Article Data

  • Views 300
  • Dowloads 39

Original Research

Open Access

Neuroplasticity in the Adaptation to Prosthodontic Treatment

  • Julien Luraschi1,2,*,
  • Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar3,4
  • Terry Whittle2
  • Martin Schimmel1
  • Frauke Müller1
  • Iven Klineberg2

1Univ Geneva, Div Gerodontol & Removable Prosthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland

2Univ Sydney, Jaw Funct & Orofacial Pain Res Unit, Fac Dent, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

3Univ Sydney, Brain Dynam Ctr, Med Sch Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

4Westmead Millennium Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia

DOI: 10.11607/jop.1097 Vol.27,Issue 3,September 2013 pp.206-216

Published: 30 September 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Julien Luraschi E-mail: julien.luraschi@unige.ch

Abstract

Aims: To investigate cerebral cortical changes by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) after denture renewal and to test how these relate to prosthodontic treatment adaptability as measured by chewing efficiency and maximum bite force. Methods: Ten complete denture wearers (five women and five men, mean age ± standard deviation: 70.3 ± 9.1 years) participated in the study. Each had their complete dentures renewed and underwent an fMRI examination with three functional tasks (lip pursing; jaw tapping; jaw clenching) as well as a color-mixing test for chewing efficiency and unilateral maximum bite force measurements. Recordings were performed with the old dentures (T0) and with the new dentures on insertion (T1) and at 1 week (T2) and 3 months postinsertion (T3). At T1, denture stability and retention (S/T) were assessed by two independent operators. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Spearman's rho correlation were carried out for data analysis. Results: The right and the left precentral gyrus (PRCG) and postcentral gyrus (POCG) were identified with significant activation across all three functional tasks. A statistically significant increase in the level of activity between T0 and T2 (POCG: P = .022; PRCG: P = .017) was found during jaw clenching tasks. Both regions of interest (PRCG, POCG) appeared to correlate with S/T of the new dentures while the subject performed a lip-pursing task (PRCG: r = 0.689, P = .027; POCG: r = 0.665, P = .036). The chewing efficiency and maximum bite force increased significantly during the adaptation to replacement dentures (chewing efficiency: T1-T2 P = .032, T2-T3 P = .012; maximum bite force right side: T2-T3 P = .047). Conclusion: Changes in brain activity occurred in the adaptation to replacement dentures and appeared to regain preinsertion activity levels during motor tasks involving the dental occlusion after 3 months postinsertion.


Keywords

bite force; chewing efficiency; complete denture; fMRI; neuroplasticity


Cite and Share

Julien Luraschi,Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar,Terry Whittle,Martin Schimmel,Frauke Müller,Iven Klineberg. Neuroplasticity in the Adaptation to Prosthodontic Treatment. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2013. 27(3);206-216.

References

1. Berry Dc, Mahood M. Oral stereognosis and oral ability in relation to prosthetic treatment. Br Dent J 1966;120:179–185.

2. ikebe K, amemiya M, Morii K, Matsuda K, furuya-Yoshinaka M, Yoshinaka M. association between oral stereognostic ability and masticatory performance in aged complete denture wearers. int J Prosthodont 2007;20:245–250.

3. Jacobs r, Bou Serhal c, van Steenberghe D. The stereognostic ability of natural dentitions versus implant-supported fixed prostheses or overdentures. clin Oral investig 1997; 1:89–94.

4. Jacobs r, Bou Serhal c, van Steenberghe D. Oral stereognosis: a review of the literature. clin Oral investig 1998;2:3–10.

5. Jang KS, Kim YS. comparison of oral sensory function in complete denture and implant-supported prosthesis wearers. J Oral rehabil 2001;28:220–225.

6. Lundqvist S. Speech and other oral functions. clinical and experimental studies with special reference to maxillary rehabilitation on osseointegrated implants. Swed Dent J Suppl 1993;91:1–39.

7. Mantecchini G, Bassi f, Pera P, Preti G. Oral stereognosis in edentulous subjects rehabilitated with complete removable dentures. J Oral rehabil 1998;25:185–189.

8. Müller f, Link i, fuhr K, Utz KH. Studies on adaptation to complete dentures. Part ii: Oral stereognosis and tactile sensibility. J Oral rehabil 1995;22:759–767.

9. Müller f, Hasse Sander i, Hupfauf L. Studies on adaptation to complete dentures. 1. Oral and manual motor ability. J Oral rehabil 1995;22:501–507.

10. Muller f, Heath Mr, Ott r. Maximum bite force after the replacement of complete dentures. Gerodontology 2001;18:58–62.

11. Yan c, Ye L, Zhen J, Ke L, Gang L. neuroplasticity of edentulous patients with implant-supported full dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:387–393.

12. Kimoto K, Ono Y, Tachibana a, Hirano Y, Otsuka T, Ohno

a. chewing-induced regional brain activity in edentulous patients who received mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a preliminary report. J Prosthodont res 2011;55: 89–97.


13. fontijn-Tekamp fa, Slagter aP, Van Der Bilt a, Van ‘T Hof Ma, Witter DJ, Kalk W. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent res 2000;79:1519–1524.

