Article Data

  • Views 330
  • Dowloads 32

Original Research

Open Access

Complementary and Alternative Therapy Use by Patients with Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders

  • Karen G. Raphael1,2,*,
  • Jack J. Klausner2
  • Sangeetha Nayak1
  • Joseph J. Marbach1,2

1New Jersey Medical School: Department of Psychiatry, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey

2Department of Oral Pathology, Biology, and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.1736 Vol.17,Issue 1,March 2003 pp.36-41

Published: 30 March 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): Karen G. Raphael E-mail: raphaekg@umdnj.edu

Abstract

Aims: To examine the prevalence and predictors of complemen-tary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), prior to their first treat-ment with an intraoral splint. Methods: Sixty-three women with a diagnosis of myofascial TMD, and who had never been prescribed an intraoral appliance, reported on their use of CAM and other treatments for their facial pain. In addition to providing a compre-hensive symptom history, participants completed a 2-week daily diary in which they described the nature of daily efforts to reduce their facial pain. Results: Although more than half of all partici-pants had not sought any prior treatment for their facial pain, 22.2% had received CAM treatment. The only single type of treat-ment more commonly used than CAM treatment was medication (28.6%). The most common type of CAM treatment was relax-ation therapy (12.7%), followed by chiropractic treatment (9.5%). Although pain duration, pain severity, or mood did not predict CAM use, users were significantly more likely to report work or social disability associated with their facial pain and were more likely to report onset associated with an accident. CAM users were more likely than non-users to employ multiple pain reduction strategies over the 2-week daily diary report, including prescrip-tion medication use. Conclusion: A sizeable minority of women with myofascial TMD report CAM treatment for their pain, even prior to an initial treatment with an intraoral splint. Since empiri-cal reports have not adequately demonstrated their safety or effi-cacy, there is a need for controlled clinical trials evaluating the utility of CAM treatments for TMD.

Keywords

temporomandibular disorders; myofascial pain; complementary and alternative medicine; care-seeking

Cite and Share

Karen G. Raphael,Jack J. Klausner,Sangeetha Nayak,Joseph J. Marbach. Complementary and Alternative Therapy Use by Patients with Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2003. 17(1);36-41.

References

1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280: 1569–1575.

2. Fairfield KM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Libman H, Phillips RS. Patterns of use, expenditures, and perceived efficacy of complementary and alternative therapies in HIV-infected patients. Arch Intern Med 1998;158: 2257–2264.

3. Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, et al. Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:262–268.

4. Morris KT, Johnson N, Homer L, Walts D. A comparison of complementary therapy use between breast cancer patients and patients with other primary tumor sites. Am J Surg 2000;179:407–411.

5. Nam RK, Fleshner N, Rakovitch E, et al. Prevalence and patterns of the use of complementary therapies among prostate cancer patients: An epidemiological analysis. J Urol 1999;161:1521–1524.

6. Nayak S, Matheis RJ, Schoenberger NE, Shiflett SC. Use of unconventional therapies by individuals with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. In press.

7. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. JAMA 1998;279:1548–1553.

8. National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference on Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Bethesda, Maryland, April 29–May 1, 1996. Proceedings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:49–183.

9. Glaros AG, Glass EG, Hayden WJ. History of treatment received by patients with TMD: A preliminary investigation. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:147–151.

10. Marbach JJ, Lipton JA. Aspects of illness behavior in patients with facial pain. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96: 630–638.

11. Marbach JJ, Lipton JA. Treatment of patients with temporomandibular joint and other facial pain by otolaryn-gologists. Arch Otolaryngol 1982;108:102–107.

12. White BA, Williams LA, Leben JR. Health care utilization and cost among health maintenance organization members with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:158–169.

13. Glass EG, Glaros AG, McGlynn FD. Myofascial pain dysfunction: Treatments used by ADA members. Cranio 1993;11:25–29.

14. Pierce CJ, Weyant RJ, Block HM, Nemir DC. Dental splint prescription patterns: A survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:248–254.

15. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

16. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: Clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:273–281.

17. Marbach JJ, Ballard GT, Frankel MR, Raphael KG. Patterns of TMJ surgery: Evidence of sex differences. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:609–614.

18. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

19. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ. Widespread pain and the effectiveness of oral splints in myofascial face pain. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:305–316.

20. Palinkas LA, Kabongo ML. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by primary care patients. A SURF*NET study. J Fam Pract 2000;49:1121–1130.

21. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med 1993;328:246–252.

22. Schwartz CE, Laitin E, Brotman S, LaRocca N. Utilization of unconventional treatments by persons with MS: Is it alternative or complementary? Neurology 1999;52:626–629.

23. Dworkin SF. Behavioral and educational modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83: 128–133.

24. Okeson JP, Moody PM, Kemper JT, Haley JV. Evaluation of occlusal splint therapy and relaxation procedures in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:420–424.

25. Rosted P. Practical recommendations for the use of acupuncture in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders based on the outcome of published controlled stud-ies. Oral Dis 2001;7:109–115.

26. Ernst E, White AR. Acupuncture as a treatment for temporomandibular joint dysfunction: A systematic review of randomized trials. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:269–272.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top