Article Data

  • Views 298
  • Dowloads 61

Original Research

Open Access

Painful Conditioning Stimuli of the Craniofacial Region Evokes Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls in Men and Women

  • Kelun Wang1,5,*,
  • Peter Svensson2
  • Barry J. Sessle3
  • Brian E. Cairns4
  • Lars Arendt-Nielsen1

1Univ Aalborg, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact, Orofacial Pain Lab, DK-9220 Aalborg E, Denmark

2Univ Aarhus, Sch Dent, Dept Clin Oral Physiol, Aarhus C, Denmark

3Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Toronto, ON, Canada

4Univ British Columbia, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada

5Aalborg Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aalborg, Denmark

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.24.3.04 Vol.24,Issue 3,September 2010 pp.255-261

Published: 30 September 2010

*Corresponding Author(s): Kelun Wang E-mail: kelun@smi.auc.dk

Abstract

Aims: To compare the modulatory effects of tonic mechanical or thermal craniofacial painful conditioning stimuli on pain sensitivity in craniofacial and spinal test sites in healthy men and women. Methods: Mechanical and cold headbands were developed and tested on 12 healthy men and 12 age-matched women (mean ± SEM: 27 ± 1.5 years). The pressure applied by the mechanical headband around the skull above the eyebrows could be adjusted over time via feedback from a 0 to 10 electronic visual analog scale (VAS) to maintain the pain intensity at a given level for 10 minutes (3 to 7 on VAS). The cold headband consisted of a series of plastic bags filled with antifreeze water having a temperature of approx 3°C. During the 10 minutes of application, the subjects were asked to rate the pain intensity on a 10-cm VAS. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were recorded over the right and left masseter muscles (MAR, MAL), right splenius muscle (neck), right elbow (elbow), and right middle finger (finger) by a pressure algometer (1-cm2 area probe). The PPTs at each of the five sites were determined at baseline and during the mechanical or cold-induced pain. The two sessions with mechanical or cold headbands were performed at an interval of 30 minutes. Results: Women had significantly lower absolute PPT values than men at most test sites (Unpaired t-test: P < .027). The mechanical headband caused pain in both men (peak pain mean ± SEM: 4.7 ± 0.4 cm) and women (4.9 ± 0.4 cm) (P = .455). A significant PPT elevation was found at MAR, MAL, neck, and finger in men (11% to 17%; P < .031) and at MAR, MAL, and neck in women (15% to 22%; P < .020) during the mechanical-induced pain. The cold headband caused pain in both men (4.0 ± 0.4 cm) and women (4.5 ± 0.4 cm) (P = .285). During the cold-induced pain, a significant PPT elevation was found at all test sites in men (P < .023) and at all sites (P < .021) except for the finger in women. The relative changes in PPT values were not significantly different between men and women at any test site (unpaired t-test: P > .446). Conclusion: This study has documented that mechanical and thermal painful tonic stimuli applied to the craniofacial region can evoke diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC)-like effects in the craniofacial region as well as spinally innervated areas, but without sex differences.

Keywords

DNIC;human experimental pain models;sensory physiology;trigeminal pain

Cite and Share

Kelun Wang,Peter Svensson,Barry J. Sessle,Brian E. Cairns,Lars Arendt-Nielsen. Painful Conditioning Stimuli of the Craniofacial Region Evokes Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls in Men and Women. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010. 24(3);255-261.

References

1. Talbot JD, Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Boyer M. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs): Psychophysical evidence in man for intersegmental suppression of noxious heat perception by cold pressor pain. Pain 1987;30: 221–232.

2. De Broucker T, Cesaro P, Willer JC, Le Bars D. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in man. Involvement of the spinoreticular tract. Brain 1990;113:1223–1234.

3. Arendt-Nielsen L, Gotliebsen K. Segmental inhibition of laser-evoked brain potentials by ipsi- and contralaterally applied cold pressor pain. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992;64:56–61.

4. Graven-Nielsen T, Babenko V, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Experimentally induced muscle pain induces hypoalgesia in heterotopic deep tissues, but not in homotopic deep tissues. Brain Res 1998;787:203–210.

5. Witting N, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. Differential effect of painful heterotopic stimulation on capsaicin induced pain and allodynia. Brain Res 1998; 801:206–210.

6. Svensson P, Hashikawa CH, Casey KL. Site and modality specific modulation of experimental muscle pain in humans. Brain Res 1999;851:32–38.

7. Reinert A, Treede RD, Bromm B. The pain inhibiting pain effect: An electrophysiological study in humans. Brain Res 2000;862:103–110.

8. Bouhassira D, Danziger N, Atta N, Guirimand F. Comparison of the pain suppressive effects of clinical and experimental painful conditioning stimuli. Brain 2003; 126:1068–1078.

9. Serrao M, Rossi P, Sandrini G, et al. Effects of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls on temporal summation of the RIII reflex in humans. Pain 2004;112: 353–360.

10. Carlsson GE, LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders. In: Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA (eds). Temporomandibular Disorders and Related Pain Conditions. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Seattle: IASP, 1995:211–226.

