Article Data

  • Views 303
  • Dowloads 58

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of Algometry and Palpation in the Recognition of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Complaints

  • C. M. Visscher1,*,
  • Frank Lobbezoo1
  • Machiel Naeije1

1Department of Oral Function, Section of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.18214 Vol.18,Issue 3,September 2004 pp.214-219

Published: 30 September 2004

*Corresponding Author(s): C. M. Visscher E-mail: c.visscher@acta.nl

Abstract

Aims: To determine the construct validity of algometry and to compare it with that of palpation, and to compare tenderness of masticatory muscle sites and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) on palpation and on algometry. Methods: Two hundred fifty sub-jects, 148 with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain com-plaints, underwent a standardized blinded physical examination that included pain-intensity measures on palpation and pressure pain threshold measures on algometry of masseter muscle sites, temporalis muscle sites, and the TMJ. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated that the recognition of TMD pain complaints based on pressure algometry was comparable to that of palpation (R2 = 0.22 and R2 = 0.21, respectively). The masseter muscles were most tender to palpation and algometry, followed by the TMJs and the temporalis muscles. Conclusion: Construct validity of algometry in the recognition of TMD pain complaints is com-parable to that of palpation, and differences in tenderness on pal-pation and on algometry are found between masticatory muscle sites and the TMJ.

Keywords

algometry; construct validity; palpation; temporomandibular pain

Cite and Share

C. M. Visscher,Frank Lobbezoo,Machiel Naeije. Comparison of Algometry and Palpation in the Recognition of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Complaints. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2004. 18(3);214-219.

References

1. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: Reliability, measurement effects, and topographic differences. Pain 1989;37:257–263.

2. Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds). Classification of Chronic Pain. Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. Task Force on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain, ed 2. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994:70.

3. Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assess-ment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:113–184.

4. Ferrari R, Russell AS. Neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17:57–70.

5. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

6. Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, de Boer W, van der Zaag J, Verheij JG, Naeije M. Clinical tests in distinguishing between persons with or without craniomandibular or cervical spinal pain complaints. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108: 475–483.

7. Brox JI. Shoulder pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17:33–56.

8. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. I. An epidemiological investigation of symptoms of dysfunction in Lapps in the north of Finland. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1974;70:37–49.

9. Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Lous I, Olesen J. Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population. Pain 1992;48:197–203.

10. Bendtsen L, Jensen R, Jensen NK, Olesen J. Pressure-controlled palpation: A new technique which increases the reliability of manual palpation. Cephalalgia 1995;15: 205–210.

11. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds, clinical assessment, and differential diagnosis: Reliability and validity in patients with myogenic pain. Pain 1989;39:157–169.

12. Reid KI, Gracely RH, Dubner RA. The influence of time, facial side, and location on pain-pressure thresholds in chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:258–265.

13. Farella M, Michelotti A, Steenks MH, Romeo R, Cimino R, Bosman F. The diagnostic value of pressure algometry in myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:9–14.

14. Wanman A, Agerberg G. Mandibular dysfunction in adolescents. II. Prevalence of signs. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:55–62.

15. Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME. An evaluation of length and endphrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 1985;21:177–185.

16. Task Force on Standards for Measurement in Physical Therapy. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. Phys Ther 1991;71:589–622.

17. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF, Liu C. The reproducibility of muscle and joint tenderness detection methods and maximum mandibular movement measurement for the temporomandibular system. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:17–26.

18. Isselee H, De Laat A, De Mot B, Lysens R. Pressure-pain threshold variation in temporomandibular disorder myalgia over the course of the menstrual cycle. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:105–117.

19. Ohrbach R, Crow H, Kamer A. Examiner expectancy effects in the measurement of pressure pain thresholds. Pain 1998;74:163–170.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top