Article Data

  • Views 302
  • Dowloads 59

Original Research

Open Access

Daily Pain Coping Among Patients with Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder Pain: An Electronic Diary Study

  • Leslie A. Aaron1
  • Judith A. Turner2,*,
  • Lloyd A. Mancl3
  • Craig N. Sawchuk4
  • Kimberly H. Huggins1
  • Edmond L. Truelove1

1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

2Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral, Sciences and Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

3Department of Dental Public Health Services, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.20125 Vol.20,Issue 2,June 2006 pp.125-137

Published: 30 June 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Judith A. Turner E-mail: jturner@u.washington.edu

Abstract

Aims: To describe patients’ daily coping with the pain of chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMD), the conservative treatment received, and the self-care strategies used, and to examine the rela-tionships between these strategies and daily pain intensity, activity interference, and jaw use limitations. Methods: TMD clinic patients (n = 137, 88% women) completed electronic diary mea-sures of pain, interference, jaw use limitations, and use of 20 strategies 3 times daily for 2 weeks. Results: Reliability and valid-ity were demonstrated for 4 scales of related coping items: cogni-tive coping, relaxation, activity reduction, and emotional support. Average scores were higher on the relaxation and activity reduc-tion scales than on the cognitive coping and emotional support scales. Among the coping items not included in the scales, “did something to try to reduce pain” (direct action) was endorsed most frequently (reported in a median of 74% of interviews). Heat, cold, and seeking spiritual support were used least (≤ 5%). At times of increased pain, patients were more likely to use almost all types of strategies. Pain intensity was associated strongly with concurrent activity interference and jaw use limitations. When the design controlled for pain intensity, activity reduction and seeking emotional support were associated positively within-subjects with interference and jaw use limitations. Conclusion: TMD clinic patients use a variety of treatment, self-care, and coping strategies to contend with daily pain. Inquiring about a broad range of strategies might help clinicians better understand how individual patients approach pain management. Research is needed to exam-ine whether decreasing activity reduction and emotional support coping results in improved outcomes.

Keywords

chronic pain; electronic diaries; pain coping strategies; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Leslie A. Aaron,Judith A. Turner,Lloyd A. Mancl,Craig N. Sawchuk,Kimberly H. Huggins,Edmond L. Truelove. Daily Pain Coping Among Patients with Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder Pain: An Electronic Diary Study. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2006. 20(2);125-137.

References

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomand Disord 1992;6:301–355.

2. Butterworth JC, Deardorff WW. Psychometric profiles of craniomandibular pain patients: Identifying specific subgroups. J Craniomandib Pract 1987;5:225–232.

3. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Zaki HS, Curtin HD. An empirical taxometric alternative to traditional classification of tem-poromandibular disorders. Pain 1989;36:311–320.

4. Suvinen TI, Hanes KR, Gerschman JA, Reade PC. Psychophysical subtypes of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1997;11:200–205.

5. Dworkin SF. Behavioral characteristics of chronic tem-poromandibular disorders: Diagnosis and assessment. In: Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA (eds). Temporomandibular Disorders and Related Conditions. Seattle: IASP Press, 1995:175–192.

6. Brown GK, Nicassio PM. The development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain 1987;31:53–65.

7. Hadjistavropoulos HD, MacLeod FK, Asmundson GJ. Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. Pain 1999;80:471–481.

8. Romano JM, Jensen MP, Turner JA. The chronic pain coping inventory-42: Reliability and validity. Pain 2003;104:65–73.

9. Snow-Turek AL, Norris MP, Tan G. Active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain 1996;64:455–462.

10. Tan G, Nguyen Q, Anderson KO, Jensen MP, Thornby J. Further validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. J Pain 2005;6:29–40.

11. Affleck G, Urrows S, Tennen H, Higgins P. Daily coping with pain from rheumatoid arthritis: Patterns and correlates. Pain 1992;51:221–229.

12. Strahl C, Kleinknecht RA, Dinnel DL. The role of pain anxiety, coping, and pain self-efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis patient functioning. Behav Res Ther 2000;38:863–873.

13. Jaspers JPC, Heuvel F, Stegenga B, de Bont LGM. Strategies for coping with pain and psychological distress associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. Clin J Pain 1993;9:94–103.

14. Turner JA, Whitney C, Dworkin SF, Massoth D, Wilson L. Do changes in patient beliefs and coping strategies predict temporomandibular disorder treatment outcomes?Clin J Pain 1995;11:177–188.

15. Turner JA, Dworkin SF, Mancl L, Huggins KH, Truelove EL. The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain 2001;92:41–51.

16. Dimitroulis G. Temporomandibular disorders: A clinical update. BMJ 1998;317:190–194.

17. List T, Axelsson S, Leijon G. Pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders, atypical facial pain, and burning mouth syndrome. A qualitative systematic review. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:301–310.

18. Wig AD, Aaron LA, Turner JA, Huggins KH, Truelove E. Short-term clinical outcomes and patient compliance with temporomandibular disorder treatment recommendations. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:203–213.

19. Affleck G, Zautra A, Tennen H, Armeli S. Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: A preface for the perplexed. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67:746–754.

20. Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Neale JM, et al. A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74: 1670–1680.

21. Litt MD, Shafer D, Napolitano C. Momentary mood and coping processes in TMD pain. Health Psychol 2004;23:354–362.

22. Turner JA, Mancl L, Aaron LA. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for temporomandibular disorder pain: Effects on daily electronic outcome and process measures. Pain 2005;117:377–387.

23. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

24. Von Korff M. Epidemiological and survey methods: Assessment of chronic pain. In: Turk DC, Melzack R (eds). Handbook of Pain Assessment, ed 2. New York: The Guilford Press, 2001:603–618.

25. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Strom SE. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: Development and preliminary validation. Pain 1995;60:203–216.

26. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983;17:33–44.

27. Swartzman LC, Gwadry FG, Shapiro AP, Teasell RW. The factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Pain 1994;57:311–316.

28. Stone AA, Neale JM. New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;46:892–906.

29. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.

30. Affleck G, Tennen H, Keefe FJ, et al. Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping. Pain 1999;83:601–609.

31. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.

32. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

33. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

34. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

35. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979;6:65–70.

36. Todd M, Tennen H, Carney MA, Armeli S, Affleck G. Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessment. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004;86:310–319.

37. Smith BH, Elliott AM. Active self-management of chronic pain in the community. Pain 2005;113:249–250.

38. Blyth FM, March LM, Nicholas MK, Cousins MJ. Self-management of chronic pain: A population-based study. Pain 2005;113:285–292.

39. Brister H, Turner JA, Aaron LA, Mancl L. Self-Efficacy Is Associated with Pain, Functioning, and Coping in Patients with Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder Pain. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:115–124.

40. Keefe FJ, Affleck G, Lefebvre JC, Starr K, Caldwell DS, Tennen H. Pain coping strategies and coping efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: A daily process analysis. Pain 1997;69:35–42.

41. Tan G, Jensen MP, Robinson-Whelen S, Thornby JI, Monga TN. Coping with chronic pain: A comparison of two measures. Pain 2001;90:127–133.

42. Turner JA, Romano JM. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. In: Loeser JD (ed). Bonica’s Management of Pain, ed 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:1751–1758.

43. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69:655–662.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top