Influence of Test Site and Baseline Temperature on Orofacial Thermal Thresholds

Aims: To investigate thermal thresholds of selected orofacial sites, determine if there is a relationship between thermal thresholds at each site, and analyze the influence of two different baseline temperatures on thermal thresholds at the tongue tip.

Methods: Thirty healthy men (mean age, 26 years) participated. Cold detection (CDT), warm detection (WDT), cold pain (CPT), and heat pain (HPT) thresholds were measured bilaterally at five orofacial sites (mentum, lower lip, cheek, forehead, and tongue tip). Relations between thermal thresholds at each test site were assessed. Thermal sensitivity of the tongue tip was compared at two different baseline temperatures (32°C and 36°C). One-way ANOVA, Turkey post-hoc test, paired t test and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analyses.

Results: There was a significant difference for CDT, WDT, and HPT between test sites (ANOVA, P < .001) but no significant difference for CPT (P = .634). Subjects sensitive to cooling were sensitive to warming at the mentum (r = 0.379), tongue tip (r = 0.610), and cheek (r = 0.431) but not at the other test sites. There was a strong negative correlation between CPT and HPT at all test sites. There was no significant difference for CDT and WDT at the baseline temperature of 36°C (paired t test, P = .660), but there was a significant difference at the baseline temperature of 32°C (P < .001). There were no significant differences between CPTs at the two different baseline temperatures (P = .773), while a significant difference existed between HPTs (P = .034).

Conclusion: Thermal thresholds varied between the orofacial test sites, and baseline temperature affected thermal sensitivity of the tongue. Subjects who were relatively sensitive to cold tended to be more sensitive to heat.

baseline temperature; orofacial; quantitative sensory testing; thermal thresholds; trigeminal site

1. Geber c, Klein T, azad S, et al. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German research network on neuropathic Pain (DfnS): a multi-centre study. Pain 2011;152:548–556.

2. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

3. Pigg M, Svensson P, List T. Orofacial thermal thresholds: Time-dependent variability and influence of spatial summation and test site. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:39–48.

4. Becser n, Sand T, Zwart Ja. reliability of cephalic thermal thresholds in healthy subjects. cephalagia 1998;18:574–582.

5. Wasner GL, Brock Ja. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects. clin neurophysiol 2008;119:2389–2395.

6. Green BG, Gelhard B. Perception of temperature of oral and facial skin. Somatosens res 1987;4:191–200.

7. Essick G, Guest S, Martinez E, chen c, McGlone f. Sitedependent and subject-related variations in perioral thermal sensitivity. Somatosens Mot res 2004;21:159–175.

8. Lele PP. relationship between cutaneous thermal thresholds, skin temperature and cross sectional area of the stimulus. J Physiol 1954;126:191–205.

9. Miles TS, nauntofte B, Svensson P. Thermosensation. clinical Oral Physiology. copenhagen: Quintessence, 2004: 72,79,82.

10. www.medoc-web.com [accessed 31 May 2013].

11. Davies Sn, Goldsmith GE, Hellon rf, Mitchell D. facial sensitivity to rates of temperature change: neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence from cats and humans. J Physiol 1983;344:161–175.

12. Lele PP, Weddell G, Williams cM. The relationship between heat transfer, skin temperature and cutaneous sensibility. J Physiol 1954;126:206–234.

13. rolke r, Magerl W, campbell Ka, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006;10:77–88.

14. Stevens JS, choo KK. Temperature sensitivity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot res 1998;15:13–28.

15. rolker,Baronr,Maierc,etal.Quantitativesensorytestingin the Germanresearchnetworkonneuropathic Pain(DfnS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123: 231–243.

16. Matos r, Wang K, Jensen JD, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the trigeminal region: Site and gender differences. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:161–169.

17. Meh D, Denislic M. Quantitative assessment of thermal and pain sensitivity. J neurol Sci 1994;127:164–169.

18. Verdugo r, Ochoa JL. Quantitative somatosensory thermotest: a key method for functional evaluation of small caliber afferent channels. Brain 1992;115:893–913.

19. Hansson P, Lindblom U, Lindström P. Graded assessment and classification of impaired temperature sensibility in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. J neurol neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54:527–530.

20. Schepers rJ, ringkamp M. Thermoreceptors and thermosensitive afferents. neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2010;34:177–184.

21. fruhstorfer H, Lindblom U, Schmidt Wc. Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients. J neurol neurosurg Psychiatry 1976;39:1071–1075.

22. claus D, Hilz MJ, Hummer i, neundörfer B. Methods of measurementofthermalthresholds.actaneurol Scand 1987; 76:288–296.

23. Green BG. Thermal perception on lingual and labial skin. Perception & Psychophysics 1984;36:209–220.

24. Edwards rr, Sarlani E, Wesselmann U, fillingim rB. Quantitative assessment of experimental pain perception: Multiple domains of clinical relevance. Pain 2005;114:315–319.

25. campero M, Serra J, Bostock H, Ochoa JL. Slowly conducting afferents activated by innocuous low temperature in human skin. J Physiol 2001;535:855–865.