Article Data

  • Views 260
  • Dowloads 25

Original Research

Open Access

The Impact of Oral Pain on Quality of Life During Pregnancy in Low-Income Brazilian Women

  • Branca Heloisa de Oliveira1,*,
  • Paulo Nadanovsky2

1Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.20297 Vol.20,Issue 4,December 2006 pp.297-305

Published: 30 December 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Branca Heloisa de Oliveira E-mail: branca.heloisa@terra.com.br/branca.oliveira@gmail.com

Abstract

Aims: To assess the effects of oral pain on oral health–related quality of life during pregnancy and document measures taken by pregnant women seeking relief for oral pain. Their experience of other types of pain were also investigated. Methods: A sample of pregnant women who were admitted to a public hospital to give birth were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. Those who agreed were asked if they had experienced any pain due to problems with their mouth, teeth, or dentures during the 6 months prior to the interviews. Interviewees who answered affir-matively were questioned about the effects of this pain on their normal activities with the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) tool. Results: The study population consisted of 504 sub-jects (83% of the eligible individuals). A high prevalence of untreated dental caries was found. The prevalences of oral pain, headaches, back pain, and pelvic pain were 39.1%, 61.5%, 59.3%, and 60.9%, respectively. Of those reporting pain, 168 (33.3%) reported having had difficulty doing at least one of the activities included in the OIDP due to oral pain. The most fre-quently mentioned effects were difficulty in maintaining emotional balance (23.6%), difficulty eating (22.8%), and difficulty cleaning teeth (20%). The mean and median OIDP scores were 13.9% and 8.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Oral pain during pregnancy was an important problem for this group of women and had a negative effect on their quality of life.

Keywords

oral health; pain; pregnancy; quality of life; toothache

Cite and Share

Branca Heloisa de Oliveira,Paulo Nadanovsky. The Impact of Oral Pain on Quality of Life During Pregnancy in Low-Income Brazilian Women. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2006. 20(4);297-305.

References

1. Locker D, Grushka M. The impact of dental and facial pain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1414–1417.

2. Miller J, Swallow JN. Dental pain and health. Public Health 1970;85:46–50.

3. Jaafar N, Razak IA, Zain RB. The social impact of oral and facial pain in an industrial population. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1989;18:553–555.

4. Shepherd MA, Nadanovsky P, Sheiham A. The prevalence and impact of dental pain in 8-year-old school children in Harrow, England. Br Dent J 1999;187:38–41.

5. Sternbach RA. Survey of pain in the United States: The Nuprin pain report. Clin J Pain 1986;2:49–53.

6. Reisine ST. The effects of pain and oral health on the quality of life. Community Dent Health 1988;5:63–68.

7. Cohen LK, Jago JD. Toward the formulation of socioden-tal indicators. Int J Health Serv 1976;6:681–698.

8. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. In: Slade GD (ed). Measuring Oral Health and Quality of Life. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of Dental Ecology, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, 1997:151–160.

9. Sheiham A, Steele JG, Marcenes W, Tsakos G, Finch S, Walls AW. Prevalence of impacts of dental and oral disorders and their effects on eating among older people; a national survey in Great Britain. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:195–203.

10. Tsakos G, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Evaluation of a modified version of the index of Oral Impacts On Daily Performances (OIDP) in elderly populations in two European countries. Gerodontology 2001;18:121–130.

11. Goes PSA. The Prevalence and Impact of Dental Pain in Brazilian Schoolchildren and Their Families [thesis]. London: University of London, 2001.

12. Masalu JR, Astrom AN. Applicability of an abbreviated version of the oral impacts on daily performances (OIDP) scale for use among Tanzanian students. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:7–14.

13. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health 2004;21:161–169.

14. Adulyanon S, Vourapukjaru J, Sheiham A. Oral impacts affecting daily performance in a low dental disease Thai population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:385–389.

15. Robinson PG, Pankhurst CL, Garrett EJ. Randomized-controlled trial: Effect of a reservoir biteguard on quality of life in xerostomia. J Oral Pathol Med 2005; 34:193–197.

16. Cortes MI, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Impact of traumatic injuries to the permanent teeth on the oral health-related quality of life in 12-14-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:193–198.

17. Melas F, Marcenes W, Wright PS. Oral health impact on daily performance in patients with implant-stabilized over-dentures and patients with conventional complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:700–712.

18. de Albuquerque OM, Abegg C, Rodrigues CS. Pregnant women’s perceptions of the Family Health Program concerning barriers to dental care in Pernambuco, Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica 2004;20:789–796.

19. Menino RTM, Bijella VT. Necessidades de saúde bucal em gestantes dos núcleos de saúde de Bauru. Conhecimentos com relação à própria saúde bucal. Rev Fac Odont Bauru 1995;3:5–16.

20. Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

21. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. São Paulo: Associão Brasileira Empresas de Pesquisa, 2003.

22. World Health Organization (WHO). Oral Health Surveys—Basic Methods. Geneva: WHO, 1997.

23. Bjorklund K, Bergstrom S. Is pelvic pain in pregnancy a welfare complaint? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79: 24–30.

24. MacEvilly M, Buggy D. Back pain and pregnancy: A review. Pain 1996;64:405–414.

25. Gilbert GH, Duncan RP, Heft MW, Dolan TA, Vogel WB. Oral disadvantage among dentate adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:301–313.

26. Bernd B, Souza CB, Lopes CB, et al. Percepção popular sobre saúde bucal: O caso das gestantes do Valão. Saúde em Debate 1992;34:33–39.

27. Rogers SN. Dental attendance in a sample of pregnant women in Birmingham, UK. Community Dent Health 1991;8:361–368.

28. Gaffield ML, Gilbert BJ, Malvitz DM, Romaguera R. Oral health during pregnancy: An analysis of information collected by the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1009–1016.

29. Livingston HM, Dellinger TM, Holder R. Considerations in the management of the pregnant patient. Spec Care Dentist 1998;18:183–188.

30. Mengue SS, Schenkel EP, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI. Drug use by pregnant women in six Brazilian cities [in Portuguese]. Rev Saude Publica 2001;35:415–420.

31. LeResche L, Sherman JJ, Huggins K, et al. Musculo-skeletal orofacial pain and other signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders during pregnancy: A prospective study. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:193–201.

32. Silva AA, Ribeiro VS, Borba AF Jr, Coimbra LC, Silva RA. Evaluation of data quality from the information system on live births in 1997–1998 [in Portuguese]. Rev Saude Publica 2001;35:508–514.

33. Theme Filha MM, da Gama SGN, da Cunha CB, Leal MC. Reliability of birth certificate data in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999–2001 [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica 2004;20(suppl 1):S83–S91.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top