ann Pharmacother 1993;27:9–12.

9. Breme K, Altmeppen J, Taeger K. Wie zuverlassig ist unser Gedachtnis fur akute postoperative Schmerzen? Vergleich der retrospektiven Schmerzeinschatzung mit den Aufzeichnungen wahrend postoperativer PCA. Anaesthesist 2000;49:18–24.

10. Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:279–283.

11. Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 1994;13: 2437–2453.

12. O’Driscoll SL, Jayson MI. The clinical significance of pain threshold measurements. Rheumatol Rehabil 1982;21: 31–35.

13. Leffler AS, Hansson P, Kosek E. Somatosensory percep-tion in a remote pain-free area and function of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in patients suffering from long-term trapezius myalgia. Eur J Pain 2002;6: 149–159.

14. Leffler AS, Kosek E, Lerndal T, Nordmark B, Hansson P. Somatosensory perception and function of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Pain 2002;6:161–176.

15. Maixner W, Fillingim R, Booker D, Sigurdsson A. Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain. Pain 1995;63: 341–351.

16. Moller AR, Pinkerton T. Temporal integration of pain from electrical stimulation of the skin. Neurol Res 1997; 19:481–488.

17. Langemark M, Jensen K, Jensen TS, Olesen J. Pressure pain thresholds and thermal nociceptive thresholds in chronic tension-type headache. Pain 1989;38:203–210.

18. Kashima K, Rahman OI, Sakoda S, Shiba R. Increased pain sensitivity of the upper extremities of TMD patients with myalgia to experimentally-evoked noxious stimulation: Possibility of worsened endogenous opioid systems. Cranio 1999;17:241–246.

19. Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P. Sensory dysfunction in fibromyalgia patients with implications for pathogenic mechanisms. Pain 1996;68:375–383.

20. Eliav E, Gracely RH. Sensory changes in the territory of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following lower third molar extraction. Pain 1998;77:191–199.

21. Le Bars D, Dickenson AH, Besson JM. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). I. Effects on dorsal horn convergent neurones in the rat. Pain 1979;6:283–304.

22. Le Bars D, Dickenson AH, Besson JM. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). II. Lack of effect on non-convergent neurones, supraspinal involvement and theoretical implications. Pain 1979;6:305–327.

23. Dickenson AH, Le Bars D, Besson JM. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). Effects on trigeminal nucleus caudalis neurones in the rat. Brain Res 1980;200: 293–305.

24. Fredriksson L, Alstergren P, Kopp S. Absolute and relative facial pressure-pain thresholds in healthy individuals. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:98–104.

25. Edwards RR, Fillingim RB, Yamauchi S, et al. Effects of gender and acute dental pain on thermal pain responses. Clin J Pain 1999;15:233–237.

26. Lautenbacher S, Rollman GB. Sex differences in respon-siveness to painful and non-painful stimuli are dependent upon the stimulation method. Pain 1993;53:255–264.

27. Rainville P, Feine JS, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. A psychophysical comparison of sensory and affective responses to four modalities of experimental pain. Somatosens Mot Res 1992;9:265–277.

28. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.