Article Data

  • Views 270
  • Dowloads 29

Original Research

Open Access

Masticatory Muscle Reaction in Simulated Low-Velocity Rear-End Impacts

  • Ivonne A. Hernández1
  • Ken R. Fyfe2
  • Giseon Heo1
  • Paul W. Major1,*,

1Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.20199 Vol.20,Issue 3,September 2006 pp.199-207

Published: 30 September 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Paul W. Major E-mail: major@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the electromyographic (EMG) activity of masseter and temporalis muscles in relation to impact awareness, gender, impact magnitude, and kinematics of head movement in simulated low-velocity rear-end impacts. Methods: Twenty-nine individuals (17 men and 12 women) were subjected in random order to 3 rear-end impacts: 2 unexpected impacts (chair accelera-tions of 4.5 m/s2 and 10.1 m/s2) and 1 expected impact (chair acceleration of 10.1 m/s2). The EMG activity of the deep and superficial masseter muscle was recorded bilaterally. EMG activity was also recorded for the left anterior temporalis muscle. Angular acceleration and angular displacement of the head were also recorded. The temporal relationship between onset of the mastica-tory muscle activity and maximum peak of the kinematics of head movement was determined. Results: The magnitude of normalized masticatory EMG activity ranged from 1.4 to 1.8 times higher (P < .05) for fast unexpected impacts compared to slow unex-pected impacts in all masticatory muscles. The magnitude of normalized anterior temporalis EMG peak response ranged from 1.8 to 2.5 times higher (P < .05) in female subjects than in male subjects for all impacts. No significant differences were identified for impact awareness in the magnitude of normalized EMG activ-ity for any masticatory muscle. No significant differences were identified with respect to timing of masticatory muscle response (P > .05). Conclusion: EMG activity increased with increased impact magnitude. Temporal and amplitude awareness of a simu-lated impact did not produce a difference in the masticatory mus-cle response. Gender differences were identified in the anterior temporalis muscle response. The onset of the masticatory muscle response occurred after peak angular acceleration of the head but prior to peak angular displacement of the head.


Keywords

electromyography; kinematics of head movement; masseter muscle; temporalis muscle; whiplash

Cite and Share

Ivonne A. Hernández,Ken R. Fyfe,Giseon Heo,Paul W. Major. Masticatory Muscle Reaction in Simulated Low-Velocity Rear-End Impacts. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2006. 20(3);199-207.

References

1. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N. Whiplash injury. Pain 1994;58:283–307.

2. Hammacher ER, van der Werken C. Acute neck sprain: “Whiplash’ reappraised. Injury 1996;27:463–466.

3. Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Soft-tissue injuries of the cervical spine. 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:955–957.

4. Magnusson T. Extracervical symptoms after whiplash trauma. Cephalalgia 1994;14:223–227.

5. Pearce JM. Headaches in the whiplash syndrome. Spinal Cord 2001;39:228–233.

6. Balla J, Karnaghan J. Whiplash headache. Clin Exp Neurol 1987;23:179–182.

7. De Benedittis G, De Santis A. Chronic post-traumatic headache: Clinical, psychopathological features and outcome determinants. J Neurosurg Sci 1983;27:177–186.

8. Burgess JA, Kolbinson DA, Lee PT, Epstein JB. Motor vehicle accidents and TMDs: Assessing the relationship. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1767–1772.

9. Braun B, DiGiovanna A, Schiffman E, Bonnema J, Fricton J. A cross-sectional study of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in post-cervical trauma patients. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:24–31.

10. Kronn E. The incidence of TMJ dysfunction in patients who have suffered a cervical whiplash injury following a traffic accident. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:209–213.

11. De Boever JA, Keersmaekers K. Trauma in patients with temporomandibular disorders: Frequency and treatment outcome. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:91–96.

12. Burgess J. Symptom characteristics in TMD patients reporting blunt trauma and/or whiplash injury. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:251–7.

