Article Data

  • Views 257
  • Dowloads 51

Original Research

Open Access

Self-reported Oral Parafunctions and Pain Intensity in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients

  • Marylee J. van der Meulen1,*,
  • Frank Lobbezoo1
  • Irene H. A. Aartman2
  • Machiel Naeije1

1Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2Department of Social Dentistry and Dental Health Education, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.2031 Vol.20,Issue 1,March 2006 pp.31-35

Published: 30 March 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Marylee J. van der Meulen E-mail: m.vd.meulen@acta.nl

Abstract

Aim: To examine the relationship between different types of self-reported oral parafunctions and pain intensity in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Two cohorts of TMD pain patients, 1 comprising 303 patients and the other com-prising 226 patients, completed a 12-item oral parafunctions ques-tionnaire as well as the Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis II ques-tionnaire, which includes a characteristic pain intensity score (CPI). Relationships between oral parafunctions and CPI were examined; age and gender were controlled for. The effects of phrasing of the oral parafunction questions were also examined. For 1 cohort, the questions were directed at the mere occurrence of the parafunctions; in the other, the questions addressed the per-ceived stressfulness of parafunctional behavior to the jaw. Results: A principal component analysis of the responses to the question-naires led to 3 factors (scales) in both cohorts: (1) a BRUX scale for bruxism activities; (2) a BITE scale for biting activities (eg, chewing gum, nails); and (3) a SOFT scale for soft tissue activities (eg, tongue, lips). Statistical significance was reached for 2 of the 6 relationships studied (P < .05), but with a very low explained vari-ance (approximately 3.5%). Conclusion: No clinically relevant relationships were found between different types of self-reported oral parafunctions and TMD pain complaints.

Keywords

bruxism; oral parafunctions; pain; self-report; tem-poromandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Marylee J. van der Meulen,Frank Lobbezoo,Irene H. A. Aartman,Machiel Naeije. Self-reported Oral Parafunctions and Pain Intensity in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2006. 20(1);31-35.

References

1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, technique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

2. American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:230.

3. Glaros AG. Incidence of diurnal and nocturnal bruxism. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:545–550.

4. Faulkner KDB. Bruxism: A review of the literature. Part I. Aust Dent J 1990;35:266–276.

5. Lavigne GJ, Montplaisir JV. Restless leg syndrome and sleep bruxism. Prevalence and association among Canadians. Sleep 1994;17:739–743.

6. Hathaway KM. Bruxism. Definition, measurement, and treatment. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995:375–386.

7. Lavigne GJ, Montplaisir JV. Bruxism. Epidemiology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995:387–404.

8. Manfredini D, Cantini E, Romagnoli M, Bosco M. Prevalence of bruxism with different Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) diagnoses. Cranio 2003;21:279–285.

9. Molina OF, Santos J dos, Nelson SJ, Nowlin T. A clinical study of specific signs and symptoms of CMD in bruxers classified by the degree of severity. Cranio 1999;17: 268–280.

10. Lobbezoo F, Lavigne GJ. Do bruxism and temporo-mandibular disorders have a cause-and-effect relationship?J Orofac Pain 1997;11:15–23.

11. Molina OF, dos Santos J, Mazetto M, Nelson SJ, Nowlin T, Mainieri EZ. Oral jaw behaviors in TMD and bruxism: A comparison study by severity of bruxism. Cranio 2001;19:114–122.

12. Lobbezoo F, van Selms MKA, John MT, et al. Use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for multinational research: Translation efforts and reliability assessment in the Netherlands. J Orofac Pain 2005;4:301–308.

13. Stevens J. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, ed 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1986.

14. Glaros AG, Burton E. Parafunctional clenching, pain, and effort in temporomandibular disorders. J Behav Med 2004;27:91–101.

15. Molina OF, dos Santos J, Nelson SJ, Nowlin T. Profile of TMD and bruxer compared to TMD and nonbruxer patients regarding chief complaints, previous consultations, modes of therapy, and chronicity. Cranio 2000;18:205–220.

16. Lavigne GJ, Rompré PH, Montplaisir JY, Lobbezoo F. Motor activity in sleep bruxism with concomitant jaw muscle pain: A retrospective pilot study. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:92–95.

17. Arima T, Svensson P, Rasmussen C, Nielsen KD, Drewes AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. The relationship between selective sleep deprivation, nocturnal jaw-muscle activity and pain in healthy men. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:140–148.

18. van der Zaag J, Lobbezoo F, Wicks DJ, Hamburger HL, Naeije M. Is self-reported jaw pain on mouth opening associated with a reduced bruxism time index? J Oral Rehabil (in press).

19. Lund JP, Donga R, Widmer CG, Stohler CS. The pain adaptation model: A discussion of the relationship between chronic musculoskeletal pain and motor activity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1991;69:683–694.

20. Velly AM, Gornitsky M, Philippe P. Contributing factors to chronic myofascial pain: A case-control study. Pain 2003;104:491–499.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top