Use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for Multinational Research: Translation Efforts and Reliability Assessments in The Netherlands

Aims: To outline the steps taken to conduct and to culturally adapt Dutch translations of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) history question-naire, clinical examination form, and verbal instructions to the patients, and to assess the reliability of the clinical examination. Methods: For the linguistic translation from English into Dutch, the forward and back-translation approach was followed. For cul-tural adaptation, an expert panel reviewed the translation, and a pretest was performed on a small clinical sample. Examiner train-ing and calibration were carried out, and the clinical reliability of a “gold standard examiner” and 3 clinicians was assessed on 18 symptomatic TMD patients and 6 asymptomatic controls. The order of the examinations was based on a quasi-random Latin square design. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were cal-culated to assess the overall interexaminer reliability of the clinical examination. Results: A linguistically valid and culturally equiva-lent translation of the RDC/TMD into Dutch resulted from the above-outlined procedure. As for the clinical reliability, the ICC values obtained could mostly be considered “excellent” or, less frequently, as “fair to good.” Poor reliability was found only for some of the palpation tests. For uncommon diagnoses (disc dis-placement without reduction and without limited mouth opening; osteoarthritis), no reliable ICC value could be calculated. Conclusion: The mode described by the authors for preparing clinical sites for RDC/TMD-based research is a feasible one.

clinical examination; questionnaire; reliability; temporomandibular disorders; translation

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

2. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–1432.

3. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

4. Derogatis LR, Cleary PA. Confirmation of the dimen-sional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. J Clin Psychol 1977;33:981–989.

5. Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM. SCL-90: Handleiding bij een Multi-dimensionele Psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets Test Service, 1986.

6. International Consortium for RDC/TMD-Based Research. RDC for TMD Booklet. Available at: www.rdc-tmdinter-national.org/booklet/frmBooklet.htm

7. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–428.

8. John MT, Mancl L, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) reliability assessment using intraclass correlation coefficient. J Dent Res 2001;80:84.

9. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley, 1986.

10. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF. Reproducibility of examiner performance for muscle and joint palpation in the temporomandibular system following training and calibration. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:72–77.

11. John MT, Zwijnenburg AJ. Interobserver variability in assessment of signs of TMD. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:265–270.

12. Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, De Leeuw JRJ, Steenks MH, Bosman F, Buchner R, Olthoff LW. Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part I: Self-report data and clinical findings. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:24–36.

13. Huddleston Slater JJR, Lobbezoo F, van Selms MKA, Naeije M. Recognition of internal derangements. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:851–854.

14. Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. The American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

15. Wabeke KB, Spruijt RJ, van der Zaag J. The reliability of clinical methods for recording temporomandibular joint sounds. J Dent Res 1994;73:1157–1162.

16. De Wijer A, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Steenks MH, Bosman F. Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:181–191.

17. Davies SJ, Gray RJM (eds). A Clinical Guide to Occlusion. London: British Dental Association, 2002.

18. Gallo LM, Svoboda A, Palla S. Reproducibility of temporomandibular joint clicking. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:293–302.

19. Huddleston Slater JJR, Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Mandibular movement characteristics of an anterior disc displacement with reduction. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:135–142.

20. Johnstone DR, Templeton MC. The feasibility of palpating the lateral pterygoid muscle. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:318–323.

21. Türp JC, Minagi S. Palpation of the lateral pterygoid region in TMD—Where is the evidence? J Dent 2001;29:475–483.

22. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;20:240–253.

23. Yap AUJ, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KBC, Tan HH. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychosocial dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21–28.

24. Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, de Boer W, van der Zaag J, Naeije M. The prevalence of cervical spinal pain in craniomandibular pain patients. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:76–80.