14. Piancino MG, farina D, Talpone f, castroflorio T, Gassino G, Margarino V. Surface EMG of jaw-elevator muscles and chewing pattern in complete denture wearers. J Oral rehabil 2005;32:863–870.

15. raustia aM, Salonen Ma, Pyhtinen J. Evaluation of masticatory muscles of edentulous patients by computed tomography and electromyography. J Oral rehabil 1996;23:11–16.

16. Mericske-Stern r, Hofmann J, Wedig a, Geering a. in vivo measurements of maximal occlusal force and minimal pressure threshold on overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: a comparative study, Part 1. int J Oral Maxil- lofac implants 1993;8:641–649.

17. avivi-arber L, Martin r, Lee Jc, Sessle BJ. face sensorimotor cortex and its neuroplasticity related to orofacial sensorimotor functions. arch Oral Biol 2011;56:1440–1465.

18. Sessle BJ. Mechanisms of oral somatosensory and motor functions and their clinical correlates. J Oral rehabil 2006; 33:243–261.

19. Kato c, fujita K, Kokai S, ishida T, Shibata M, naito S. increased occlusal vertical dimension induces cortical plasticity in the rat face primary motor cortex. Behav Brain res 2012; 228:254–260.

20. Miles TS. reorganization of the human motor cortex by sensory signals: a selective review. clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2005;32:128–131.

21. Müller f, Heath Mr, Davis G. immediate oral function after the insertion of replacement dentures. J Dent res 1998; 77:697.

22. Müller f, Heath Mr, ferman aM, Davis Gr. Modulation of mastication during experimental loosening of complete dentures. int J Prosthodont 2002;15:553–558.

23. Tamura T, Kanayama T, Yoshida S, Kawasaki T. analysis of brain activity during clenching by fMri. J Oral rehabil 2002;29:467–472.

24. Tamura T, Kanayama T, Yoshida S, Kawasaki T. functional magnetic resonance imaging of human jaw movements. J Oral rehabil 2003;30:614–622.

25. Ohkubo c, Morokuma M, Yoneyama Y, Matsuda r, Lee JS. interactions between occlusion and human brain function activities. J Oral rehabil 2013;40:119–129.

26. Ono Y, Yamamoto T, Kubo KY, Onozuka M. Occlusion and brain function: Mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction. J Oral rehabil 2010;37:624–640.

27. Onozuka M, fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, niwa M, nishiyama K. age-related changes in brain regional activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent res 2003;82:657–660.

28. Klineberg i, Murray GM. Osseoperception: Sensory function and proprioception. adv Dent res 1999;13:120–129.

29. Soltysik Da, Hyde JS. Strategies for block-design fMri experiments during task-related motion of structures of the oral cavity. neuroimage 2006;29:1260–1271.

30. folstein Mf, folstein SE, McHugh Pr.“Mini-mental state”. a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr res 1975;12:189–198.

31. Sheikh Ji, Yesavange Ja. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). recent evidence and development of a shorter version. in: Bring T (ed). clinical Gerontology: a Guide to assessment and interventions. new York: Haworth Press, 1986:165–173.

32. Schimmel M, christou P, Herrmann f, Muller f. a two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: Development of different assessment methods. J Oral rehabil 2007; 34:671–678.

33. Schimmel M, Leemann B, Herrmann fr, Kiliaridis S, Schnider a, Muller f. Masticatory function and bite force in stroke patients. J Dent res 2011;90:230–234.

34. van der Bilt a. assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. J Oral rehabil 2011; 38:754–780.

35. Keiko T, Suguri Y, Miyata Y. Masticatory function of students at a women’s college: The relationship between masticatory function, physical conditions, and physical strength [in Japanese]. Seikatsu Keieigaku, Jidogaku, Shokuhin, Eiyogakuhen 2002;26:63–68.

36. Khan aa, Mccreary B, Owatz cB, Schindler WG, Schwartz Sa, Keiser K. The development of a diagnostic instrument for the measurement of mechanical allodynia. J Endod 2007;33:663–666.

37. Kapur KK. a clinical evaluation of denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18:550–558.

38. ashbuner J, friston KJ. Unified segmentation. neuroimage 2005;26:839–851.

39. Talairach J, Tournoux P. co-planar Stereotaxic atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System—an approach to cerebral imaging. new York: Thieme, 1988.

40. narita n, Kamiya K, Yamamura K, Kawasaki S, Matsumoto T, Tanaka n. chewing-related prefrontal cortex activation while wearing partial denture prosthesis: Pilot study. J Prosthodont res 2009;53:126–135.

41. Preti G, Gassino G, Lombardi M, Mazzone P. Monitoring of the discrimination threshold for interocclusal thicknesses in rehabilitated edentulous patients. J Oral rehabil 1994;21:185–190.

42. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral rehabil 1979;6:41–48.

43. Ellis JS, Pelekis nD, Thomason JM. conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: The impact on oral health- related quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Prosthodont 2007;16:37–42.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top