Lavage Therapy Versus Nonsurgical Therapy for the Treatment of Arthralgia of the Temporomandibular Joint: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Aims: To carry out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate in patients with arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) the effectiveness of TMJ lavage compared to nonsurgical treatment with regard to pain intensity and mandibular range of motion. Methods: The electronic databases Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2012), PubMed÷Medline (1966-2012), and Embase (1966-2012) were systematically searched for relevant RCTs. References of relevant articles were searched for additional studies, as well as citing reports. Two authors independently performed data extraction by using predefined quality indicators. Relevant outcome data included reduction in pain, as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) or a pain score, and maximal mouth opening (MMO) before and 6 months after treatment. Included trials were combined using fixed and random effects meta-analysis. Results: Three RCTs (222 patients) were included for meta-analysis. The statistically significant overall standardized mean difference (SMD) (P < .001) with regard to pain intensity was -1.07 (95% CI = -1.38, - 0.76) in favor of TMJ lavage. The MMO did not change significantly (P > .05, SMD = .05 [95% CI = -0.33, 0.23]). Conclusions: The results suggest that lavage of the TMJ may be slightly more effective than nonsurgical treatment for pain reduction. However, this difference is not likely to be clinically relevant.

arthralgia; arthrocentesis; arthroscopy; meta-analysis; temporomandibular joint

1. Barros Vde M, Seraidarian Pi, côrtes Mi, de Paula LV. The impact of orofacial pain on the quality of life of patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2009; 23:28–37.

2. John MT, reissmann Dr, Schierz O, Wassell rW. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with temporoman dibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:46–54.

3. de Bont LGM, Boering G, Liem rSB, Eulderink f, Westesson PL. Osteoarthritis and internal derangement of the tempo romandibular joint: a light microscopic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:634–643.

4. Stegenga B, de Bont LGM, Dijkstra PU, Boering G. Short-term outcome of arthroscopic surgery of temporoman dibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;31:3–14.

5. de Bont LGM, Stegenga B. Pathology of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis. int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:71–74.

6. Laskin DM. arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. alpha Omegan 2009;102:46–50.

7. Zhang S, Liu X, Yang c, et al. intraarticular adhesions of the temporomandibular joint: relation between arthro- scopic findings and clinical symptoms. BMc Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:70.

8. List T, axelsson S. Management of TMD: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral rehabil 2010;37: 430–451.

9. al-ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray rJ, Sloan P, Glenny aM. Stabilization splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. cochrane Database Syst rev 2004;1: cD002778.

10. Ohnishi M. arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1975;42:207–213.

11. Ohnishi M. clinical application of arthroscopy in the temporomandibular joint diseases. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1980;27:141–150.

12. González-García r, rodríguez-campo fJ, Monje f, román- romero L, Sastre-Pérez J, Usandizaga JL. influence of the upper joint surface and synovial lining in the outcome of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint treated with arthroscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:35–42.

13. nitzan DW. arthrocentesis—incentives for using this mini-mally invasive approach for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg clin north am 2006;18:311–328, vi.

14. al-Belasy fa, Dolwick Mf. arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint closed lock: a review article. int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:773–782.

15. Barkin S, Weinberg S. internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: The role of arthroscopic surgery and arthrocentesis. J can Dent assoc 2000;66:199–203.

16. fridrich KL, Wise JM, Zeitler DL. Prospective comparison of arthroscopy and arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:816–820.

17. Goudot P, Jaquinet ar, Hugonnet S, Haefliger W, richter

M. improvement of pain and function after arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a comparative study. J craniomaxillofac Surg 2000;28:39–43.

18. currie r. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage. Evid Based Dent 2009;10:110.

19. Guo c, Shi Z, revington P. arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders. cochrane Database Syst rev 2009;7:cD004973.

20. Hobeich JB, Salameh Za, ismail E, Sadig WM, Hokayem nE, almas K. arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis. a retro- spective study of disc displacement management without reduction. Saudi Med J 2007;28:1541–1544.

21. White rD. arthroscopic lysis and lavage as the preferred treatment for internal derangements of the temporoman dibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:313–316.

22. rigon M, Pereira LM, Bortoluzzi Mc, Loguercio aD, ramos aL, cardoso Jr. arthroscopy for temporomandibular dis orders. cochrane Database Syst rev 2011;11:cD006385.

23. Diraçog˘ lu D, Saral iB, Keklik B, et al. arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 2009;108:3–8.

24. Schiffman EL, Look JO, Hodges JS, et al. randomized effectiveness study of four therapeutic strategies for TMJ closed lock. J Dent res 2007;86:58–63.

25. Hall HD, indresano aT, Kirk WS, Dietrich MS. Prospective multicenter comparison of 4 temporomandibular joint operations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1174–1179.

26. Kurita H, chen Z, Uehara S, Miyazawa H, nishiura r. com- parison of imaging follow-up between joints with arthro- scopic surgery (lysis and lavage) and those with nonsurgical treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1309–1314.

27. Miyamoto H, Sakashita H, Miyata M, Goss an. arthro- scopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of two successful techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37:397–400.

28. Murakami K, Hosaka H, Moriya Y, Segami n, iizuka T. Short-term treatment outcome study for the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock. a comparison of arthrocentesis to nonsurgical therapy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 1995;80:253–257.

29. Politi M, Sembronio S, robiony M, costa f, Toro c, Undt G. High condylectomy and disc repositioning compared to arthroscopic lysis, lavage, and capsular stretch for the treatment of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 2007;103:27–33.