Article Data

  • Views 290
  • Dowloads 30

Original Research

Open Access

Intra- and Interrater Agreement of Pressure Pain Threshold for Masticatory Structures in Children Reporting Orofacial Pain Related to Temporomandibular Disorders and Symptom-free Children

  • Thaís Cristina Chaves1
  • Harumi Martins Nagamine2
  • Letícia Melo de Sousa2
  • Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira3
  • Débora Bevilaqua Grossi3,*,

1Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation Program, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, USP

2Physical Therapy Course, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, USP

3Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, USP

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.21.2.07 Vol.21,Issue 2,June 2007 pp.133-142

Published: 30 June 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Débora Bevilaqua Grossi E-mail: deborabg@fmrp.usp.br

Abstract

Aims: To determine intra- and interrater agreement of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) values for children reporting orofacial pain related to temporomadibular disorders and symptom-free subjects when the mean of 3 consecutive measurements or the mean of the last 2 consecutive measurements was considered. Methods: Fourteen children reporting pain in masticatory muscles or the temporomandibular joint and 16 symptom-free children were selected at random from a sample of 100 children. Two trained raters used an algometer to obtain 3 consecutive measurements of PPT of the masticatory system sites. The children were evaluated in 3 sessions after a minimum period of 3 days after the initial evaluation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the levels of agreement. Results: Excellent intra- and interrater agreement was observed (ICC > 0.75) for most of the structures evaluated in symptom-free children, and excellent and moderate agreement was obtained for the symptomatic group. Discarding the first of the 3 measurements increased the number of sites with ICC values classified as excellent in both groups. For evaluations performed on different days, this procedure reduced significantly the percentage of sites with ICC values classified as excellent only for the interrater agreement for the symptomatic group. Conclusion: The lower levels of reproducibility for the measurements obtained on different days in the children who reported pain may have been related to instability of their clinical signs and symptoms, and a PPT assessment based on the mean of 3 consecutive measurements or the procedure of discarding the first measure should be considered for such evaluations, especially when they are conducted by different raters. Algometry was shown to be a reliable tool for the evaluation of pain threshold in the masticatory structures of children.

Keywords

agreement; children; orofacial pain; pain report; pressure pain threshold; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Thaís Cristina Chaves,Harumi Martins Nagamine,Letícia Melo de Sousa,Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira,Débora Bevilaqua Grossi. Intra- and Interrater Agreement of Pressure Pain Threshold for Masticatory Structures in Children Reporting Orofacial Pain Related to Temporomandibular Disorders and Symptom-free Children. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2007. 21(2);133-142.

References

1. Reid KI, Gracely RH, Dubner RA. The influence of time, facial side, and location on pain-pressure thresholds in chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:258–265.

2. Dworkin SF, LeResche L (eds). Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

3. Kosek E, Ekholm J, Nordemar R. A comparison of pressure pain thresholds in different tissues and body regions. Scand J Rehab Med 1993;25:117–124.

4. Fredriksson L, Alstergren P, Kopp S. Absolute and relative facial pressure-pain thresholds in healthy individuals. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:98–104.

5. Farella M, Michelotti A, Steenks MH, Romeo R, Cimino R, Bosman F. The diagnostic value of pressure algometry in myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. J Oral Rehab 2000; 27:9-14.

6. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds, clinical assessment, and differential diagnosis: Reliability and validity in patients with myogenic pain. Pain 1989;39:157–169.

7. Chung SC, Um BY, Kim HS. Evaluation of pressure pain threshold in head and neck muscles by electronic algometer: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Cranio 1992;10:28–34.

8. Murphy GJ, Mckinney MW, Gross WG. Temporomandibular-related pressure thresholds: A model for establishing baselines. Cranio 1992;10:118–123.

9. Goulet JP, Clark GT. Clinical TMJ examination methods. J Calif Dent Assoc 1990;18:25–33.

10. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T. Reliability of clinical measurements in temporomandibular disorders. Clin J Pain 1988;4:89–99.

