Association Between Temporomandibular Joint Symptoms, Signs, and Clinical Diagnosis Using the RDC/TMD and Radiographic Findings in Temporomandibular Joint Tomograms

Aim: To identify associations between clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders and radiographic findings. Methods: Two hundred four adult patients (156 women, 48 men, mean age 40 years) with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain/sounds or changes in mandibular motion were examined according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Bilateral sagittal corrected TMJ tomograms in closed and open positions were assessed for the presence of flattening, erosion, osteophytes, and sclerosis in the joint components and the range of mandibular motion. Logistic regression analyses were performed with the radiographic findings as the dependent variables and the following clinical variables as independent variables: opening pattern, maximal jaw opening, TMJ sounds, number of painful muscle/TMJ sites, duration of pain, presence of arthritic disease, depression and somatization scores, graded chronic pain, and age and gender. Results: Coarse crepitus on opening/closing (odds ratio [OR] ≥ 3.12), on lateral excursions (odds ratio ≥ 4.06), and on protrusion (OR ≥ 5.30) was associated with increased risk of degenerative findings in tomograms. A clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis increased the risk of radiographic findings (OR ≥ 2.95) and so did increasing age (OR ≥ 1.03 per year) and the female gender (OR ≥ 2.36). Maximal assisted opening and maximal opening without pain (< 40 mm) was associated with a posterior condyle-to-articular tubercle position (OR ≥ 2.60). No other significant associations were observed. Conclusion: Age, gender, and coarse crepitus, but no pain-related variables, were associated with increased risk of degenerative findings in TMJ tomograms. Maximal opening < 40 mm was associated with a posterior condyle-to-articular tubercle relation on opening.

clinical investigation; radiography; Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders; temporomandibular joint; tomography

1. Kopp S, Rockler B. Relationship between clinical and radiographic findings in patients with mandibular pain or dysfunction.Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1979;20:465–477.

2. Hansson LG, Hansson T, Petersson A. A comparison between clinical and radiologic findings in 259 temporomandibular joint patients. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 89–94.

3. Mejersjo C, Hollender L. TMJ pain and dysfunction: Relation between clinical and radiographic findings in the short and long-term. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:241–248.

4. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA. A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res 1993;72:968–979.

5. Helenius LM, Hallikainen D, Helenius I, et al. Clinical and radiographic findings of the temporomandibular joint in patients with various rheumatic diseases. A case-control study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:455–463.

6. Kurita H, Kojima Y, Nakatsuka A, Koike T, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K. Relationship between temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-related pain and morphological changes of the TMJ condyle in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:329–333.

7. Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:192–197.

8. Limchaichana N, Petersson A, Rohlin M. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of degenerative and inflammatory temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:521–536.

9. Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B, et al. Assessment of the reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for assessment of mandibular condyle morphology using both MRI and clinical examination as the gold standard. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102: 220–224.

10. Tyndall DA, Davies KL, Ludlow JB. A comparison of zonography, multidirectional tomography, and biplanar panoramic images for detection of simulated condylar arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1995;10:277–284.

11. Ludlow JB, Davies KL, Tyndall DA. Temporomandibular joint imaging: A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bone change with biplanar multidirectional tomography and panoramic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:735–743.

12. Cholitgul W, Petersson A, Rohlin M, Tanimoto K, Akerman S. Diagnostic outcome and observer performance in sagittal tomography of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990;19:1–6.

13. Omnell K-Å, Petersson A. Radiography of the temporomandibular joint utilizing oblique lateral transcranial projections. Comparison of information obtained with standardized technique and individualized technique. Odontol Revy 1976;26:77–92.

14. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, John MT, Harkins S. Multifactorial comparison of disk displacement with and without reduction to normals according to temporomandibular joint hard tissue anatomic relationships. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:298–310.

15. Incesu L, Taskaya-Yilmaz N, Ogutcen-Toller M, Uzun E. Relationship of condylar position to disc position and morphology. Eur J Radiol 2004;51:269–273.

16. Gateno J, Anderson PB, Xia JJ, Horng JC, Teichgraeber JF, Liebschner MA. A comparative assessment of mandibular condylar position in patients with anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:39–43.

17. Di Paolo C, D’Ambrosio F, Panti F, Papa M, Mancini P. The condyle-fossa relationship in temporomandibular disorders. Considerations on the pathogenetic role of the disc. Minerva Stomatol 2006;55:409–422.

18. Ren YF, Isberg A, Westesson PL. Condyle position in the temporomandibular joint. Comparison between asymptomatic volunteers with normal disk position and patients with disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:101–107.

19. Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, Petersson A. A tomographic study of mandibular condyle position in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53: 706–713.

20. Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. Normal TMJ bony relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res 1981;60:98–104.

21. Dworkin SF, LeResche L (eds). Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

22. John MT, Dworkin SF, Mancl LA. Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Pain 2005;118: 61–69.

23. Dworkin SF, Sherman J, Mancl L, Ohrbach R, LeResche L, Truelove E. Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the research diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: Depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain. J Orofac Pain 2002; 16:207–220.

24. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:240–253.

25. Manfredini D, Segu M, Bertacci A, Binotti G, Bosco M. Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders according to RDC/TMD axis I findings, a multicenter Italian study. Minerva Stomatol 2004;53:429–438.

26. McNeill C (ed). Temporomandibular Disorders. Guidelines for Classification, Assessment and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1993.

27. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–324.

28. Wiese M, Hintze H, Svensson P, Wenzel A. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:12–17.

29. Yap AU, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KB, Tan HH. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychosocial dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21–28.

30. Tanimoto K, Petersson A, Rohlin M, Hansson LG, Johansen CC. Comparison of computed with conventional tomography in the evaluation of temporomandibular joint disease: A study of autopsy specimens. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990;19:21–27.

31. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. Improved interaction models of temporomandibular joint anatomic relationships in asymptomatic subjects and patients with disc displacement with or without reduction. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:192–202.

32. Petrikowski CG, Grace MG. Age and gender differences in temporomandibular joint radiographic findings before orthodontic treatment in adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:380–385.

33. Widmalm SE, Westesson PL, Kim IK, Pereira FJ Jr, Lundh H, Tasaki MM. Temporomandibular joint pathosis related to sex, age, and dentition in autopsy material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:416–425.

34. Pereira FJ Jr, Lundh H, Westesson PL. Morphologic changes in the temporomandibular joint in different age groups. An autopsy investigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:279–287.

35. Ishibashi H, Takenoshita Y, Ishibashi K, Oka M. Agerelated changes in the human mandibular condyle: A morphologic, radiologic, and histologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1016–1023.

36. Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Zitting P, Raustia M. Panoramic findings in 34-year-old subjects with facial pain and pain-free controls. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:456–462.