Article Data

  • Views 280
  • Dowloads 34

Original Research

Open Access

Persistent Dentoalveolar Pain: The Patient’s Experience

  • Justin Durham1,2,*,
  • Catherine Exley1,2
  • Mike T. John3,4
  • Donald R. Nixdorf3,5,6

1Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, Tyne & Wear, England

2Newcastle Univ, Ctr Oral Hlth Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, Tyne & Wear, England

3Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Div TMD & Orofacial Pain, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

4Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

5Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

6HealthPartners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN USA

DOI: 10.11607/jop.1022 Vol.27,Issue 1,March 2013 pp.6-13

Published: 30 March 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Justin Durham E-mail: Justin.Durham@ncl.ac.uk

Abstract

Aims: To build an understanding of the patient's experience and from this identify recurring themes that could form part of an item pool for further testing of persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder (PDAP). Methods: Proven cases of PDAP were identified from a clinical database, and a purposive maximum variation sample was drawn. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the sample by a single trained interviewer. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data collection and analysis occurred until data saturation (n = 20), with no new themes emerging. Analysis of the data was an iterative and inductive process broadly following the principles of the constant comparative method. Results: Recurrent themes emerging from the data were: difficulty in responding to history taking; duration and magnitude of pain; complex and confounding descriptors; common exacerbating factor; well-localized pain; deep pain; pressurized or pressure feeling. Conclusion: Several common experiences that can be considered items were identified in the data. These items will add to the limited pre-existing item pool in the literature and allow testing of this item pool to determine those items best suited to form an adjunctive self-report diagnostic instrument for PDAP.


Keywords

atypical odontalgia; diagnosis; diagnostic instrument; persistent dentoalveolar pain; phantom tooth pain; qualitative


Cite and Share

Justin Durham,Catherine Exley,Mike T. John,Donald R. Nixdorf. Persistent Dentoalveolar Pain: The Patient’s Experience. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2013. 27(1);6-13.

References

1. Nixdorf DR, Drangsholt MT, Ettlin DA, et al. Classifying orofacial pains: A new proposal of taxonomy based on ontology. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:161–169.

2. Baad-Hansen L. Atypical odontalgia—pathophysiology and clinical management. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:1–11.

3. Campbell RL, Parks KW, Dodds RN. Chronic facial pain associated with endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:287–290.

4. Glennon JP, Ng YL, Setchell DJ, Gulabivala K. Prevalence of and factors affecting postpreparation pain in patients undergoing two-visit root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2004; 37:29–37.

5. Graff-Radford SB, Solberg WK. Atypical odontalgia. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:260–265.

6. Harris M. Psychogenic aspects of facial pain. Br Dent J 1974;136:199–202.

7. Lascelles RG. Atypical facial pain and depression. Br J Psychiatr 1966;112:651–659.

8. Marbach JJ. Phantom tooth pain: Differential diagnosis and treatment. J Mass Dent Soc 1996;44:14–18.

9. Oshima K, Ishii T, Ogura Y, Aoyama Y, Katsuumi I. Clinical investigation of patients who develop neuropathic tooth pain after endodontic procedures. J Endod 2009;35: 958–961.

10. Allerbring M, Haegerstam G. Chronic idiopathic orofacial pain. A long-term follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:66–69.

11. Brooke RI, Schnurr RF. Diagnosing and treating atypical odontalgia. J Mass Dent Soc 1995;44:30–32.

12. Israel HA, Ward JD, Horrell B, Scrivani SJ. Oral and maxil-lofacial surgery in patients with chronic orofacial pain. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:662–667.

13. Boureau F, Doubrere JF, Luu M. Study of verbal description in neuropathic pain. Pain 1990;42:145–152.

14. Dubuisson D, Melzack R. Classification of clinical pain descriptions by multiple group discriminant analysis. Exp Neurol 1976;51:480–487.

15. Masson EA, Hunt L, Gem JM, Boulton AJ. A novel approach to the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. Pain 1989;38:25–28.

16. Vickers ER, Cousins MJ, Woodhouse A. Pain description and severity of chronic orofacial pain conditions. Aust Dent J 1998;43:403–409.

17. Bennett MI, Attal N, Backonja MM, et al. Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain. Pain 2007;127:199–203.

18. Pau A, Croucher R, Marcenes W, Leung T. Development and validation of a dental pain-screening questionnaire. Pain 2005;119:75–81.

19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008: chapter 3.

20. Switzer GE, Wisniewski SR, Belle SH, Dew MA, Schultz R. Selecting, developing, and evaluating research instruments. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:399–409.

21. Brooke RI. Atypical odontalgia: A report of twenty-two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;49:196–199.

22. Vickers ER, Cousins MJ, Walker S, Chisholm K. Analysis of 50 patients with atypical odontalgia. A preliminary report on pharmacological procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:24-32.

23. Cresswell JW, Klassen AC, Clark VLP, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2011:6,35. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Available at: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/ methodology/mixed_methods_research/pdf/Best_Practices_ for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2013.

24. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24 (suppl 1):9–160.

25. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

26. Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, et al. Atypical odontalgia: A review of the literature. Headache 2003;43:1060–1074.

27. Woda A, Pionchon P. A unified concept of idiopathic orofacial pain: Clinical features. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:172–184.

28. List T, Leijon G, Svensson P. Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. Pain 2008;139:333–341.

29. Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12:436–445.

30. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage, 2003:xv,336.

31. Rees RT, Harris M. Atypical odontalgia. Br J Oral Surg 1979;16:212–218.

32. De Leeuw R. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2008:316.

33. Marbach J, Raphael KG. Phantom tooth pain: A new look at an old dilemma. Pain Med 2000;1:68–77.

34. Pertes RA, Bailey DR, Milone AS. Atypical odontalgia—A nondental toothache. J NJ Dent Assoc 1995;66:29–33.

35. Melzack R, Torgerson WS. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology 1971;34:50–59.

36. Aggarwal VR, McBeth J, Zakrzewska JM, Macfarlane GJ. Unexplained orofacial pain—Is an early diagnosis possible?Br Dent J 2008;205:E6; discussion 140–141.

37. Hapak L, Gordon A, Locker D, Shandling M, Mock D, Tenenbaum HC. Differentiation between musculoliga-mentous, dentoalveolar, and neurologically based craniofacial pain with a diagnostic questionnaire. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:357–368.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top