Individual Variations in Numerically Modeled Human Muscle and Temporomandibular Joint Forces During Static Biting

Aims: To test the effects of occlusal force (OF) angle on the varia-tions in predicted muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) forces during unilateral molar bites. Methods: The cran-iomandibular (CM) geometries of 21 individuals were determined from lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. These geometries were used in a numerical model based on minimization of muscle effort. This model was previously validated for this sub-ject group through the use of jaw tracking and electromyographic data. The model predicted muscle and TMJ forces associated with static OFs on the right mandibular first molar. OF angle was var-ied from vertical to 40 degrees in the buccal and lingual directions, in increments of 10 degrees. Results: Intra- and intersubject varia-tions in predicted muscle and TMJ forces for unilateral molar bit-ing were dependent on OF angle and CM geometry. Nonvertical OFs were associated with either large anterior temporalis muscle forces (＞100% of applied OF in 3 subjects) or large inferior lat-eral pterygoid muscle forces (＞ 90% of applied OF in 3 subjects). On average, vertically and buccally directed OFs were associated with higher mean contralateral TMJ forces (60% of applied OF, SD 12%). Two subjects had large ipsilateral or contralateral TMJ forces (＞ 90% of applied OF). Conclusion: In a group of healthy subjects, depending on the individual CM geometry, large muscle and/or TMJ forces were predicted to be associated with specific unilateral molar OF angles. Propensities to increased muscle or joint forces may be predisposing factors in the development of myofascial pain or intracapsular disease. The results may explain, in part, the variation in location of symptoms in individuals who first present with temporomandibular disorders.

biting; modeling, muscles; occlusal forces; temporomandibular joint

1. Solberg WK. Epidemiology, incidence and prevalence of temporomandibular disorders: A review. In: Laskin DM, Greenfield W, Gale E, et al (eds). The President’s Conference on the Examination, Diagnosis, and Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1982:30–39.

2. Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. Epidemiology of temporo-mandibular disorders. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995:1–14.

3. Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Petersson A. Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:200–206.

4. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. TMJ osteoarthrosis: A differentiation of diagnostic subgroups by symptom history and demographics. J Craniomandib Disord 1987;1:251–256.

5. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. The role of functional occlusal relationships in temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:265–279.

6. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. The role of intercuspal occlusal relationships in temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:96–106.

7. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. Analysis of occlusal variables, dental attrition, and age for distinguishing healthy controls from female patients with intracapsular temporo-mandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:76–82.

8. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporo-mandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:66–75.

9. Buchanan TS, Shreeve DA. An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:565–574.

10. An KN, Kwak BM, Chao EY, Morrey BF. Determination of muscle and joint forces: A new technique to solve the indeterminate problem. J Biomech Eng 1984;106:364–367.

11. Lu TW, O’Connor JJ, Taylor SJ, Walker PS. Validation of a lower limb model with in vivo femoral forces teleme-tered from two subjects. J Biomech 1998;31:63–69.

12. Li G, Kaufman KR, Chao EY, Rubash HE. Prediction of antagonistic muscle forces using inverse dynamic optimization during flexion/extension of the knee. J Biomech Eng 1999;121:316–322.

13. Niemi J, Nieminen H, Takala EP, Viikari-Juntura E. A static shoulder model based on a time-dependent criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. J Biomech 1996;29:451–460.

14. Prilutsky BI, Isaka T, Albrecht AM, Gregor RJ. Is coordi-nation of two-joint leg muscles during load lifting consistent with the strategy of minimum fatigue? J Biomech 1998;31:1025–1034.

15. Hoek van Dijke GA, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Stam HJ. A biomechanical model on muscle forces in the transfer of spinal load to the pelvis and legs. J Biomech 1999;32: 927–933.

16. Korioth TW, Hannam AG. Effect of bilateral asymmetric tooth clenching on load distribution at the mandibular condyles. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:62–73.

17. Korioth TW. Simulated physics of the human mandible. In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:179–186.

