Article Data

  • Views 326
  • Dowloads 54

Original Research

Open Access

Epidemiology of Severity of Temporomandibular Disorders in Brazilian Women

  • Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos1,*,
  • Andréa Corrêa Carrascosa2
  • Fernanda Salloume Sampaio Bonafé3
  • João Maroco4,5

1Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista—UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil

2Department of Food and Nutrition, Univ Estadual Paulista—UNESP, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Araraquara, Araraquara, Brazil

3Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista—UNESP Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil

4Department of Psychological Sciences, ISPA–Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal

5Psychology and Health Research Unit, ISPA–Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1194 Vol.28,Issue 2,June 2014 pp.147-152

Published: 30 June 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos E-mail: jucampos@foar.unesp.br

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the severity of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) of women in the municipality of Araraquara (Brazil) as well as the contribution of the perception of oral health, mandibular functional limitation, and sociodemographic variables on the severity of TMD. Methods: The participants were interviewed by telephone. Information regarding age, marital status, economic level, education, and use and type of dental prostheses was surveyed. To evaluate TMD severity, mandibular functional limitation and perception of oral health, Fonseca’s Anamnesic Index (IAF), the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) were used. To evaluate the contribution of these variables on TMD severity, a structural equation model (SEM) was fitted to the data and assessed by usual goodness-of-fit indices. Results: A total of 701 women with a mean age of 44.36 years (SD = 16.31) participated. According to the IAF, 59.6% (95% confidence interval = 56.0%–63.2%) of the women were classified as having TMD, of which 63.9% presented light, 26.8% moderate, and 9.3% severe TMD. Mandibular functional limitation was low in 91.0% of the women, moderate in 7.1%, and severe in 1.9%. Goodness-of-fit for the structural model was adequate. The predictors explained 43% of the variation in the TMD severity, with significant contributions of the variables dental prostheses (β = –.008; P = .006), perception of oral health (β = –.43; P < .001), and mandibular functional limitation (β = .014; P = 014). Conclusion: The severity of TMD among Brazilian women was greater in non-users of dental prostheses and was also associated with greater mandibular functional limitation and poor perception of oral health.

Keywords

oral health; scales; structural equation modeling; temporomandibular disorders (TMD); women

Cite and Share

Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos,Andréa Corrêa Carrascosa,Fernanda Salloume Sampaio Bonafé,João Maroco. Epidemiology of Severity of Temporomandibular Disorders in Brazilian Women. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014. 28(2);147-152.

References

1. De Leeuw R (ed). Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management, ed 5. American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Chicago: Quintessence; 2013:129–130.

2. Oliveira AS, Dias EM, Contato RG, Bérzin F. Prevalence study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in Brazilian college students. Braz Oral Res 2006;20:3–7.

3. LeResche L, Saunders K, Von Korff MR, Barlow W, Dworkin SF. Use of exogenous hormones and risk of temporomandibular disorder pain. Pain 1997;69:153–160.

4. LeResche L, Mancl L, Sherman JJ, Gandara B, Dworkin SF. Changes in temporomandibular pain and other symptoms across the menstrual cycle. Pain 2003;106:253–261.

5. Gonçalves DA, Dal Fabbro AL, Campos JA, Bigal ME, Speciali JG. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: An epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:270–278.

6. Licini F, Nojelli A, Segu M, Collesano V. Role of psychosocial factors in etiology of temporomandibular disorders: Relevance of a biaxial diagnosis. Minerva Stomatol 2009;58:557–566.

7. Yap AU, Chua EK, Dworkin SF, Tan HH, Tan KB. Multiple pains and psychosocial functioning/psychologic distress in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:461–466.

8. Yap AU, Chua EK, Tan KB, Chan YH. Relationships between depression/somatization and self-reports of pain and disability. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:220–225.

9. Martins RJ, Garcia AR, Garbin CAS, Sundefeld MLMM. Associação entre classe econômica e stresse na ocorrência da disfunção temporomandibular. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2007;10:215–222.

10. Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. Reliability of the craniomandibular índex. J Orofac Pain 1986;65:1359–1364.

11. Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. The craniomandibular índex: Validity. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:222–228.

12. Stegenga B, Bont LG, Leeuw R, Boering G. Assessment of mandibular function impairment associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:183–195.