11. Dao TT, LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:169–184.

12. Riley JL III, Gilbert GH. Orofacial pain symptoms: An interaction between age and sex. Pain 2001;90:245–256.

13. Staud R, Robinson ME, Vierck CJ Jr, Price DD. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) attenuate temporal summation of second pain in normal males but not in nor-mal females or fibromyalgia patients. Pain 2003;101: 167–174.

14. Sarlani E, Grace EG, Reynolds MA, Greenspan JD. Evidence for up-regulated central nociceptive processing in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:41–55.

15. France CR, Suchowiecki S. A comparison of noxious inhibitory controls in men and women. Pain 1999;81: 77–84.

16. Baad-Hansen L, Poulsen HF, Jensen HM, Svensson P. Lack of sex differences in modulation of experimental intraoral pain by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). Pain 2005;116:359–365.

17. Ge HY, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sex differences in temporal characteristics of descending inhibitory control: An evaluation using repeated bilateral experimental induc-tion of muscle pain. Pain 2004;110:72–78.

18. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

19. Wolff HG. Headache and Other Head Pain. New York: Oxford University, 1963.

20. Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen H, Larsen JK. Effect of chronic and experimental jaw muscle pain on pain-pressure thresholds and stimulus-response curves. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:347–356.

21. Larivière M, Goffaux P, Marchand S, Julien N. Changes in pain perception and descending inhibitory controls start at middle age in healthy adults. Clin J Pain 2007;23: 506–510.

22. Lowe AA, Gurza S, Sessle BJ. Excitatory and inhibitory influences on tongue muscle activity in cat and monkey. Brain Res 1976;113:417–422.

23. Gurza S, Lowe AA, Sessle BJ. Influences on masseter activity of stimuli applied to various sites in cats and macaque monkeys. Arch Oral Biol 1976;21:705-707.

24. Sessle BJ, Hu JW, Dubner R, Lucier GE. Functional properties of neurons in cat trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn). II. Modulation of responses to noxious and nonnoxious stimuli by periaqueductal gray, nucleus raphe magnus, cerebral cortex, and afferent influences, and effect of naloxone. J Neurophysiol 1981;45: 193–207.

25. Dubner R, Sessle BJ, Storey TA. The Neural Basis of Oral and Facial Function. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

26. Cadden SW. Modulation of human jaw reflexes: Heterotopic stimuli and stress. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52: 370–373.

27. Villanueva L, Le Bars D. The activation of bulbospinal controls by peripheral nociceptive inputs: Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. Biol Res 1995;28:113–125.

28. Hu JW. Response properties of nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurons in the rat's trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) related to cutaneous and deep craniofacial afferent stimulation and modulation by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. Pain 1990; 41:331–345.

29. Le Bars D. The whole body receptive field of dorsal horn multireceptive neurons. Brain Res Rev 2002;40:29–44.

30. Millan MJ. Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol 2002;66:355–474.

31. Bouhassira D, Bing Z, Le Bars D. Studies of brain structures involved in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in the rat: The rostral ventromedial medulla. J Physiol 1993;463: 667–687.

32. Fujii K, Motohashi K, Umino M. Heterotopic ischemic pain attenuates somatosensory evoked potentials induced by electrical tooth stimulation: Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in the trigeminal nerve territory. Eur J Pain 2006; 10:495–504.

33. Ellrich J, Treede RD. Characterization of blink reflex interneurons by activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in man. Brain Res 1998;803:161–168.

34. Serrao M, Rossi P, Parisi L, et al. Trigemino-cervicalspinal reflexes in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114: 1697–1703.

35. Giffin NJ, Katsarava Z, Pfundstein A, Ellrich J, Kaube H. The effect of multiple stimuli on the modulation of the “nociceptive” blink reflex. Pain 2004;108:124–128.

36. Ge HY, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Gender differences in pain modulation evoked by repeated injections of glutamate into the human trapezius muscle. Pain 2005; 113:134–140.

37. Arendt-Nielsen L, Sluka KA, Nie HL. Experimental muscle pain impairs descending inhibition. Pain 2008;140: 465–471.

38. Sherman JJ, LeResche L, Huggins KH, Mancl LA, Sage JC, Dworkin SF. The relationship of somatization and depression to experimental pain response in women with temporomandibular disorders. Psychosom Med 2004;66: 852–860.

39. Yap AU, Chua EK, Tan KB, Chan YH. Relationships between depression/somatization and self-reports of pain and disability. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:220–225.

40. Keogh E, Eccleston C. Sex differences in adolescent chronic pain and pain-related coping. Pain 2006;123: 275–284.

41. Wijnhoven HA, de Vet HC, Picavet HS. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders is systematically higher in women than in men. Clin J Pain 2006;22:717–724.

42. Castrillon EE, Cairns BE, Ernberg M, et al. Effect of a peripheral NMDA receptor antagonist on glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain and mechanical sensitization in women. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:216–224.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top