Article Data

  • Views 311
  • Dowloads 59

Original Research

Open Access

Short-term Effectiveness of a Prefabricated Occlusal Appliance in Patients with Myofascial Pain

  • Maria Nilner1,*,
  • EwaCarin Ekberg1
  • Marika Doepel2
  • Johanna Andersson3
  • Kirsi Selovuo
  • Yrsa Le Bell4

1Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

3Public Dental Health, Malmö, Sweden

4Graduate Programme in Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.22.3.05 Vol.22,Issue 3,September 2008 pp.209-218

Published: 30 September 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): Maria Nilner E-mail: maria.nilner@od.mah.se

Abstract

Aims: To compare the short-term effectiveness of a stabilization appliance with a prefabricated occlusal appliance in myofascial pain patients in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Sixty-five patients at 2 centers were assigned to a stabilization appliance group (S group, n = 33) or a prefabricated appliance (Relax) group (R group, n = 32). The patients had been suffering from temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain for 3 months to 40 years. The patients were examined for symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD and treated by a general practitioner. Treatment outcomes regarding pain, registered on a visual analog scale, and overall ratings of pain, registered on a verbal scale, were evaluated at 6- and 10-week follow-up appointments, and the data from the groups were compared statistically. Results: The main treatment outcome in the 2 groups was a positive improvement of overall symptoms without any statistically significant differences between groups at either 6 or 10 weeks. At the 6-week follow-up, 72% of all patients reported a 30% reduction of the worst pain, and 55%of the patients reported a 50% reduction of the worst pain, whereas at the 10-week follow-up, the percentages were 69% and 61%, respectively. According to the verbal scale, 85% of all patients reported themselves to be “better,” “much better,” or “symptom-free” at the 6-week follow-up, and 83% reported this at the 10-week follow-up. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the prefabricated occlusal appliance seemed to be the same as that of the stabilization appliance. The prefabricated appliance can therefore be recommended as a short-term therapy in adult patients with myofascial pain.

Keywords

myofascial pain; occlusal appliances; pain; randomized controlled trial; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Maria Nilner,EwaCarin Ekberg,Marika Doepel,Johanna Andersson,Kirsi Selovuo,Yrsa Le Bell. Short-term Effectiveness of a Prefabricated Occlusal Appliance in Patients with Myofascial Pain. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2008. 22(3);209-218.

References

1. Glass EG, McGlynn FD, Glaros AG. A survey of treatments for myofascial pain dysfunction. Cranio 1991;9: 165–168.

2. Glass EG, Glaros AG, McGlynn FD. Myofascial pain dysfunction: Treatments used by ADA members. Cranio 1993;11:25–29.

3. Kreiner M, Betancor E, Clark GT. Occlusal stabilization appliances: Evidence of their efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:770–777.

4. Forssell H, Kalso E, Koskela P, Vehmanen R, Puukka P, Alanen P. Occlusal treatments in temporomandibular disorders: A qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain 1999;83:549–560.

5. Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of evidencebased medicine to occlusal treatment of temporomandibular disorders: Are there lessons to be learned? J Orofac Pain 2004;18:9–22.

6. Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Sloan P, Glenny AM. Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;1:CD002778.

7. Türp JC, Komine F, Hugger A. Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain:A qualitative systematic review. Clin Oral Invest 2004;8:179–195.

8. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ, Charbonneau A, Feine JS, Lund JP. The efficacy of oral splints in the treatment of myofascial pain in the jaw muscles: A controlled clinical trial. Pain 1994;56:85–94.

9. Ekberg EC, Vallon D, Nilner M. Occlusal appliance therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A double-blind controlled study in a short-term perspective. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:122–128.

10. Ekberg EC, Nilner M. A 6- and 12-month follow-up of appliance therapy in TMD patients: A follow-up of a controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:564–570.

11. Ekberg EC, Vallon D, Nilner M. The efficacy of appliance therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders of mainly myogenous origin. A randomised, controlled, short-term trial. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:133–139.

12. Ekberg EC, Nilner M. Treatment outcome of appliance therapy in temporomandibular disorder patients with myofascial pain after 6 and 12 months. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:343–349.

13. Lindfors E, Magnusson T, Tegelberg Å. Treatment with interocclusal appliances. Swed Dent J 2006;30:123–134.

14. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988 Feb;32(2):173–183.

15. Lipton JA, Ship J, Larach-Robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:115–121.

16. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, Criteria, Examinations andSpecifications, Critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:300–354.

17. Shankland WE II. Migraine and tension-type headache reduction through pericranial muscular suppression: A preliminary report. Cranio 2001 Oct;19(4):269–278.

18. Jokstad A, Mo A, Krogstad BS. Clinical comparison between two different splint designs for temporomandibular disorder therapy. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63: 218–226.

19. Magnusson T, Adiels AM, Nilsson HL, Helkimo M. Treatment effect on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders—Comparison between stabilisation splint and a new type of splint (NTI). A pilot study. Swed Dent J 2004;28:11–20.

20. Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen H, Larsen JK. Effect of chronic and experimental jaw muscle pain on pain-pressure thresholds and stimulus-response curves. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:347–356.

21. Seymor RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME. An evaluation of length and endphase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 1985;21:177–185.

22. Farrar J, Young J Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth J, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in a chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149–158.

23. Dahlström L, Haraldson T. Immediate electromyographic response in masseter and temporal muscles to bite plates and stabilization splints. Scand J Dent Res 1989;97: 533–538.

24. Dahlström L, Haraldson T. Biteplates and stabilization splints in craniomandibular dysfunction. A clinical and electromyographic comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43:109–114.

25. Siegert R, Gundlach KKH. Stabilisationsschiene versus Entspannungsbehelf zur Behandlung myofazialer Schmerzen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989;44:17–19.

26. Baad-Hansen L, Jadidi F, Castrillon E, Thomsen PB, Svensson P. Effect of nociceptive trigeminal inhibitory splint on electromyographic activity in jaw closing muscles during sleep. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:105–111.

27. Dao TTT, Lavigne GJ. Oral splints: The crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998;9:345–361.

28. Greene SG, Laskin ML. Splint therapy for the myofascial pain-dysfunction (MPD) syndrome: A comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 1972;84:624–628.

29. Raphael K, Marbach JJ. Evidence-based care of musculoskeletal facial pain. Implications for the clinical science of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:73–79.

30. Truelove E, Hanson-Huggins K, Mancl L, Dworkin S. The efficacy of traditional, low-cost and nonsplint therapies for temporomandibular disorder. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1099–1107.

31. Feine JS, Lund JP. An assessment of the efficacy of physical therapy and physical modalities for the control of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 1997 May;71:5–23.

32. Jensen K. Quantification of tenderness by palpation and use of pressure algometers. In: Friction JR, Awad E (eds). Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, vol 17: Myofascial pain and fibromyalgia. New York: Raven Press, 1990:165–181.

33. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: Reliability, measurement effects and topographic differences. Pain 1989;37:257–263.

34. Isselée H, De Laat A, Lesaffre E, Lysens R. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom-free subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:583–587.

35. Ernberg H, Hedenberg-Magnusson B, Alstergren P, Kopp

S. Pain, allodynia, and serum serotonin level in orofacial pain of muscular origin. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:56–62.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top