Self-registration of Mandibular Opening Capacity and Vertical Overbite. A Method Study

Aims: To evaluate a method for self-registration of maximum mandibular opening capacity by means of a spatula and estima-tion of vertical overbite from photos. Methods: The study group consisted of 50 adults. Each participant received written instruc-tions, photos, a measuring spatula, and a pencil. The first task was to register maximum interincisal distance. The participant opened up his or her mouth as wide as possible, looked in a mirror, and marked the distance on the spatula. The second task was to esti-mate the vertical overbite in the intercuspal position. A clinician then estimated the type of overbite and measured the maximum interincisal distance and the vertical overbite with a ruler in mil-limeters. Results: The normal overbites showed a mean value of 2.4 mm, and a standard value of 2 mm was set. The deep bites showed a mean value of 5.2 mm, and a standard value of 5 mm was set. The standard overbite value, added to the value measured on the spatula, was compared with the clinical values made by the clinician for maximum mandibular opening. The limits of agree-ment for 95% of the mean difference were –4.2 mm and 4.4 mm. Six people missed the correct diagnosis for the vertical overbite. Conclusion: The self-registration method of measuring maximum mandibular opening capacity seems valid for studying major dif-ferences in opening capacity when clinical measurements are not possible to perform.

craniomandibular disorders; mandibular opening; repeatability for measurements; self-registration; temporomandibular joint; vertical overbite

1. Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark I. Changes in subjective symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in children and adolescents during a 10-year period. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:76–82.

2. Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. A longitudinal epidemiologic study of signs and symptoms of temporo-mandibular disorders from 15 to 35 years of age. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:310–319.

3. Shaw WC. Mandibular function and dysfunction. In: Hill J (ed). Orthodontics and Occlusal Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:250–268.

4. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1974;67:101–121.

5. Wänman A. Craniomandibular disorders in adolescents [thesis]. Swed Dent J 1987;44(suppl):1–342.

6. Agerberg G. Maximal mandibular movements in young men and women. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1974;67:81–100.

7. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T. Reliability of clinical measurements in temporomandibular disorders. Clin J Pain 1988;4:89–99.

8. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:574–579.

9. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: Reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42–51.

10. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF, Liu C. The reproducibility of muscle and joint tenderness detection methods and maximum mandibular movement measurement for the temporomandibular system. J Orofac Pain 1998;12: 17–26.

11. Fridrich KL, Fridrich HH, Kempf KK, Moline DO. Dental implications in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. A case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:431–435.

12. Goodman RM, Allison ML. Chronic temporomandibular joint subluxation in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Report of a case. J Oral Surg 1969;27:659–661.

13. Thexton A. A case of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome presenting with recurrent dislocation of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Surg 1965;2:190–193.

14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996; 313:744–753.

15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–310.

16. Sall J, Lehman A. JMP Start Statistics. A Guide to Statistics and Data Analysing Using JMP and JMP IN Software. Belmont: Duxbury Press, 1996.

17. Carlsson GE, Egermark-Eriksson I, Magnusson TM. Intra-and inter-observer variation in functional examination of the masticatory system. Swed Dent J 1980;4:187–194.

18. Kopp S, Wenneberg B. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of signs of disorder in the stomatognatic system. Swed Dent J 1983;7:239–246.

19. Rivera-Morales WC, Goldman BM, Jackson RS. Simplified technique to measure mandibular range of motion. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:56–59.

20. Henrikson T. Temporomandibular disorders and mandibular function in relation to class II malocclusion and orthodontic treatment. A controlled, prospective and longitudinal study [thesis]. Swed Dent J 1999;134(suppl): 5–144.

21. Salonen L, Mohlin B, Götzlinger B, Helldén L. Need and demand for orthodontic treatment in an adult Swedish populatio. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:359–368.