Article Data

  • Views 257
  • Dowloads 41

Original Research

Open Access

Meta-analysis of Treatment Need for Temporomandibular Disorders in Adult Nonpatients

  • M. Ameer Al-Jundi1,*,
  • Mike T. John2
  • Juergen M. Setz1
  • András Szentpétery1
  • Oliver Kuss3

1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

2Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

3Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

4Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

5Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.22.2.02 Vol.22,Issue 2,June 2008 pp.97-107

Published: 30 June 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Ameer Al-Jundi E-mail: al-jundi@web.de

Abstract

Aims: To determine the prevalence of treatment need for temporomandibular disorders in adult populations by meta-analysis of nonpatient studies and to investigate factors influencing temporomandibular disorder treatment-need estimates. Methods: Population-based and nonpatient studies of adult subjects with temporomandibular disorders published in the English language prior to July 2006 were systematically reviewed. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index Expanded) were searched (n = 641). To combine data, fixed- and random-effects meta-regression models were used. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess factors influencing treatment need estimates. Results: Of 676 articles identified, 17 (9,454 subjects) met the study criteria. The prevalence of treatment need for TMD in adults (95% confidence interval) was estimated to be 15.6%(10.0, 23.6) for the fixed effect model and 16.2% (11.2, 21.1) for the random-effects model. Criteria of estimating treatment need and place of study strongly influenced summary estimates of treatment need (P < .001). Need estimates derived from clinical TMD signs were higher than estimates based on subject-reported symptoms (P = .010). Estimates for younger subjects (19 to 45 years) were higher than for older subjects (46+ years; P = .013). Conclusion: The treatment need for TMD in the general adult population is substantial and varies according to definition, criteria, and age. Findings of this meta-analysis can be used for planning and allocating health-care resources.

Keywords

epidemiology; temporomandibular disorders; temporomandibular joint dysfunction; treatment need

Cite and Share

M. Ameer Al-Jundi,Mike T. John,Juergen M. Setz,András Szentpétery,Oliver Kuss. Meta-analysis of Treatment Need for Temporomandibular Disorders in Adult Nonpatients. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2008. 22(2);97-107.

References

1. Daly B, Watt RG, Batchelor P, Treasure EL. Essential Dental Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002:15–17.

2. Sheiham A, Maizels JE, Cushing AM. The concept of need in dental care. Int Dent J 1982;32:265–270.

3. Okeson JP (ed). American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Orofacial Pain : Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

4. Kuttila M, Kuttila S, Le Bell Y, Alanen P. Association between TMD treatment need, sick leaves, and use of health care services for adults. J Orofac Pain 1997;11: 242–248.

5. Carlsson GE, Magnusson T. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders in the General Dental Practice. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999.

6. Pow EH, Leung KC, McMillan AS. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in Hong Kong Chinese. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:228–234.

7. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Alte D, et al. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in an urban and rural German population: Results of a population-based Study of Health in Pomerania. Quintessence Int 2004;35:143–150.

8. Carlsson GE. Epidemiological studies of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint-pain-dysfunction. A literature review. Aust Prosthodont Soc Bull 1984;14:7–12.

9. De Kanter RJ, Truin GJ, Burgersdijk RC, et al. Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res 1993;72:1509–1518.

10. Carlsson GE. Epidemiology and treatment need for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:232–237.

11. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

12. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988; 32:173–183.

13. Salonen L, Hellden L, Carlsson GE. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of dysfunction in the masticatory system: An epidemiologic study in an adult Swedish population. J Craniomandib Disord 1990;4:241–250.

14. Macfarlane TV, Glenny AM, Worthington HV. Systematic review of population-based epidemiological studies of oro-facial pain. J Dent 2001;29:451–467.

15. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283: 2008–2012.

16. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:377–384.

17. Crombie IK. The pocket guide to critical appraisal: A handbook for health care professionals. London: BMJ Publishing, 1996.

18. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Manchester, UK: Wiley & Sons, 2000.

