Article Data

  • Views 304
  • Dowloads 32

Original Research

Open Access

Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Trigeminal Region: Site and Gender Differences

  • Renata Matos
  • Kelun Wang1,2,3,*,
  • Janek Dalsgaard Jensen2
  • Thomas Jensen2
  • Bjarne Neuman2
  • Peter Svensson4,5
  • Lars Arendt-Nielsen

1Aalborg Univ, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact SMI, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark

2Aalborg Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aalborg, Denmark

3Nanjing Med Univ, Stomatol Sch & Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China

4Univ Aarhus, Dept Clin Oral Physiol, Aarhus, Denmark

5Aarhus Univ Hosp, CFIN, MindLab, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark

DOI: 10.11607/jofph.25.2.09 Vol.25,Issue 2,June 2011 pp.161-169

Published: 30 June 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): Kelun Wang E-mail: kelun@hst.aau.dk

Abstract

Aims: To establish a quantitative sensory testing (QST) profile in the trigeminal (V) area and test for site and gender differences in healthy humans. Methods: A standardized QST protocol was applied on 15 healthy men (age range: 18 to 25 years old) and 15 age-matched women, and the sensitivity was examined bilaterally in facial sites supplied by the infraorbital (V2) and mental (V3) nerves. The cold detection threshold (CDT), cold pain threshold (CPT), warm detection threshold (WDT), heat pain threshold (HPT), thermal sensory limen (TSL), mechanical detection threshold (MDT), mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS), mechanical pain threshold (MPT), dynamic mechanical allodynia (ALL), windup ratio (WUR), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and vibration detection threshold (VDT) were determined. Data were tested with ANOVAs for repeated measures and post-hoc comparisons were calculated using Bonferroni tests. Results: There were significant gender differences with lower threshold (higher sensitivity) in women for CDT (P = .030) and PPT (P = .006). A significantly lower threshold (higher sensitivity) was detected for HPT (P < .001), and significantly higher thresholds (lower sensitivity) for VDT (P < .001) and CDT (P < .001) in V2 compared to V3. There were no significant right-to-left side differences for any of the QST parameters. Conclusion: Application of this standardized QST protocol may allow for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms from somatosensory phenotypes and provide basic information for the study of sensory dysfunctions in the V area.

Keywords

craniofacial pain;gender difference;human;quantitative sensory testing (QST);trigeminal system

Cite and Share

Renata Matos,Kelun Wang,Janek Dalsgaard Jensen,Thomas Jensen,Bjarne Neuman,Peter Svensson,Lars Arendt-Nielsen. Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Trigeminal Region: Site and Gender Differences. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2011. 25(2);161-169.

References

1.Drobek W, De Laat A, Schoenaers J. Tactile threshold and pressure pain threshold during treatment of orofacial pain: An explorative study. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:185–193.

2.Jacobs R, Wu CH, Van Loven K, Desnyder M, Kolenaar B, Van Steenberghed D. Methodology of oral sensory tests. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:720–730.

3.Jääskeläinen SK. Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:85–107.

4.Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Thygesen T, Juhl GI, Jensen TS. Overview on tools and methods to assess neuropathic trigeminal pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:332–338.

5.Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

6.Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: A comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006;10:77–88.

7.Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123:231–243.

8.Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. J Pain 2009;10:556–572.

9.Baad-Hansen L, Arima T, Arendt-Nielsen L, NeumannJensen B, Svensson P. Quantitative sensory tests before and 1(1/2) years after orthognathic surgery: A cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:313–321.

10.Pfau DB, Rolke R, Nickel R, Treede RD, Daublaender M. Somatosensory profiles in subgroups of patients with myogenic temporomandibular disorders and fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2009;147:72–83.

11.List T, Leijon G, Svensson P. Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. Pain 2009; 139:333–341.

12.Eliav E, Gracely RH, Nahlieli O, Benoliel R. Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal nerve damage assessment. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:339–344.

13.Juhl GI, Jensen TS, Norholt SE, Svensson P. Central sensitization phenomena after third molar surgery: A quantitative sensory testing study. Eur J Pain 2008;12:116–127.

14.Kazkayasi M, Ergin A, Ersoy M, Bengi O, Tekdemir I, Ethan A. Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen-canal and groove: An anatomic and cephalometric study. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:609–614.

15.Kazkayasi M, Ergin A, Ersoy M, Tekdemir I, Ethan A. Microscopic anatomy of the infraorbital canal, nerve and foramen. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:692–697.

16.Baumgärtner U, Magerl W, Klein T, Hopf HC, Treede RD. Neurogenic hyperalgesia versus painful hypoalgesia: Two distinct mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Pain 2002;96:141–151.

17.Chan AW, MacFarlane IA, Bowsher D, Campbell JA. Weighted needle pinprick sensory thresholds: A simple test of sensory function in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1992;55:56–59.

18.Greenspan JD, McGillis SL. Thresholds for the perception of pressure, sharpness, and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain: Effects of laterality and repeated testing. Somatosens Mot Res 1994;11:311–317.

19.Ziegler EA, Magerl W, Meyer RA, Treede RD. Secondary hyperalgesia to punctate mechanical stimuli. Central sensitization to A-fibre nociceptor input. Brain 1999;122:2245–2257.

20.Komiyama O, De Laat A. Tactile and pain thresholds in the intra- and extra-oral regions of symptom-free subjects. Pain 2005;115:308–315.