13. Probert TC, Wiesenfeld D, Reade PC. Temporomandibular pain dysfunction disorder resulting from road traffic accidents—An Australian study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23(6 Pt 1):338–341.

14. Kasch H, Hjorth T, Svensson P, Nyhuus L, Jensen TS. Temporomandibular disorders after whiplash injury: A controlled, prospective study. J Orofac Pain 2002;16: 118–128.

15. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. A method to predict muscle control in the kinematically and mechanically indeterminate human masticatory system. J Biomech 2001;34:1179–1188.

16. Schneider K, Zernicke RF, Clark G. Modeling of jaw-head-neck dynamics during whiplash. J Dent Res 1989;68:1360–1365.

17. Kumar S, Narayan Y, Amell T. An electromyographic study of low-velocity rearend impacts. Spine 2002;27:1044–1055.

18. West DH, Gough PE, Harper GTE. Low speed rearend collision testing using human subjects. Accid Reconstruction J 1993;5:22–26.

19. Ono K, Kanno M. Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rearend collisions. Accid Anal Prev 1996;28:493–499.

20. Siegmund GP, Brault JR. Role of cervical muscles during whiplash. In: Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (eds). Frontiers in Whiplash Trauma: Clinical and Biomechanical. Washington, DC: IOS Press, 2000:295–320.

21. Brault JR, Siegmund GP, Wheeler JB. Cervical muscle response during whiplash: Evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000;15:426–435.

22. Siegmund G, Brault J, Chimich D. Do cervical muscles play a role in whiplash injury? J Whiplash Relat Disord 2002;1:23–40.

23. Siegmund GP, Sanderson DJ, Myers BS, Inglis JT. Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. J Biomech 2003;36:473–482.

24. Siegmund GP, Sanderson DJ, Myers BS, Inglis JT. Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine 2003;28:671–679.

25. Winnberg A, Pancherz H. Head posture and masticatory muscle function. An EMG investigation. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:209–217.

26. Van Eijden TM, Blanksma NG, Brugman P. Amplitude and timing of EMG activity in the human masseter muscle during selected motor tasks. J Dent Res 1993;72:599–606.

27. Ormeño G, Miralles R, Loyola R, et al. Body position effects on EMG activity of the temporal and suprahyoid muscles in healthy subjects and in patients with myogenic cranio- cervical-mandibular dysfunction. Cranio 1999;17:132–142.

28. Basmajian J, de Luca C. Description and analysis of the EMG signal. In: Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography, ed 5. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1985:65–100.

29. Friedman MH, Weisberg J. The craniocervical connection: A retrospective analysis of 300 whiplash patients with cervical and temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 2000;18:163–167.

30. Newham DJ. The consequences of eccentric contractions and their relationship to delayed onset muscle pain. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1988;57:353–359.

31. Koelbaek Johansen M, Graven-Nielsen T, Schou Olesen A, Arendt-Nielsen L. Generalised muscular hyperalgesia in chronic whiplash syndrome. Pain 1999;83:229–234.

32. Castro WH, Schilgen M, Meyer S, Weber M, Peuker C, Wortler K. Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts? Eur Spine J 1997;6:366–375.

33. Bogduk N, Yoganandan N. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: Minor injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001;16:267–275.

34. Brault JR, Wheeler JB, Siegmund GP, Brault EJ. Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end automobile collisions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:72–80.

35. Siegmund G. The Reflex Response of Human Neck Muscles to Whiplash-like Perturbations [thesis]. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia, 2001.

36. Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Hasselquist L, et al. Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact. Eur Spine J 1999;8:118–125.

37. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, D’Addona A, Barbini E. Electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles in normal young people. Statistical evaluation of reference values for clinical applications. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:271–280.

38. Stohler CS, Zhang X, Lund JP. The effect of experimental jaw muscle pain on postural muscle activity. Pain 1996;66:215–221.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top