Patterns of Dental Care Utilization Among Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders

Aims: To use data from a large health maintenance organization to specifically investigate dental utilization rates among patients with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Subjects were enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northwest between 1998 and 2003. Two age- and gender-matched controls were selected for each subject who had a TMD diagnosis during the study period. Dental treatment was categorized using Current Dental Terminology (CDT) codes. Overall dental utilization rates were calculated, as well as rates based on age, gender, categories of treatment, and periods before and after TMD diagnoses. These rates were analyzed with t tests. Results: TMD subjects utilized significantly more dental services than comparison subjects overall and for several dental categories. The difference was between 10%to 20%, or about 1 additional dental procedure per year. A positive linear relationship existed between dental utilization rates and age, with a significant increase in utilization for each ascending age cohort. Females had higher dental utilization rates than males in TMD and non-TMD groups and in all categories of dentistry. After a TMD diagnosis, major differences in utilization were not found when compared to patterns of treatment prior to the diagnosis. Conclusion: TMD subjects utilized 10% to 20% more dental services than non-TMD subjects. Gender and age were important factors with increased utilization in females and older patients. TMD diagnoses did not affect dental utilization patterns, indicating that most TMD patients continue to seek routine dental care.

age groups; dental care; dental insurance; dental utilization; temporomandibular disorders

1. McNeill C, Mohl ND, Rugh JD, Tanaka TT. Temporomandibular disorders: Diagnosis, management, education, and research.J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:253–263.

2. Laskin DM, Greenfield W, Gale E, et al (eds). The President’s Conference on the Examination, Diagnosis and Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1983.

3. Schiffman EL, Fricton JR, Haley DP, Shapiro BL. The prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120: 295–303.

4. McNeill C. Management of temporomandibular disorders: Concepts and controversies. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:510–522.

5. Okeson JP (ed). The American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Orofacial pain: Guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996: 113–158.

6. Rugh JD, Solberg WK. Oral health status in the United States: Temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Ed 1985;49:398–405.

7. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

8. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: Clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:273–281.

9. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, LeResche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988;32:173–183.

10. Shimshak DG, Kent RL, DeFuria MC. Medical claims profiles of subjects with temporomandibular joint disorders. J Craniomandib Pract 1997;15:150–158.

11. Shimshak DG, DeFuria MC. Health care utilization by patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. J Craniomandib Pract 1998;16:187–193.

12. White BA, Williams LA, Leben JR. Health care utilization and cost among health maintenance organization members with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:158–169.

13. National Center for Health Statistics. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision: Clinical modification. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1980.

14. American Dental Association. Current Dental Terminology; CDT-3/2000. Chicago: Author, 1999.

15. Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health 2002;23:151–169.

16. Brattberg G, Thorslund M, Wikman A. The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county in Sweden. Pain 1989;37:215–222.

17. Dao TT, LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:169–183.

18. Phipps KR, Stevens VJ. Relative contribution of caries and periodontal disease in adult tooth loss for an HMO dental population. J Public Health Dent 1995;55: 250–252.

19. Del Aguila M, Anderson M, Porterfield D, Robertson P. Patterns of oral care in a Washington state dental service population. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:343–351.

20. LeResche L, Saunders K, Von Korff MR, Barlow W, Dworkin SF. Use of exogenous hormones and temporomandibular disorder pain. Pain 1997;69:153–160.

21. Dao TT, Knight K, Ton-That V. Modulation of myofascial pain by the reproductive hormones: A preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:663–670.

22. Humphrey SP, Lindroth JE, Carlson CR. Routine dental care in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:129–134.