19. Whitehead A. Meta-analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Manchester, UK: Wiley & Sons, 2002.

20. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 2002:553 ff.

21. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337: 867–872.

22. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing up. The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984:63–72.

23. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286–1291.

24. Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark I. Changes in clinical signs of craniomandibular disorders from the age of 15 to 25 years. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:207–215.

25. Shiau YY, Chang C. An epidemiological study of temporomandibular disorders in university students of Taiwan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20: 43–47.

26. Posselt U. The temporomandibular joint syndrome and occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:432–438.

27. Schiffman EL, Fricton JR, Haley DP, Shapiro BL. The prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:295–303.

28. Wanman A, Wigren L. Need and demand for dental treatment. A comparison between an evaluation based on an epidemiologic study of 35-, 50-, and 65-year-olds and performed dental treatment of matched age groups. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:318–324.

29. Hansson T, Nilner M. A study of the occurrence of symptoms of disease of the temporomandibular joint masticatory musculature and related structures. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:313–324.

30. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1974;67:101–121.

31. Tervonen T, Knuuttila M. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction among adults aged 25, 35, 50 and 65 years in Ostrobothnia, Finland. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:455–463.

32. Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. Treatment received, treatment demand, and treatment need for temporomandibular disorders in 35-year-old subjects. Cranio 2002;20:11–17.

33. Kuttila M, Niemi PM, Kuttila S, Alanen P, Le Bell Y. TMD treatment need in relation to age, gender, stress, and diagnostic subgroup. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:67–74.

34. Conti PC, Ferreira PM, Pegoraro LF, Conti JV, Salvador

MC. A cross-sectional study of prevalence and etiology of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in high school and university students. J Orofac Pain 1996; 10:254–262.

35. Bibb CA, Atchison KA, Pullinger AG, Bittar GT. Jaw function status in an elderly community sample. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23:303–308.

36. Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark-Eriksson I. An evaluation of the need and demand for treatment of craniomandibular disorders in a young Swedish population. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:57–63.

37. Agerberg G, Inkapool I. Craniomandibular disorders in an urban Swedish population. J Craniomandib Disord 1990; 4:154–164.

38. Locker D, Slade G. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in a Canadian population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988;16:310–313.

39. Wanman A, Agerberg G. Two-year longitudinal study of symptoms of mandibular dysfunction in adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:321–331.

40. Solberg WK, Woo MW, Houston JB. Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:25–34.

41. Kuttila M. Treatment Need for Temporomandibular Disorders in Adults. A Longitudinal Study [thesis]. Turku, Finland: TurkuUniversity, 1998.

42. Rugh JD, Solberg WK. Oral health status in the United States: Temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Educ 1985; 49:398–406.

43. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. I. An epidemiological investigation of symptoms of dysfunction in Lapps in the north of Finland. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1974;70:37–49.

44. Swanljung O, Rantanen T. Functional disorders of the masticatory system in southwest Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7:177-–182.

45. Heft MW. Prevalence of TMJ signs and symptoms in the elderly. Gerodontology 1984;3:125–130.

46. Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark I. Changes in subjective symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in children and adolescents during a 10-year period. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:76–82.

47. de Leeuw JR, Steenks MH, Ros WJ, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Bosman F, Winnubst JA. Multidimensional evaluation of craniomandibular dysfunction. I: Symptoms and correlates. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:501–514.

48. Goulet JP, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP. Jaw pain prevalence among French-speaking Canadians in Quebec and related symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1995;74:1738–1744.

49. Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. A longitudinal epidemiologic study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders from 15 to 35 years of age. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:310–319.

50. Johansson A, Unell L, Carlsson GE, Soderfeldt B, Halling

A. Gender difference in symptoms related to temporomandibular disorders in a population of 50-year-old subjects. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:29–35.

51. Locker D, Miller Y. Subjectively reported oral health status in an adult population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:425–430.

52. Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 1998;316:140–144.

53. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408–412.

54. Attanasio R. The study of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain from the perspective of the predoctoral dental curriculum. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:176–180.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top