11. Fischer AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987;30:115–126.

12. Duarte MA, Goulart EMA, Penna FJ. Limiar de dor e idade na infância e adolescência. J Pediatr (Rio J) 1999;75:244–248.

13. Rollman GB, Lautenbacher S. Sex differences in musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2001;17:20–24.

14. Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright

CC. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain 2003;101:259–266.

15. Isselèe H, De Laat A, Lesaffre E, Lysens R. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom-free subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:583–587.

16. Brown FF, Robinson ME, Riley JL, Gremillion HA, McSolay J, Meyers G. Better palpation of pain: Reliability and validity of a new pressure pain protocol in TMD. Cranio 2000;18:58–65.

17. Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: Inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:3–8.

18. List T, Helkimo M, Falk G. Reliability and validity of a pressure threshold meter in recording tenderness in the masseter muscle and the anterior temporalis muscle. Cranio 1989;7:223–229.

19. Silva RS, Conti PCR, Lauris JRP, Silva ROF, Pegoraro LF. Pressure pain threshold in the detection of masticatory myofascial pain: An algometer-based study. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:318–324.

20. Nussbaum EL, Downes L. Reliability of clinical pressurepain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days. Phys Ther 1998;78:160–169.

21. Hogeweg JA, Kuis W, Oostendorp RAB, Helders PJM. The influence of site of stimulation, age, and gender on pain threshold in healthy children. Phys Ther 1996;76:1331–1339.

22. Metsahonkala L, Anttila P, Laimi K, et al. Extracephalic tenderness and pressure pain threshold in children with headache. Eur J Pain 2006;10:581–585.

23. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: Reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42–51.

24. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

25. Franck LS, Greenberg CS, Stevens B. Pain assessment in infants and children. Pediatric Clin North Am 2000;47:487–512.

26. Alamoudi N, Farsi N, Salako NO, Feteih R. Temporomandibular disorders among school children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:323–329.

27. Castelo PM, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR. Relationship between oral parafunctional/nutritive sucking habits and temporomandibular joint disorders in primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;15:29–36.

28. Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Temporomandibular disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head posture and biteforce in children selected for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:179–192.

29. Thilander B, Rubio G, Pena L, Mayorga C. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and its association with malocclusion in children and adolescents: An epidemiologic study related to specified stages of dental development. Angle Orthod 2002;72:146–154.

30. Bonjardim LR, Gavião MBD, Carmagnani FG, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in children with primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;28:53–58.

31. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:574–579.

32. LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Saunders K, Von Korff M. Relationship of pain and symptoms to pubertal development in adolescents. Pain 2005;118:201–209.

33. Mohl ND. Standards for testing new diagnostic strategies for temporomandibular disorders. In: Fricton JR, Dubner

R. Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995.

34. Fonseca DM, Bonfate G, Valle AL, Freitas SFT. Diagnóstico pela anamnese da disfunção craniomandibular. Rev Gaucha Odontol 1994;42:23–28.

35. Poletto PR, Gil Coury HJC, Walsh IAP, Mattielo-Rosa SM. Correlação entre métodos de auto-relato e testes provocativos de avaliação de dor em indivíduos portadores de distúrbios osteomusculares relacionados ao trabalho. Rev Bras Fisioter 2004;8:223–229.

36. Jensen K, Andersen HO, Olesen J, Lindblom U. Pressurepain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain 1986;25:313–323.

37. Fredriksson L, Alstergren P, Kopp S. Pressure pain thresholds in the craniofacial region of female patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:326–332.

38. Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Comparison of algometry and palpation in the recognition of temporomandibular disorder pain complaints. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:214–219.

39. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: Comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988;14:9–17.

40. Schall R. Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 1991;78:719–727.

41. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, Sixth Edition, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 1972.

42. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, ed 3. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top