Temporal Summation of Pain Characterizes Women but not Men with Temporomandibular Disorders

Aims: To examine differences in temporal summation of mechanically evoked pain between women and men suffering from chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), as well as between male TMD patients and healthy controls. Methods: Series of 10 repetitive, mildly noxious mechanical stimuli were applied to the fingers of 27 female TMD patients, 16 male TMD patients, and 20 healthy men. The subjects rated the pain intensity caused by the 1st, 5th, and 10th stimulus in the series. Pain ratings were analyzed by 3-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Pain ratings increased significantly with stimulus repetition for the female TMD patients (P < .001). Women with TMD exhibited significantly greater temporal summation of pain than TMD men (P < .001). Neither the healthy men nor the male TMD patients exhibited significant increases in pain perception with repetitive stimulation. In the female TMD patient group, perceptual pain magnitudes were higher with an interstimulus interval of 2 seconds rather than 10 seconds (P < .005). Conclusion: These findings suggest that central nociceptive processing upregulation is likely to contribute to TMD pain for women but is not a factor for men with TMD.

chronic pain; gender differences; temporal summation; temporomandibular disorders

1. Drangsholt MT, LeResche L. In: Crombie IK (ed). Epidemiology of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 1999:203–233.

2. Warren MP, Fried JL. Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs 2001;169: 187–192.

3. Dworkin SF. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1995:15–32.

4. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

5. Dworkin SF. Perspectives on the interaction of biological, psychological and social factors in TMD. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:856–863.

6. Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF. Five-year outcomes in TMD: Relationship of changes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables. Pain 1998;74:315–326.

7. Sarlani E, Greenspan JD. Evidence for generalized hyperalgesia in temporomandibular disorders patients. Pain 2003;102:221–226.

8. Maixner W, Fillingim R, Sigurdsson A, Kincaid S, Silva S. Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain: Evidence for altered temporal summation of pain. Pain 1998;76:71–81.

9. Sarlani E, Grace EG, Reynolds MA, Greenspan JD. Evidence for up-regulated central nociceptive processing in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:41–55.

10. Ren K. Wind-up and the NMDA receptor: From animal studies to humans. Pain 1994;59:157, 158.

11. Mendell LM, Wall PD. Responses of single dorsal horn cells to peripheral cutaneous unmyelinated fibers. Nature (Lond.) 1965;206:97–99.

12. Mendell LM. Physiology properties of unmyelinated fiber projection to the spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1966;16: 316–332.

13. Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S, Fischer M, Bak P, Bjerring P, Zbinden AM. The effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist (ketamine) on single and repeated nociceptive stimuli: A placebo-controlled experimental human study. Anesth Analg 1995;81:63–68.

14. Davies SN, Lodge D. Evidence for involvement of N-methylaspartate receptors in ‘wind-up’ of class 2 neurones in the dorsal horn of the rat. Brain Res 1987;424: 402–406.

15. Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF. Evidence for a role of the NMDA receptor in the frequency dependent potentiation of deep rat dorsal horn nociceptive neurones following C fibre stimulation. Neuropharmacology 1987;26:1235–1238.

16. Price DD, Hu JW, Dubner R, Gracely RH. Peripheral suppression of first pain and central summation of second pain evoked by noxious heat pulses. Pain 1977;3:57–68.

17. Price DD, Mao J, Frenk H, Mayer DJ. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan selectively reduces temporal summation of second pain in man. Pain 1994;59:165–174.

18. Vierck CJ, Jr., Cannon RL, Fry G, Maixner W, Whitsel BL. Characteristics of temporal summation of second pain sensations elicited by brief contact of glabrous skin by a preheated thermode. J Neurophysiol 1997;78:992–1002.

19. Riley JL, III, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Price DD. A meta-analytic review of pain perception across the menstrual cycle. Pain 1999;81:225–235.

20. Sherman JJ, LeResche L. Does experimental pain response vary across the menstrual cycle? A methodological review. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006;291: R245–R256.

21. Greenspan JD, McGillis SLB. Stimulus features relevant to the perception of sharpness and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain. Somatosensory Motor Res 1991;8:137–147.

22. Gescheider GA. In: Gescheider GA (ed). Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:45–72.

23. Slugg RM, Meyer RA, Campbell JN. Response of cutaneous A- and C-fiber nociceptors in the monkey to controlled-force stimuli. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2179–2191.

24. Greenspan JD, Roy EA, Caldwell PA, Farooq NS. Thermosensory intensity and affect throughout the perceptible range. Somatosens Mot Res 2003;20:19–26.

25. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds, clinical assessment, and differential diagnosis: Reliability and validity in patients with myogenic pain. Pain 1989;39: 157–169.

26. Farella M, Michelotti A, Steenks M, Romeo R, Cimino R, Bosman F. The diagnostic value of pressure algometry in myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:9–14.

27. Svensson P, List T, Hector G. Analysis of stimulus-evoked pain in patients with myofascial temporomandibular pain disorders. Pain 2001;92:399–409.

28. Maixner W, Fillingim R, Kincaid S, Sigurdsson A, Harris MB. Relationship between pain sensitivity and resting arterial blood pressure in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders. Psychosom Med 1997;59:503–511.

29. Kashima K, Rahman OI, Sakoda S, Shiba R. Increased pain sensitivity of the upper extremities of TMD patients with myalgia to experimentally-evoked noxious stimulation: Possibility of worsened endogenous opioid systems. Cranio 1999;17:241–246.

30. Sarlani E, Grace EG, Reynolds MA, Greenspan JD. Sex differences in temporal summation of pain and aftersensations following repetitive noxious mechanical stimulation. Pain 2004;109:115–123.

31. Sarlani E, Greenspan JD. Why look in the brain for answers to temporomandibular disorder pain? Cells Tissues Organs 2005;180:69–75.

32. Yap A, Tan K, Chua E, Tan H. Depression and somatization in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:479–484.

33. Turp JC, Kowalski CJ, Stohler CS. Temporomandibular disorders—Pain outside the head and face is rarely acknowledged in the chief complaint. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:592–595.

34. Turp JC, Kowalski CJ, O’Leary N, Stohler CS. Pain maps from facial pain patients indicate a broad pain geography. J Dent Res 1998;77:1465–1472.