13. Da Fonseca DM, Bonfante G, Valle AL, De Freitas SFT. Diagnóstico pela anamnese da disfunção craniomandibular. RGO-Rev Gaúcha Odontol 1994;4:23–32.

14. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;4: 301–355.

15. De Laat A, Stappaerts K, Papy S. Counseling and physical therapy as treatment for myofascial pain of the masticatory system. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:42–49.

16. Nomura K, Vitti M, Oliveira AS, Chaves TC, Semprini M, Siéssere S, et al. Use of the Fonseca's Questionnaire to assess the prevalence and severity of temporomandibular dis-orders in Brasilian dental undergraduates. Braz Dent J 2007; 18:163–167.

17. Pereira LJ, Steenks MH, Wiler AD, Speksnijder CM, Van Der Bilt A. Masticatory function in subacute TMD patients before and after treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:391–402.

18. Ferreira AD, Cesar CC, Malta DC, Andrade AC, Ramos CG, Proietti FA. Validity of data collected by telephone survey: A comparison of VIGITEL 2008 and 'Saude em Beaga' survey. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2011;14(suppl 1):16–30.

19. ABEP. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. 2008 [07 março 2008]. Available at: http://www.abep.org/new/criterioBrasil. aspx. [Accessed 4 April, 2014.]

20. Atchinson KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ 1990;54:680–687.

21. Campos JADB, Carrascosa AC, Bonafé FSS, Maroco J. Severity of temporomandibular disorders in woman: Reliability and validity of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. Braz Oral Res 2014;28:16–21.

22. Campos JADB, Carrascosa AC, Maroco J. Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:377–383.

23. Pinto VG. Saúde bucal coletiva, ed 4. São Paulo: Santos,2000.

24. Maroco J. Análise de equações estruturais. Lisboa: Report Number, 2010.

25. Conti PCR, Ferreira PM, Pegoraro LF, Conti JV, Salvador MCG. A crosssectional study of prevalence and etiology of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in high school and university students. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:254–262.

26. Poveda Roda R, Bagán JV, Diaz Fernández JM, Hernandez Bazán S, Jiménez Soriano Y. Review of temporomandibular jointpathology. Part I: Classification, epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E292–E298.

27. Mobilio N, Casetta I, Cesnik E, Catapano S. Prevalence of self-reported symptoms related to temporomandibular disorders in an Italian population. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:884–890.

28. Glass EG, McGlynn FD, Glaros AG, Melton K, Romans K. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders symptoms in a major metropolitan area. J Craniomand Pract 1993;11:217–220.

29. Gourlet JP, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP. Jaw pain prevalence among French speaking Canadians in Quebec and related symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1995;74: 1738–1744.

30. Campos JADB, Gonçalves DAG, Camparis CM, Specialli JG. Reliability of a questionnaire for diagnosing the severity of temporomandibular disorder. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009;1:38–43.

31. Gremillion HA. The relationship between occlusion and TMD: An evidence-based discussion. J Evid Base Dent Pract 2006;6:43–47.

32. Maixner W, Diatchenko L, Dubner R, et al. Orofacial pain pro-spective evaluation and risk assessment study—the OPPERA study. J Pain 2011;12(11 suppl):T4–T11.

33. Silva SRC, Rosell FL, Valsecki Júnior A. Percepção das condições de saúde bucal por gestantes atendidas em uma unidade de saúde no município de Araraquara, São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant 2006;6:405–410.

34. Liu F, Steinkeler A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am 2013;57:465–479.

35. Sugisaki M, Kino K, Yoshida N, Ishikawa T, Amagasa T, Haketa T. Development of a new questionnaire to assess pain-related limitations of daily functions in Japanese patients with temporoman-dibular disorders. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33: 384–395.

36. Tjakkes GH, Reinders JJ, Tenvergert EM, Stegenga B. TMD pain: The effect on health related quality of life and the influence of pain duration. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:46.

37. Carrascosa AC, Campos JADB, Faria JB. Disfunções tem-poromandibulares, alimentação e nutrição: Revisão da literatu-ra. Alim Nutri Araraquara 2008;19:499–504.

38. Shiau YY, Peng CC, Wen SC, Lin LD, Wang JS, Lou KL. The effects of masseter muscle pain on biting performance. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:978–984.

39. Mallek H, Neff P, Nakamoto T. Interactions of nutrition and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Ear Nose Throat J 1984; 63:499–504.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top