Article Data

  • Views 330
  • Dowloads 45

Original Research

Open Access

Chairside Intraoral Qualitative Somatosensory Testing: Reliability and Comparison Between Patients with Atypical Odontalgia and Healthy Controls

  • Lene Baad-Hansen1,*,
  • Maria Pigg2
  • Susanne Elmasry Ivanovic3
  • Hanan Faris4
  • Thomas List3
  • Mark Drangsholt5
  • Peter Svensson4

1Aarhus Univ, Sect Clin Oral Physiol, Dept Dent, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

2Malmo Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden

3Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Stomatognath Physiol, Malmo, Sweden

4Aarhus Univ, Sect Clin Oral Physiol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

5Univ Washington, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA

DOI: 10.11607/jop.1062 Vol.27,Issue 2,June 2013 pp.165-170

Published: 30 June 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Lene Baad-Hansen E-mail: lene.hansen@odontologi.au.dk

Abstract

Aims: To assess intraoral inter- and intraexaminer reliability of three qualitative measures of intraoral somatosensory function and to compare these measures between patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and healthy controls. Methods: Thirty-one AO patients and 47 healthy controls participated. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability was tested on a subgroup of 46 subjects (25 AO; 21 healthy). Sensitivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli was evaluated on the painful gingival site and the corresponding contralateral site in AO patients, and bilaterally on the gingiva of the first maxillary premolars in controls. Patients were asked to report hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, or normal sensitivity to stimuli on the painful site compared with the nonpainful site. Kappa values were calculated, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare frequencies between groups. Results: Kappa values ranged between 0.63 and 0.75. The frequency of hypersensitivity to either modality was significantly higher in patients (29% to 61%) than in controls (9% to 17%) (P < .015), whereas reports of hyposensitivity were similar between groups (2% to 16%) (P > .057). Only 3.2% of the AO patients had no reports of abnormal sensitivity on any of the tests, compared with 59.6% of the healthy subjects (P < .001). Conclusion: Intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing can detect intraoral sensory disturbances in AO patients, and the reliability is sufficient for initial screening of orofacial somatosensory function.


Keywords

atypical odontalgia; intraoral; neuropathic pain; reliability; somatosensory testing


Cite and Share

Lene Baad-Hansen,Maria Pigg,Susanne Elmasry Ivanovic,Hanan Faris,Thomas List,Mark Drangsholt,Peter Svensson. Chairside Intraoral Qualitative Somatosensory Testing: Reliability and Comparison Between Patients with Atypical Odontalgia and Healthy Controls. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2013. 27(2);165-170.

References

1. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory func-tion in orofacial pain conditions—A taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:366–394.

2. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Thygesen T, Juhl GI, Jensen TS. Overview on tools and methods to assess neuropathic trigeminal pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:332–338.

3. Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: A comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006;10:77–88.

4. Maier C, Baron R, Tolle TR, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes. Pain 2010;150: 439–450.

5. Pfau DB, Rolke R, Nickel R, Treede RD, Daublaender M. Somatosensory profiles in subgroups of patients with myogenic temporomandibular disorders and fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2009;147:72–83.

6. List T, Leijon G, Svensson P. Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. Pain 2008; 139:333–341.

7. Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve: Etiology, signs and symptoms, and observations on recovery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:704–709.

8. Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, et al. Atypical odontalgia: A review of the literature. Headache 2003;43:1060–1074.

9. Baad-Hansen L. Atypical odontalgia—Pathophysiology and clinical management. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:1–11.

10. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Svensson P. Effect of local anesthesia on atypical odontalgia—A randomized controlled trial. Pain 2006;122:306–314.

11. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Increased pain sensitivity to intraoral capsaicin in patients with atypi-cal odontalgia. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:107–114.

12. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Kaube H, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia and matched healthy controls. Exp Brain Res 2006;172: 498–506.

13. Nixdorf DR, Drangsholt MT, Ettlin DA, et al. Classifying orofacial pains: A new proposal of taxonomy based on ontology. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:161–169.

14. Benoliel R, Zadik Y, Eliav E, Sharav Y. Peripheral painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: Clinical features in 91 cases and proposal of novel diagnostic criteria. J Orofac Pain 2012;26:49–58.

15. Woda A, Pionchon P. A unified concept of idiopathic orofacial pain: Clinical features. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:172–184.

16. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992; 6:301–355.

17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.

18. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

19. Baad-Hansen L, Leijon G, Svensson P, List T. Comparison of clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:7–14.

20. Baad-Hansen L, Juhl GI, Jensen TS, Brandsborg B, Svensson P. Differential effect of intravenous S-ketamine and fentanyl on atypical odontalgia and capsaicin-evoked pain. Pain 2007;129:46–54.

21. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, et al. Neuropathic pain. Redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology 2008;70:1630–1635.

22. Zagury JG, Eliav E, Heir GM, et al. Prolonged gingival cold allodynia: A novel finding in patients with atypical odontalgia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:312–319.

23. Jääskeläinen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Forssell H. Neuro-physiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain. Pain 2005;117:349–357.

24. Pigg M. Chronic intraoral pain—Assessment of diagnostic methods and prognosis. Swed Dent J Suppl 2011;220:7–91.

25. Pigg M, List T, Petersson K, Lindh C, Petersson A. Diagnostic yield of conventional radiographic and cone-beam computed tomographic images in patients with atypical odontalgia. Int Endod J 2011;44:1092–1101.

26. Jääskeläinen SK. The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:355–359.

27. Jääskeläinen SK. Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:85–107.

28. Jääskeläinen SK, Forssell H, Tenovuo O. Electrophysiological testing of the trigeminofacial system: Aid in the diagnosis of atypical facial pain. Pain 1999;80:191–200.



Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top