Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information on Temporomandibular Disorders

Aims: To use a range of evaluation instruments to assess the content and quality of websites about temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and thereby provide guidance regarding the actual accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information of the sites. Methods: Sixty-seven websites resulting from an Internet search with the word "TMD" were evaluated using Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, and Health on the Net (HON) criteria, along with an evaluation method to assess the scientific quality of the website contents. Results were compared according to reviewer, website type, and presence of HON seal. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student t test, chi-square test, and Pearson correlation analysis were used as appropriate. Results: The mean content, HON, and DISCERN scores were 38.9%, below 50%, and 53.9% of the maximum possible score, respectively. Fewer than 50% of the sites displayed the author or reference of the information according to the JAMA benchmarks criteria. Every evaluation criteria showed good agreement among reviewers. Commercial websites were the most common, while sites of nonprofit organizations showed the highest content scores. The overall quality was poor to moderate for all website types. Conclusion: Sites concerning TMD were poorly organized and maintained. Also, most sites contained insufficient or scientifically incorrect information that could have a negative effect on the treatment outcome and prognosis of TMD. Clinicians should guide patients to reputable sources of information that will enhance patient comprehension and better treatment outcomes.

content; evaluation criteria; Internet; quality; TMD

1. Trotter Mi, Morgan DW. Patients’ use of the internet for health related matters: a study of internet usage in 2000 and 2006. Health informatics J 2008;14:175–181.

2. internet World Stats. internet usage statistics: the internet big picture. World internet users and population stats. http:// www.internetworldstats.com. accessed april 20, 2011.

3. Tangri V, chande n. Quality of internet-based information on gastrointestinal diseases. can J Gastroenterol 2011; 25:93–96.

4. Lipp Er. Web resources for patients with prostate cancer: a starting point. Semin Urol Oncol 2002;20:32–38.

5. Starman JS, Gettys fK, capo Ja, fleischli JE, norton HJ, Karunakar Ma. Quality and content of internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg am 2010;92:1612–1618.

6. Zermatten a, Khazaal Y, coquard O, chatton a, Bondolfi

G. Quality of Web-based information on depression. Depress anxiety 2010;27:852–858.

7. Patel U, cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the internet: Quality of online information available to the public. am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e103–e109.

8. ni riordain r, Mccreary c. Head and neck cancer information on the internet: Type, accuracy, and content. Oral Oncol 2009;45:675–677.

9. chestnutt iG. The nature and quality of periodontal related patient information on the world wide web. Br Dent J 2002;193:657–659.

10. López-Jornet P, camacho-alonso f. The quality of patientorientated internet information on oral lichen planus: a pi- lot study. J Eval clin Pract 2010;16:883–886.

11. Scrivani SJ, Keith Da, Kaban LB. Temporomandibular disorders. n Engl J Med 2008;359:2693–2705.

12. Lipton Ja, Ship Ja, Larach-robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J am Dent assoc 1993;124:115–121.

13. fishbain Da, cutler r, rosomoff HL, rosomoff rS. chronic pain-associated depression: antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? a review. clin J Pain 1997;13:116–137.

14. Jerjes W, Upile T, abbas S, et al. Muscle disorders and dentition-related aspects in temporomandibular disorders: controversies in the most commonly used treatment modalities. int arch Med 2008;1:23.

15. Shinchuk LM, chiou P, czarnowski V, Meleger aL. Demo- graphics and attitudes of chronic-pain patients who seek online pain-related medical information: implications for healthcare providers. am J Phys Med rehabil 2010;89: 141–146.

16. Türp Jc, Gerds T, neugebauer S. Temporomandibular disorders: Quality assessment of patient information on the world wide web [in German]. Z arztl fortbild Qualitatssich 2001;95:539–547.

17. crocco aG, Villasis-keever M, Jadad ar. analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JaMa 2002;287:2869–2871.

18. Wilson P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002;324:598–602.

19. charnock D, Shepperd S, need G, Gann r. DiScErn: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol 1999;53:105–111.

20. Winker M, flanagin a, chi-Lum B, White J, andrews K, Kennett r. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet. JaMa 2000;283:1600–1606.

21. Jadad ar, Gagliardi a. rating health information on the internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JaMa 1998;279:611–614.

22. Boyer c, Gaudinat a, Baujard V, Geissbuhler a. Health on the net foundation: assessing the quality of health web pages all over the world. Stud Health Technol inform 2007;129:1017–1021.

23. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio ra. assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet. JaMa 1997;277:1244–1245.

24. Boyer c, Selby M, Scherrer Jr, appel rD. The Health On the net code of conduct for medical and health websites. comput Biol Med 1998;28:603–610.

25. Pérez-López fr, Pérez roncero Gr. assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web. Gynecol Endocrinol 2006;22:669–675.

26. Bin L, Lun K. The retrieval effectiveness of medical information on the web. int J Med informatics 2001;62:155–163.

27. Mujakperuo Hr, Watson M, Morrison r, Macfarlane TV. Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. cochrane Database Syst rev 2010;10:cD004715.

28. ribeiro-rotta rf, Marques KD, Pacheco MJ, Leles cr. Do computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging add to temporomandibular joint disorder treatment? a systematic review of diagnostic efficacy. J Oral rehabil 2011;38:120–135.

29. fricton J, Look JO, Wright E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:237–254.

30. Luther f, Layton S, McDonald f. Orthodontics for treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. cochrane Data- base Syst rev 2010;7:cD006541.

31. List T, axelsson S. Management of TMD: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral rehabil 2010;37:430–451.

32. cairns B, List T, Michelotti a, Ohrbach r, Svensson P. JOr- cOrE recommendations on rehabilitation of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral rehabil 2010;37:481–489.

33. aggarwal Vr, Tickle M, Javidi H, Peters S. reviewing the evidence: can cognitive behavioral therapy improve outcomes for patients with chronic orofacial pain? J Orofac Pain 2010;24:163–171.

34. cairns BE. Pathophysiology of TMD pain—Basic mechanisms and their implications for pharmacotherapy. J Oral rehabil 2010;37:391–410.

35. Escoda-francolí J, Vázquez-Delgado E, Gay-Escoda c. Scientific evidence on the usefulness of intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection in the management of temporomandibular dysfunction. Med Oral Patol Oral cir Bucal 2010;15: e644–e648.

36. Soot Lc, Moneta GL, Edwards JM. Vascular surgery and the internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:84–91.

37. Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg Dr, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg am 2000;82:1540–1543.

38. Page L, Brin S, Motwani r, Winograd T. The Pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. in: Prodeedings of the 7th international World Wide Web conference. Stanford Digital Library Working Paper SiDL-WP-1999-0120. Stanford, ca: Stanford University, 1999.

39. Dupeyron a, ribinik P, Gélis a, et al. Education in the management of low back pain: Literature review and recall of key recommendations for practice. ann Phys rehabil Med 201;54:319–335.

40. Van Oosterwijck J, nijs J, Meeus M, et al. Pain neurophysiology education improves cognitions, pain thresholds, and movement performance in people with chronic whiplash: a pilot study. J rehabil res Dev 2011;48:43–58.

41. Winocur E, Littner D, adams i, Gavish a. Oral habits and their association with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adolescents: a gender comparison. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 2006;102:482–487.

42. Dworkin Sf. Behavioral and educational modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 1997;83:128–133.

43. cleland J, Palmer J. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education on bilateral disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint: a single-case design. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004;34:535–548.

44. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. cyberpsychol Behav 2004;7:497–510.