21.Fagius J, Wahren LK. Variability of sensory threshold determination in clinical use. J Neurol Sci 1981;51:11–27.

22. Goldberg JM, Lindblom U. Standardised method of deter-mining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:793–803.

23.Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Lous I, Olesen J. Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population. Pain 1992;48:197–203.

24.Fillingim RB, Maixner W. The influence of resting blood pressure and gender on pain response. Psychosom Med 1996;58:326–332.

25.Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen H, Larsen JK. Effect of chronic and experimental jaw muscle pain on pain-pressure thresholds and stimulus-response curves. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:347–356.

26.Riley JL III, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: A metaanalysis. Pain 1998;74:181–187.

27.Fillingim RB. Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different. Curr Rev Pain 2000;4:24–30.

28.Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright CC. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain 2003;101:259–266.

29.Ayesh EE, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Somatosensory function following painful repetitive electrical stimulation of the human temporomandibular joint and skin. Exp Brain Res 2007;179:415–425.

30.Fillingim RB, Hastie BA, Ness TJ, Glover TL, Campbell CM, Staud R. Sex-related psychological predictors of baseline pain perception and analgesic responses to pentazocine. Biol Psychol 2005;69:97–112.

31.Fillingim RB, Ness TJ, Glover TL, et al. Morphine responses and experimental pain: Sex differences in side effects and cardiovascular responses but not analgesia. J Pain 2005;6:116–124.

32.Komiyama O, Kawara M, De Laat A. Ethnic differences regarding tactile and pain thresholds in the trigeminal region. J Pain 2007;8:363–369.

33.Garcia E, Godoy-Izquierdo D, Godoy JF, Perez M, LopezChicheri I. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in a repeated measures assessment. Psychol Health Med 2007; 12:567–579.

34.Fillingim RB, Maixner W. Gender differences in the response to noxious stimuli. Pain Forum 1995;4:209–221.

35.Fillingim RB, Edwards RR, Powell T. The relationship of sex and clinical pain to experimental pain responses. Pain 1999;83:419–425.

36.Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Girdler SS, et al. Ischemic but not thermal pain sensitivity varies across the menstrual cycle. Psychosom Med 1997;59:512–520.

37.Pfleeger M, Straneva PA, Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Girdler SS. Menstrual cycle, blood pressure and ischemic pain sensitivity in women: A preliminary investigation. Int J Psychophysiol 1997;27:161–166.

38.Isselée H, De Laat A, Bogaerts K, Lysens R. Long-term fluctuations of pressure pain thresholds in healthy men, normally menstruating women and oral contraceptive users. Eur J Pain 2001;5:27–37.

39.Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, et al. Consensus Working Group of the Sex, Gender, and Pain SIG of the IASP. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report. Pain 2007;132:26–45.

40.Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, RahimWilliams B, Riley JL III. Sex, gender, and pain: A review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain 2009;10:447–485.

41.Fillingim RB, Keefe FJ, Light KC, Booker DK, Maixner W. The influence of gender and psychological factors on pain perception. J Gender Cult Health 1996;1:21–36.

42.Otto MW, Dougher MJ. Sex differences and personality factors in responsivity to pain. Percept Mot Skills 1985; 61:383–390.

43.Dougher MJ, Crossen JR, Ferraro DP, Garland R. The effects of covert sensitization on preference for sexual stimuli: A preliminary analogue experiment. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1987;18:337–348.

44.Tur E. Physiology of the skin: Differences between women and men. Clin Dermatol 1997;15:5–16.

45.Cairns BE, Hu JW, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ, Svensson P. Sex-related differences in human pain and rat afferent discharge evoked by injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:782–791.

46.Cairns BE, Wang K, Hu JW, Sessle BJ, Arendt-Nielsen L, Svensson P. The effect of glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain on the human jaw-stretch reflex differs in men and women. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:317–325.

47.Gazerani P, Wang K, Cairns BE, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Effects of subcutaneous administration of glutamate on pain, sensitization and vasomotor responses in healthy men and women. Pain 2006;124:338–348.

48.Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Farina D, Madeleine P. Genderspecific differences in electromyographic changes and perceived pain induced by experimental muscle pain during sustained contractions of the upper trapezius muscle. Muscle Nerve 2005;32:726–733.

49.Ge HY, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Gender differences in pain modulation evoked by repeated injections of glutamate into the human trapezius muscle. Pain 2005;113: 134–140.

50.Bi R, Broutman G, Foy MR, Thompson RF, Baudry M. The tyrosine kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediate multiple effects of estrogen in hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000;97:3602–3607.

51.Gazzaley AH, Weiland NG, Mcewen BS, Morrison JH. Differential regulation of NMDAR1 mRNA and protein by estradiol in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 1996;16: 6830–6838.

52.Wasner GL, Brock JA. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119: 2389–2395.

53.Van Sickels JE, Zysset M, Nishioka GJ, Thrash WJ. A comparative study of normal sensibility of the inferior alveolar nerve and the infraorbital nerve. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:255–257.

54.Green BG, Gelhard B. Perception of temperature on oral and facial skin. Somatosens Res 1987;4:191–200.

55.Chen CC, Essick GK, Kelly DG, Young MG, Nestor JM, Masse B. Gender, side and site dependent variations in human perioral spatial resolution. Arch Oral Biol 1995; 40:539–548.

56.Posnick JC, Zimbler AG, Grossman JA. Normal cutaneous sensibility of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86: 429–433.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top