Mechanical Response of the Porcine Temporomandibular Joint Disc to an Impact Event and Repeated Tensile Loading

Aims: To test for orthotropy in the stress-strain behavior of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc under repeated physiologic loading before and after an impact event. Methods: Two groups, each consisting of 10 discs, were subjected to repeated tensile cycling in the dorsoventral (group 1) and mediolateral (group 3) direction. Two additional groups, each consisting of 10 discs, had preconditioning in the form of a 1.18 N·s impulsive load before tensile cycling in either the dorsoventral (group 2) or mediolateral (group 4) direction. Physiologic loads of 1 to 3 N were cycled at 0.1 Hz, and stress-strain responses were recorded every cycle between 1 to 10 cycles, and then periodically at 50, 100, 500, 750, and 1,000 cycles. The properties of elastic modulus, residual strain upon unloading, and area contained within the hysteresis loop were measured. Results: Dorsoventral loading produced 5-fold higher elastic modulus, 5-fold lower residual strain, and 5-fold lower hysteresis compared to mediolateral tensile loading (P ≤ .001). Repeated loading effectively reduced the viscous response for all discs, as the elastic modulus increased while residual strain and hysteresis decreased. Impulsive loading caused elastic modulus to increase for dorsoventrally cycled discs, whereas hysteresis decreased for mediolaterally cycled discs (P ≤ .05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that damage from the impact load may have increased the porosity of the extracellular matrix, which ultimately resulted in additional stress transfer to the collagen fibers during loading. Impulsive loads may be an important preconditioning factor in the fatigue failure of the TMJ disc in vivo.

fatigue; TMJ disc; cartilage; viscoelasticity; stress-strain

1. Peyron J. Review of the main epidemiologic-etiologic evidence that implies mechanical forces as factors in osteoarthritis. Eng Med 1986;15:77–79.

2. Freeman MAR, Meachim G. Aging and degeneration. In: Freeman MAR (ed). Adult Articular Cartilage, ed 2. London: Pitman Medical, 1979.

3. Kreutziger KL, Mahan PE. Temporomandibular degenerative joint disease. Part I. Anatomy, pathophysiology, and clinical description. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;40:165–182.

4. Radin EL, Paul IL, Rose RM. Role of mechanical factors in pathogenesis of primary osteoarthritis. Lancet 1972;1: 519–522.

5. Harkins ST, Marteney JL. Extrinsic trauma: A significant precipitating factor in temporomandibular dysfunction. Comparative Radiography 1985;54:271–273.

6. Stegenga B, de Bont LGM, Boering G. Osteoarthrosis as the cause of craniomandibular pain and dysfunction: A unifying concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:249–256.

7. Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Feely DE, Stormberg KD, Beatty MW. The effect of disc thickness and trauma on disc surface friction in the porcine temporomandibular joint. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:155–162.

8. Chen CT, Burton-Wurster N, Lust G, Bank RA, Takoppele JM. Compositional and metabolic changes in damaged cartilage are peak-stress, stress-rate and loading-duration dependent. J Orthop Res 1999;17:870–879.

9. Clements KM, Bee ZC, Crossingham GV, Adams MA, Sharif M. How severe must repetitive loading be to kill chondrocytes in articular cartilage? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:499–507.

10. Ewers BJ, Dvoracek-Driksna D, Orth MW, Haut RC. The extent of matrix damage and chondrocyte death in mechanically traumatized articular cartilage explants depends on rate of loading. J Orthop Res 2001;19:779–784.

11. Hylander WL. Mandibular function and temporo-mandibular joint loading. In: Carlson DS, McNamara JA, Ribbens KA (eds). Developmental Aspects of Temporo-mandibular Joint Disorders. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1984:19–35.

12. Smith DM, McLachlan KR, McCall WD. A numerical model of temporomandibular joint loading. J Dent Res 1986;65:1046–1052.

13. Nickel JC, McLachlan KR, Smith DM. A theoretical model of loading and eminence development of the postnatal human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 1988;67:903–910.

14. Nickel JC, McLachlan KR. In vitro measurement of the stress distribution properties of the pig temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:439–448.

15. Nickel JC, McLachlan KR. In vitro measurement of the frictional properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:323–331.

16. Mills DK, Fiandaca DJ, Scapino RP. Morphologic, microscopic, and immunohistochemical investigations into the function of the primate TMJ disc. J Orofac Pain 1994;8: 136–154.

17. Beatty MW, Bruno MJ, Iwasaki LR, Nickel JC. Strain rate-dependent orthotropic properties of the pristine and impulsively loaded porcine temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;57:25–34.

18. Tait DC. Impulsive and Static Loading of the Porcine Temporomandibular Joint Disc [thesis]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 1993.

19. McCutchen CW. Joint lubrication. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 1983;43:118–129.

20. McCormack T, Mansour JM. Reduction in tensile strength of cartilage precedes surface damage under repeated compressive loading in vitro. J Biomech 1997;31:55–61.

21. Kuboki T, Shinoda M, Orsini MG, Yamashita A. Viscoelastic properties of the pig temporomandibular joint articular soft tissues of the condyle and disc. J Dent Res 1997;76:1760–1769.

22. Iwasaki LR, Nickel JC, McLachlan KR. Relationship between growth, function and stress in the temporo-mandibular joint. In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:125–136.

23. Tanaka E, Tanne K, Sakuda M. A three-dimensional finite element model of the mandible including the TMJ and its application to stress analysis in the TMJ during clenching. Med Eng Phys 1994;16:316–322.

24. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, ed 2. San Francisco: WH Freeman, 1981:245,251–252,321–344.

25. Lee ET. Statistical methods for survival data analysis. New York: Wiley, 1992.