Head and Cervical Posture in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders

Aim: To determine whether patients with myogenous or mixed (ie, myogeneous plus arthrogeneous) temporomandibular disorders (TMD) had different head and cervical posture measured through angles commonly used in clinical research settings when compared to healthy individuals. Methods: One hundred fifty-four persons participated in this study. Of these, 50 subjects were healthy, 55 subjects had myogenous TMD, and 49 subjects had mixed TMD (ie, arthrogenous plus myogenous TMD). A lateral photograph was taken with the head in the self-balanced position. Four angles were measured in the photographs: (1) Eye-Tragus-Horizontal, (2) Tragus-C7-Horizontal, (3) Pogonion-Tragus-C7, and (4) Tragus-C7-Shoulder. Alcimagen software specially designed to measure angles was used in this study. All of the measurements were performed by a single trained rater, a dental specialist in orthodontics, blinded to each subject’s group status. Results: The only angle that reached statistical significance among groups was the Eye-Tragus-Horizontal (F = 3.03, P = .040). Pairwise comparisons determined that a mean difference of 3.3 degrees (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.15, 6.41) existed when comparing subjects with myogenous TMD and healthy sub-jects (P = .036). Postural angles were not significantly related to neck disability, jaw disability, or pain intensity. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the measurements were excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranging between 0.996–0.998. Conclusion: The only statistically significant difference in craniocervical posture between patients with myogenous TMD and healthy subjects was for the Eye-Tragus-Horizontal angle, indicating a more extended position of the head. However, the difference was very small (3.3 degrees) and was judged not to be clinically significant.

cervical posture;head posture;photographs;reliability;temporomandibular disorders

1.Bonney RA, Corlett EN. Head posture and loading of the cervical spine. Appl Ergon 2002;33:415 –417.

2.McLean L. The effect of postural correction on muscle activation amplitudes recorded from the cervicobrachial region. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005;15:527–535.

3.Yamabe Y, Yamashita R, Fujii H. Head, neck and trunk movements accompanying jaw tapping. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:900–905.

4.Schwarz A. Positions of the head and malrelations of the jaws. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr 1928;14:56–68.

5.Preiskel H. Some observations on the postural position of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:625–633.

6.Posselt U. Studies in the mobility of the human mandible. Acta Odontol Scand 1952;10:1–153.

7.McLean LF, Brenman HS, Friedman MG. Effects of changing body position on dental occlusion. J Dent Res 1970;52:1041–1045.

8.Solow B, Tallgren A. Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;44:417–435.

9.Goldstein DF, Kraus SL, Williams WB, Glasheen-Wray M. Influence of cervical posture on mandibular movement. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:421–426.

10.Gonzalez HE, Manns A. Forward head posture: Its structural and functional influence on the stomatognathic system: A conceptual study. Cranio 1996;14:71–80.

11.Visscher CM, Slater J, Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Kinematics of the human mandible for different head posture. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:299–305.

12.Funakoshi M, Fujita N, Takehana S. Relations between occlusal interference and jaw muscle activities in response to changes in head position. J Dent Res 1976;55:684–690.

13.Armijo-Olivo S, Bravo J, Magee DJ, Thie NMR, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. The association between head and cervical posture and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:9–23.

14.Stevens J. K group manova: A priori and post hoc procedures. In: Stevens J (ed). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:208–255,626–629.

15.Gremillion HA, Mahan PE. The prevalence and etiology of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. Tex Dent J 2000:117:30–39.

16.Magee D. Cervical spine orthopedic physical assessment. In: Magee D (ed). Orthopedic Physical Assessment. St Louis: Elsevier Sciences, 2002:121–182.

17.Magee D. Assessment of posture. In: Magee D (ed). Orthopedic Physical Assessment. St Louis: Elsevier Sciences, 2002:873–897.

18.Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres?Pain 1997;72:95–97.

19.Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

20.Fricton J. Physical evaluation: The need for a standardized examination. In: Fricton JR (ed). Temporomandibular Joint and Craniofacial Pain: Diagnosis and Management. St Louis: Ishiyaku Euroamerica, 1988:46–47.

21.Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. Reliability of a craniomandibular index. J Dent Res 1986;65:1359–1364.

22.Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. The craniomandibular index: Validity. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:222–228.

23.Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, De Leeuw JR, Steenks MH, Bosman F, Buchner R, Olthoff LW. Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part I: Self-report data and clinical findings. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:24–36.

24.De Wijer A, Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, Steenks MH, Bosman F. Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:181–191.

