Article Data

  • Views 321
  • Dowloads 21

Original Research

Open Access

Analgesic Efficacy of Low-Dose Diclofenac Versus Paracetamol and Placebo in Postoperative Dental Pain

  • Florian Kubitzek1
  • Gabrielle Ziegler2
  • Morris S. Gold3
  • Jiun-Min-H. Liu3
  • Elisabeta Ionescu3,*,

1Dental Surgery Practice, München, Germany

2Medical Director Clinical Research and Development of Pharmaceuticals, Morge, Switzerland

3Novartis Consumer Health, Summit, New Jersey

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.17237 Vol.17,Issue 3,September 2003 pp.237-244

Published: 30 September 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): Elisabeta Ionescu E-mail: daniele.talbot@ch.novartis.com

Abstract

Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of diclofenac-K (12.5 mg) vs paracetamol (500 mg) and placebo given in a flexible dosage regimen to treat pain resulting from extraction of impacted third molar teeth. Methods: This was a 2-day, double-blind, dou-ble-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of diclofenac-K (12.5 mg) tablets vs paracetamol (500 mg) tablets and placebo in patients with moderate or severe pain within 8 hours of extraction of impacted third molars. Results: After the first 2-tablet dose, patients took on average 2.5 additional tablets of diclofenac-K or 2.4 tablets of paracetamol, almost all as 1-tablet doses. Most placebo patients discontinued by taking rescue medication (ibuprofen 200 mg) on the first day. Pain relief after the initial dose of diclofenac-K (2 × 12.5 mg) was superior to placebo (P < .01 for all efficacy outcomes) and comparable to paracetamol (2 × 500 mg). About 30% of patients in each active treatment group took rescue medication during the study, com-pared to 78% on placebo. About 70% in each active treatment group considered the overall pain relief to be “some,” “a lot,” or “complete” compared to only 15% on placebo. The incidence of adverse events in each active treatment group was low and compa-rable between the treatments. Conclusion: An initial double-dose of diclofenac-K (2 × 12.5 mg) or paracetamol (2 × 500 mg) ade-quately relieved the most intense postoperative pain, and the flexi-ble multiple dose regimen (1 or 2 tablets) maintained adequate pain relief thereafter. Most patients needed only 1-tablet doses fol-lowing the initial 2-tablet dose.

Keywords

diclofenac; paracetamol; dental pain; flexible dosage regimen; analgesia

Cite and Share

Florian Kubitzek,Gabrielle Ziegler,Morris S. Gold,Jiun-Min-H. Liu,Elisabeta Ionescu. Analgesic Efficacy of Low-Dose Diclofenac Versus Paracetamol and Placebo in Postoperative Dental Pain . Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2003. 17(3);237-244.

References

1. Cooper SA. Models for clinical assessment of oral analgesics. Am J Med 1983;75:24–29.

2. Moore A, Collins S, Carroll D, McQuay H. Paracetamol with and without codeine in acute pain: A quantitative sytematic review. Pain 1997;70:193–201.

3. Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: A qualitative review. Br J Anaesthesia 2002;88:199–214.

4. Olson NZ, Otero AM, Marrero I, et al. Onset of analgesia for Liquigel ibuprofen 400 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg, ketoprofen 25 mg and placebo in the treatment of postoperative dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 2001;41:1238–1247.

5. Malmstrom K, Daniels S, Kotey P, Seidenberg BC, Desjardins PJ. Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in post-operative dental pain: A randomized placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial. Clin Ther 1999;21:1653–1662.

6. Morrison BW, Fricke J, Brown J, Yuan W, Kotey P, Mehlisch D. The optimal analgesic dose of rofecoxib: Overview of six randomized controlled clinical trials. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1729-1737.

7. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ, Wiffen PJ, Edwards JE. Single dose oral ibuprofen and diclofenac for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002.

8. Seymour RA, Walton JG. Pain control after third molar surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1984;13:457–485.

9. Cook RJ, Sacket DL. The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. Br Med J 1995;310:452–454.

10. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986: 156–158.

11. Preshaw PM, Meechan JG, Dodd MD. Self-medication for the control of dental pain: What are our patients taking?Dental Update 1994;21:299–301.

12. Szmyd L, Shannon IL, Mohnac AM. Control of postoperative sequelae in impacted third molar surgery. J Oral Ther Pharmacol 1965;1:491–496.

13. Seymour RA, Blair GS, Wyatt FAR. Post-operative dental pain and analgesic efficacy. Br J Oral Surg 1983;21: 290–297.

14. Seymour RA, Walton JG. Pain control after third molar surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1984;13:457–485.

15. Henry D, Lim L, Garcia Rodriguez LA, et al. Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Results of a collaborative meta-analysis. Br Med J 1996;312:1563–1567.

16. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Cattaruzzi C, Troncon MG, Agostinis L. Risk of hospitalization for upper gastroin-testinal tract bleeding associated with ketorelac, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcium antagonists, and other antihypertensive drugs. Arch Intern Med 1998;338:727–734.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top