A Reliability Study of Dynamic and Static Pain Tests in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients

Aim: To determine the interexaminer reliability of dynamic and static pain tests in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: One hundred fifteen consecutive TMD patients participated in the study. At intake, pain on dynamic and static pain tests was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale by 1 of 5 dentists. Pressure was applied to the mandible during mandibular opening, closing, and protrusive movements (dynamic tests) and while the mandible was kept motionless by the patient in an open, closed, or protrusive position (static tests). After this examination, the dynamic and static pain tests were performed a second time by 1 of 2 physical therapists blinded to the outcome of the first examination. Prior to the study, all examiners took part in a yearly training session, while 3 examiners (2 dentists and 1 physical therapist) were trained on a more regular basis. Results: The interexaminer reliability of dynamic and static pain tests ranged from “poor” to “fair to good” (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.29–0.54) but reached the “excellent” level (ICC: 0.34–0.92) when only the data gathered by the more extensively trained examiners were considered. The reliability was higher when the data were analyzed on the 4-point scale as compared to a dichotomized pain scale. Conclusion: The reliability of dynamic and static pain tests for the temporomandibular region is fair to good when rated on an ordinal pain scale. Thorough training of examiners can improve the reliability considerably.

dynamic and static pain tests; interexaminer reliability; temporomandibular disorders

1. Andersson HI. The epidemiology of chronic pain in a Swedish rural area. Qual Life Res 1994;3:S19–S26.

2. Picavet HS, Schouten JS. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: Prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 2003;102:167–178.

3. De Kanter RJ, Kayser AF, Battistuzzi PG, Truin GJ, Van ’t Hof MA. Demand and need for treatment of craniomandibular dysfunction in the Dutch adult population. J Dent Res 1992;71:1607–1612.

4. Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach-Robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:115–121.

5. McNeill C, Mohl ND, Rugh JD, Tanaka TT. Temporomandibular disorders: Diagnosis, management, education, and research.J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120:253–263.

6. Okeson JP. Differential diagnosis and management considerations of temporomandibular disorders. In: Okeson JP (ed). Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:113–184.

7. Grant RN, McKenzie RA. Mechanical diagnosis and therapy for the cervical and thoracic spine. In: Grant R (ed). Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:359–377.

8. Al-Hasson HK, Ismail AI, Ash MM Jr. Concerns of patients seeking treatment for TMJ dysfunction. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:217–221.

9. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987;12:S1–S59.

10. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

11. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–172.

12. Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds). Classification of Chronic Pain. Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. Task Force on Taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994:1–119.

13. Schochat T, Raspe H. Elements of fibromyalgia in an open population. Rheumatology 2003;42:829–835.

14. Croft P, Schollum J, Silman A. Population study of tender point counts and pain as evidence of fibromyalgia. Br Med J 1994;309:696–699.

15. Croft P. Testing for tenderness: What’s the point? J Rheumatol 2000;27:2531–2533.

16. Türp JC, Minagi S. Palpation of the lateral pterygoid region in TMD—Where is the evidence? J Dent 2001;29:475–483.

17. Cyriax JH, Cyriax PJ. Principles of diagnosis. In: Cyriax JH,Cyriax PJ (eds). Cyriax’s Illustrated Manual of Orthopaedic Medicine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998:3–18.

18. Naeije M, Hansson TL. Electromyographic screening of myogenous and arthrogenous TMJ dysfunction patients. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:433–441.

19. Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, de Boer W, van der Zaag J, Verheij JG, Naeije M. Clinical tests in distinguishing between persons with or without craniomandibular or cervical spinal pain complaints. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108: 475–483.

20. Lobbezoo F, van Selms MK, John MT, et al. Use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for multinational research: Translation efforts and reliability assessments in the Netherlands. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:301–308.

21. Schmitter M, Ohlmann B, John MT, Hirsch C, Rammelsberg P. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: A calibration and reliability study. J Craniomand Pract 2005;23:212–218.

22. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: Reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42–51.

23. John MT, Dworkin SF, Mancl LA. Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Pain 2005;118:61–69.

24. Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed). The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986:1–32.

25. de Wijer A, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Steenks MH, Bosman

F. Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:181–191.

26. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:574–579.

27. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T. Reliability of clinical measurement in temporomandibular disorders. Clin J Pain 1988;4:89–99.

28. Leher A, Graf K, PhoDuc JM, Rammelsberg P. Is there a difference in the reliable measurement of temporomandibular disorder signs between experienced and inexperienced examiners? J Orofac Pain 2005;19:58–64.

29. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–549.