25.Conti PCR, De Azevedo LR, De Souza NVW, Ferreira FV. Pain measurement in TMD patients: Evaluation of precision and sensitivity of different scales. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28:534–539.

26.Koho P, Aho S, Hurri H, Watson P. Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: Reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:128–132.

27.Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:279–283.

28.McCarthy M Jr, Chang CH, Gibbs J, et al. Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:245–252.

29.Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14:409–415.

30. Sugisaki M, Kino K, Yoshida N, Ishikawa T, Amagasa T, Haketa T. Development of a new questionnaire to assess pain-related limitations of daily functions in Japanese patients with temporomandibular disorders. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:384–395.

31.Vernon H. The neck disability index: State-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31:491–502.

32.Sandoval P, Henriquez J, Fuentes R, Cabezas G, Roldan R. Cervical curve: Cephalometric study in rest clinical position. Rev Med Chil 1999;127:547–555.

33.Cooke MS, Wei SH. The reproducibility of natural head posture: A methodological study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:280–288.

34.Gadotti IC, Berzin F, Biasotto-Gonzalez D. Preliminary rapport on head posture and muscle activity in subjects with class I and II. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:794–799.

35.Cesar GM, Tosato JP, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA. Correlation between occlusion and cervical posture in patients with bruxism. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27:463–466.

36.Silva AG, Punt TD, Sharples P, Vilas-Boas JP, Johnson MI. Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: A comparison between patients and pain-free persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:669–674.

37.Evcik D, Aksoy O. Relationship between head posture and temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome. J Musculoskelet Pain 2004;12:19–24.

38.Edmondston SJ, Chan HY, Chi Wing Ngai G, et al. Postural neck pain: An investigation of habitual sitting posture, perception of “good” posture and cervicothoracic kinaesthesia. Man Ther 2007;12:363–371.

39.Raine S, Twomey L. Posture of the head, shoulders and thoracic spine in comfortable erect standing. Aust J Physiother 1994;40:25–32.

40.Chansirinukor W, Wilson D, Grimmer K, Dansie B. Effects of backpacks on students: Measurement of cervical and shoulder posture. Aust J Physiother 2001;47:110–116.

41.Johnson GM. The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae. Spine 1998;23:921–927.

42.Streiner D, Norman G. Validity. In: Streiner D, Norman G (eds). Health Measurements Scales. Oxford: Oxford University, 2004:172–193.

43.Portney L, Watkins M. Power and sample size. In: Mehalik C (ed). Foundations of Clinical Research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health, 2000:705–730.

44.Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101–110.

45.Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–428.

46.Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231-240.

47.McDowell I. The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurements. In: McDowell I (ed). Measuring Health. New York: Oxford University, 2006:10–54.

48.Gadotti IC, Magee DJ. Validity of surface measurements to assess craniocervical posture in the sagittal plane: A critical review. Phys Ther Rev 2008;13:258–268.

49.Visscher CM, De Boer W, Lobbezoo F, Habets LLMH, Naeije M. Is there a relationship between head posture and craniomandibular pain? J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1030–1036.

50.Chiao L, Guedes Z, Vieira M. Relationship between physical global posture and temporomandibular joint dysfunction: Masticatory muscle overactivity. Fisioterapia Brasil 2003;4:341–347.

51.Harrison AL, Barry-Greb T, Wojtowicz G. Clinical measurement of head and shoulder posture variables. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996;23:353–361.

52.Huggare JA, Raustia AM. Head posture and cervicovertebral and craniofacial morphology in patients with craniomandibular dysfunction. Cranio 1992;10:173–177.

53.Kritsineli M, Shim YS. Malocclusion, body posture, and temporomandibular disorder in children with primary and mixed dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1992;16:86–93.

54.Lee WY, Okeson JP, Lindroth J. The relationship between forward head posture and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:161–167.

55.Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Temporomandibular disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head posture and bite force in children selected for orthodontic treat-ment. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:179–192.

56.Nicolakis P, Nicolakis M, Piehslinger E, et al. Relationship between craniomandibular disorders and poor posture. Cranio 2000;18:106–112.

57.Armijo S, Frugone R, Wahl F, Gaete J. Clinic and teleradiographic alterations in patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction. Kinesiologia 2001;64:82–87.

58.Braun BL. Postural differences between asymptomatic men and women and craniofacial pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:653–656.

59.Falla D, Jull G, Russell T, Vicenzino B, Hodges P. Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther 2007;87:408–417.

60.Kraus S. Temporomandibular disorders, head and orofacial pain: Cervical spine considerations. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:161–193.

61.Visscher CM, de Boer W, Naeije M. The relationship between posture and curvature of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998;21:388–391.