Article Data

  • Views 289
  • Dowloads 28

Original Research

Open Access

Pressure Pain Thresholds in the Craniofacial Region of Female Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Lars Fredriksson1,*,
  • Per Alstergren1
  • Sigvard Kopp1

1Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.17326 Vol.17,Issue 4,December 2003 pp.326-332

Published: 30 December 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): Lars Fredriksson E-mail: lars.fredriksson@ofa.ki.se

Abstract

Aims: To determine the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pressure pain threshold (PPT) in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and TMJ involvement in comparison with healthy females, in order to determine its clinical usefulness for local pain assessment. Methods: Forty-two female patients with the diagnosis of RA, 17 of them positive and 25 negative for rheumatoid factor were inves-tigated, as well as 17 healthy females. A pressure algometer was used to assess the PPT over the TMJ and (as a reference) the cen-ter of the glabella. The mean of the second and third TMJ PPT was used in the analysis, and the ratio between the TMJ PPT and the PPT of the reference site (PPT ratio) was calculated. Temporo-mandibular joint resting pain and pain upon maximum voluntary mouth opening was assessed by a visual analog scale on each side. Results: The TMJ PPT (median/10th to 90th percentile) and PPT ratio were significantly lower in the RA patients (148/64 to 220 and 0.63/0.40 to 1.01, respectively) than in the healthy individuals (217/111 to 352 and 0.85/0.51 to 1.25), but the overlap was con-siderable. Conclusion: This study shows that the PPT of the TMJ in RA patients is lower than in healthy individuals and that it can be used for pain assessment. However, the clinical use of the TMJ PPT and PPT ratio measurements alone is limited from a diagnos-tic point of view.

Keywords

pain; pain threshold; pressure; rheumatoid arthritis; temporomandibular joint

Cite and Share

Lars Fredriksson,Per Alstergren,Sigvard Kopp. Pressure Pain Thresholds in the Craniofacial Region of Female Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2003. 17(4);326-332.

References

1. List T, Helkimo M, Karlsson R. Influence of pressure rates on the reliability of a pressure threshold meter. J Cranio-mandib Disord 1991;5:173–178.

2. Chung SC, Um BY, Kim HS. Evaluation of pressure pain threshold in head and neck muscles by electronic algometer: Intrarater and interrater reliability. Cranio 1992;10: 28–34.

3. Chung SC, Kim JH, Kim HS. Reliability and validity of the pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the TMJ capsules by electronic algometer. Cranio 1993;11:171–176.

4. Fredriksson L, Alstergren P, Kopp S. Absolute and relative facial pressure-pain thresholds in healthy individuals. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:98–104.

5. Tegelberg Å, Kopp S. Subjective symptoms from the stom-atognathic system in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthrosis. Swed Dent J 1987;11:11–22.

6. Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G, Cervini C. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol 1998;27 (suppl 1):S18–S24.

7. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31:315–324.

8. Isselee H, De Laat A, Lesaffre E, Lysens R. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom-free subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:583–587.

9. Nussbaum EL, Downes L. Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days. Phys Ther 1998;78:160–169.

10. Gerecz-Simon EM, Tunks ER, Heale JA, Kean WF, Buchanan WW. Measurement of pain threshold in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and healthy controls. Clin Rheumatol 1989;8:467–474.

11. Dhondt W, Willaeys T, Verbruggen LA, Oostendorp RA, Duquet W. Pain threshold in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and effect of manual oscillations. Scand J Rheumatol 1999;28:88–93.

12. Leffler AS, Kosek E, Lerndal T, Nordmark B, Hansson P. Somatosensory perception and function of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Pain 2002;6:161–176.

13. Huskisson EC, Hart FD. Pain threshold and arthritis. Br Med J 1972;4:193–195.

14. Schaible HG, Schmidt RF, Willis WD. Convergent inputs from articular, cutaneous and muscle receptors onto ascending tract cells in the cat spinal cord. Exp Brain Res 1987;66:479–488.

15. Yu XM, Mense S. Response properties and descending control of rat dorsal horn neurons with deep receptive fields. Neuroscience 1990;39:823–831.

16. Sessle BJ. The neural basis of temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscle pain. J Orofac Pain 1999;13: 238–245.

17. Jensen K. Quantification of tenderness by palpation and use of pressure algometers. In: Fricton JR, Awad E (eds). Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, vol 17. New York: Raven Press, 1990:165–182.

18. Kopp S, Alstergren P. Blood serotonin and joint pain in seropositive versus seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm 2002;11:211–217.

19. Kopp S, Wenneberg B. Intra- and interobserver variability in the assessment of signs of disorder in the stomatog-nathic system. Swed Dent J 1983;7:239–246.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top