18. Throckmorton GS, Groshan GJ, Boyd SB. Muscle activity patterns and control of temporomandibular joint loads. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:685–695.

19. van Ruijven LJ, Weijs WA. A new model for calculating muscle forces from electromyograms. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990;61:479–485.

20. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM, Weijs WA, Naeije M. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 1988;21:563–576.

21. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Biomechanical analysis of jaw-closing movements. J Dent Res 1995;74:1564–1570.

22. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modelling. J Biomech 1997;30:943–950.

23. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional dynamical capabilities of the human masticatory muscles. J Biomech 1999;32:145–152.

24. Kang QS, Updike DP, Salathe EP. Theoretical prediction of muscle forces on the mandible during bite. J Biomech Eng 1990;112:432–436.

25. Smith DM, McLachlan KR, McCall WD Jr. A numerical model of temporomandibular joint loading. J Dent Res 1986;65:1046–1052.

26. Trainor PG, McLachlan KR, McCall WD. Modelling of forces in the human masticatory system with optimization of the angulations of the joint loads. J Biomech 1995; 28:829–843.

27. Itoh K, Hayashi T, Miyakawa M. Controllability of tem-poromandibular joint loading by coordinative activities of masticatory muscles: A two-dimensional static analysis. Front Med Biol Eng 1997;8:123–138.

28. Herzog W, Binding P. Mathematically indeterminate systems. In: Nigg BM, Herzog W (eds). Biomechanics of the Musculo-skeletal System. Toronto: Wiley, 1994:491–505.

29. Raikova R. About weight factors in the non-linear objective functions used for solving indeterminate problems in biomechanics. J Biomech 1999;32:689–694.

30. Nickel JC, McLachlan KR, Smith DM. Eminence development of the postnatal human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 1988;67:896–902.

31. Iwasaki LR, Nickel JC, McLachlan KR. Relationship between growth, function, and stress in the temporo-mandibular joint. In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:125–136.

32. Nickel JC, Yao P, Spalding PM, Iwasaki LR. Validated numerical modeling of the effects of orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment on TMJ loads and muscle forces in humans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121:73–83.

33. Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Walker RD, McLachlan KR, McCall WD Jr. Human masticatory muscle forces during static biting. J Dent Res 2003;82:212–217.

34. Iwasaki LR, Baird BW, McCall WD Jr, Nickel JC. Muscle and TMJ forces associated with chincup loading in humans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124: 530–540.

35. Iwasaki LR, Petsche PE, McCall WD Jr, Marx D, Nickel JC. Neuromuscular objectives for masticatory muscle output during static biting in humans. Arch Oral Biol 2003;48:767–777.

36. Trainor PG, McLachlan KR. A numerical model to predict the force output of the jaw musculature. Eng Optimization 1992;18:317–328.

37. Iwasaki LR. A three-dimensional analysis of isometric biting in long and short facial types [thesis]. Winnipeg: Univ of Manitoba, 1987.

38. Gallo LM, Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Palla S. Stress field translation in the healthy human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 2000;79:1740–1746.

39. Hylander WL. The human mandible: Lever or link? Am J Phys Anthropol 1975;43:227–242.

40. Hannam AG, Langenbach GEJ, Peck CC. Computer simulations of jaw biomechanics. In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997.

41. Van Eijden TM. Jaw muscle activity in relation to the direction and point of application of bite force. J Dent Res 1990;69:901–905.

42. Van Eijden TM, Brugman P, Weijs WA, Oosting J. Coactivation of jaw muscles: Recruitment order and level as a function of bite force direction and magnitude. J Biomechanics 1990;23:475–485.

43. Mao J, Osborn JW. Direction of a bite force determines the pattern of activity in jaw-closing muscles. J Dent Res 1994;73:1112–1120.

44. Trulsson M, Johansson RS. Encoding of amplitude and rate of forces applied to the teeth by human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents. J Neurophysiol 1994;72: 1734–1744.

45. Trulsson M, Johansson RS. Encoding of tooth loads by human periodontal afferents and their role in jaw motor control. Prog Neurobiol 1996;49:267–284.