Article Data

  • Views 318
  • Dowloads 34

Original Research

Open Access

Prediction of Postoperative Pain After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

  • Åsa Rudin1,*,
  • Lars Eriksson2,3
  • Rolf Liedholm2,3
  • Thomas List4
  • Mads U. Werner5

1Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, S-22185 Lund, Sweden

2Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral Surg & Oral Med, Malmo, Sweden

3Malmo Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden

4Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Stomatognath Physiol, Malmo, Sweden

5Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.24.2.07 Vol.24,Issue 2,June 2010 pp.189-196

Published: 30 June 2010

*Corresponding Author(s): Åsa Rudin E-mail: asa.rudin@skane.se

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the predictive potential of preoperative psychological and psychophysiological variables in estimating severity of postoperative pain following mandibular third molar surgery (MTMS). Methods: Following ethical committee approval and informed consent, 40 consecutive patients scheduled for MTMS were included. Preoperative psychometric indicators of anxiety, depression, and vulnerability were evaluated by patient question-naires. Thermal thresholds and heat pain perception (1 second phasic stimuli: 44°C to 48°C) were evaluated with quantitative sensory testing techniques. Standardized surgery was performed during local anesthesia. Postoperative pain management was with rescue paracetamol and ibuprofen. The patients were instructed to record each day their pain at rest and during dynamic conditions, and their requirement of analgesics for 14 days following surgery. Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. Eight patients were readmitted because of pain. During the postoperative period, one or more episodes of moderate to severe pain (> 30 on a visual analog scale) was reported by 60% (23/38) at rest, 63% (24/38) during mouth-opening, and 73% (28/38) during eating. In a multiple regression model, the combination of psychological vulnerability and heat pain perception rendered a predictive model that could account for 15 to 30% of the variance in postoperative pain during resting and dynamic conditions (P = .03 to .001).Conclusion: Implementation of clinically relevant preoperative screening methods may offer more efficacious postoperative pain therapies to pain-susceptible individuals undergoing mandibular third molar surgery.

Keywords

mandibular third molar surgery;pain measurement/methods;pain postoperative;predictive value of tests;quantitative sensory testing

Cite and Share

Åsa Rudin,Lars Eriksson,Rolf Liedholm,Thomas List,Mads U. Werner. Prediction of Postoperative Pain After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010. 24(2);189-196.

References

1. Nordenram A, Hultin M, Kjellman O, Ramstrom G. Indications for surgical removal of the mandibular third molar. Study of 2,630 cases. Swed Dent J 1987;11:23–29.

2. Moller PL, Sindet-Pedersen S, Petersen CT, Juhl GI, Dillenschneider A, Skoglund LA. Onset of acetaminophen analgesia: Comparison of oral and intravenous routes after third molar surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:642–648.

3. Benediktsdottir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: Risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and compli-cations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:438–446.

4. Colorado-Bonnin M, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35: 343–347.

5. Benhamou D, Berti M, Brodner G, et al. Postoperative analgesic therapy observational survey (PATHOS): A practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries. Pain 2008;136:134–141.

6. Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, et al. Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology 2006;104:417–425.

7. Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, et al. Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:1265–1271.

8. Borly L, Anderson IB, Bardram L, et al. Preoperative prediction model of outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34: 1144–1152.

9. Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain 2003;105:415–423.

10. Rudin A, Wolner-Hanssen P, Hellbom M, Werner MU. Prediction of post-operative pain after a laparoscopic tubal ligation procedure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:138–145.

11. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 2001;90:261–269.

12. Ozalp G, Sarioglu R, Tuncel G, Aslan K, Kadiogullari N. Preoperative emotional states in patients with breast cancer and postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:26–29.

13. Granot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: A prospective study. Clin J Pain 2005;21:439–445.

14. Hsu YW, Somma J, Hung YC, Tsai PS, Yang CH, Chen CC. Predicting postoperative pain by preoperative pressure pain assessment. Anesthesiology 2005;103:613–618.

15. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1422–1426.


16. Werner MU, Duun P, Kehlet H. Prediction of postoperative pain by preoperative nociceptive responses to heat stimulation. Anesthesiology 2004;100:115–119.

17. Nielsen PR, Norgaard L, Rasmussen LS, Kehlet H. Prediction of post-operative pain by an electrical pain stimulus. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:582–586.

18. de C Williams AC. Measures of function and psychology. In: Wall PD, Melzack R (eds). Textbook of Pain. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1999:427–444.

19. Burckhardt CS, Bjelle A. A Swedish version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol 1994;23:77–81.

20. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres?Pain 1997;72:95–97.

21. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:17–24.

22. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996.

23. Gray A, Kehlet H, Bonnet F, Rawal N. Predicting postop-erative analgesia outcomes: NNT league tables or procedure-specific evidence? Br J Anaesth 2005;94:710–714.

24. Aasvang EK, Hansen JB, Kehlet H. Can preoperative electrical nociceptive stimulation predict acute pain after groin herniotomy? J Pain 2008;9:940–944.

25. Oosterink FM, de Jough A, Aartman IH. What are people afraid of during dental treatment? Anxiety-provoking capacity of 67 stimuli characteristic of the dental setting. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:44–51.

26. Diatchenko L, Nackley AG, Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Maixner W. Idiopathic pain disorders: Pathways of vulnerability. Pain 2006;123:226–230.

27. Armfield JM, Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Cognitive vulnerabil-ity and dental fear. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:2.

28. Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, Borgonovo A, Creminelli L, Santoro F. Assessing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: A prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:901–917.

29. Lago-Mendez L, niz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:979–983.

30. Conrad SM, Blakey GH, Shugars DA, Marciani RD, Phillips C, White RP Jr. Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:1288–1294.

31. Moore A, Edwards J, Barden J, McQuay H. Pain: There’s a Lot of it About. Bandolier’s Little Book of Pain. New York: Oxford University, 2003:7–13.

32. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367: 1618–1625.

33. Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: A public health hazard. Am J Public Health 2007; 97:1554–1559.

34. Berge TI. Incidence of chronic neuropathic pain subsequent to surgical removal of impacted third molars. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:108–112.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top