Effects of Experimental Occlusal Interferences in Individuals Reporting Different Levels of Wake-Time Parafunctions

Aims: To test the hypothesis that the effects of an experimental occlusal interference differ between individuals reporting a high or low frequency of wake-time oral parafunctions. Methods: Study participants reporting very high (HFP group; n = 10) or very low (LFP group; n = 10) levels of oral parafunctions were selected by means of a questionnaire administered to 200 medical students. The selected participants wore an experimental occlusal interference in a single-blind longitudinal study, which comprised different occlusal conditions: interference free (IFC) and active occlusal interference (AIC). Assessments included clinical examination, measurements of nonfunctional tooth contacts, state and trait anxiety, and visual analog scale scores for occlusal discomfort, masticatory muscle pain, and headache. Data were analyzed by repeated measures twoway analysis of variance on ranked data, followed by calculation of within- and between-group differences using Friedman tests and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Results: During AIC, the frequency of nonfunctional tooth contacts significantly decreased in both groups (median [interquartile range, IQR]: in HFP from 55.3% [60.0%] to 31.1% [33.5%], P = .03; in LFP from 31.8% [32.4%] to 14.0% [22.8%], P < .01), the decrease being more pronounced in LFP than in HFP (P < .01). Trait anxiety was significantly higher (P = .01) in the HFP group (median, IQR = 22.5, 9.0) than in the LFP group (median, IQR = 19.0, 3.0). The interference caused more occlusal discomfort in the HFP group than in the LFP group (P = .02) and was associated with a significant increase of masticatory muscle pain (P = .05) and headache (P = .04) only in the HFP group. Conclusion: The application of an experimental occlusal interference has a different effect in individuals reporting a high or low frequency of oral parafunctions.

1. Dawson PE. Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems, ed. 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:434–456.

2. Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Clark GT. An evidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:57–66.

3. Alanen P. Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders (TMD): Still unsolved question? J Dent Res 2002;81: 518–519.

4. Kirveskari P, Le Bell Y, Salonen M, Forssell H. Effect of elimination of occlusal interferences on signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorder in young adults. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:21–26.

5. Kirveskari P, Jamsa T, Alanen P. Occlusal adjustment and the incidence of demand for temporomandibular disorder treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:433–438.

6. Kirveskari P, Jämsä T. Health risk from occlusal interferences in females. Eur J Orthod 2009;1:490–495.

7. Ramfjord SP. Bruxism: A clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:21–44.

8. Forssell H, Kalso E, Koskela P, Vehmanen R, Puukka P, Alanen P. Occlusal treatments in temporomandibular disorders: A qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain 1999;83:549–560.

9. Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of evidence- based medicine to occlusal treatment for temporomandibular disorders: Are there lessons to be learned? J Orofac Pain 2004;18:9–32.

10. Clark GT, Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Watanabe T. Sixty-eight years of experimental occlusal interference studies: What have we learned? J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:704–713.

11. Michelotti A, Farella M, Gallo LM, Veltri A, Palla S, Martina R. Effect of occlusal interference on habitual activity of human masseter. J Dent Res 2005;84:644–648.

12. Le Bell Y, Jamsa T, Korri S, Niemi PM, Alanen P. Effect of artificial occlusal interferences depends on previous experience of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:219–222.

13. Le Bell Y, Niemi PM, Jämsä T, Kylmälä M, Alanen P. Subjective reactions to intervention with artificial interferences in subjects with and without a history of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:59–63.

14. Huang GJ, LeResche L, Critchlow CW, Martin MD, Drangsholt MT. Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD). J Dent Res 2002; 81:284–288.

15. Michelotti A, Cioffi I, Festa P, Scala G, Farella M. Oral parafunctions as risk factors for diagnostic TMD subgroups. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:157–162.

16. Glaros AG, Williams K, Lausten L, Friesen LR. Tooth contact in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 2005;23:188–193.

17. Chen CY, Palla S, Erni S, Sieber M, Gallo LM. Nonfunctional tooth contact in healthy controls and patients with myogenous facial pain. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:185–193.

18. Markiewicz MR, Ohrbach R, McCall WD Jr. Oral behaviors checklist: Reliability of performance in targeted waking-state behaviors. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:306–316.

19. Ohrbach R, Markiewicz MR, McCall WD Jr. Waking- state oral parafunctional behaviors: Specificity and validity as assessed by electromyography. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116:438–444.

20. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

21. Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC. Measuring anxiety, anger, depression, and curiosity as emotional states and personality traits with the STAI, STAIXI, and STPI. In: Hilsenroth MJ, Segal DL (eds). Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004:2:70–86.

22. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008;4:1–32.

23. Bakke M, Møller E. Distortion of maximal elevator activity by unilateral premature tooth contact. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:67–75.

24. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University, 2002:173–201.

25. Eysenck MW, Mogg K, May J, Richards A, Mathews A. Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100:144–150.

26. Ouimet AJ, Gawronski B, Dozois DJ. Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: A review and an integrative model. Clin Psychol Rev 2009;29:459–470.

27. Mogg K, Bradley BP. A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behav Res Ther 1998;36:809–848.

28. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ, Gallagher RM. Somatosensory amplification and affective inhibition are elevated in myo- fascial face pain. Pain Med 2000;1:247–253.

29. Barsky AJ, Goodson JD, Lane RS, Cleary PD. The amplification of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 1988;50: 510–519.

30. Gonçalves DA, Dal Fabbro AL, Campos JA, Bigal ME, Speciali JD. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: An epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain 2010; 24:270–278.

31. Könönen M, Waltimo A, Nyström M. Does clicking in adolescence lead to painful temporomandibular joint locking? Lancet 1996;347:1080–1081.

32. Henrikson T, Nilner M. Temporomandibular disorders and the need for stomatognathic treatment in orthodontically treated and untreated girls. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:283–292.