Article Data

  • Views 468
  • Dowloads 58

Original Research

Open Access

Effectiveness of a Prefabricated Occlusal Appliance in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Pain: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study

  • Nikolaos Christidis1,*,
  • Marika Doepel2
  • EwaCarin Ekberg3
  • Malin Ernberg1
  • Yrsa Le Bell4
  • Maria Nilner3

1Section of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

2Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

3Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

4Graduate Program in Clinical Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

5,

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1216 Vol.28,Issue 2,June 2014 pp.128-137

Published: 30 June 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Nikolaos Christidis E-mail: Nikolaos.christidis@ki.se

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of a prefabricated appliance and compare it to the effectiveness of a stabilization appliance in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. Methods: This randomized, controlled multicenter study comprised 48 patients diagnosed with TMJ arthralgia according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The effectiveness of a prefabricated appliance (Relax), worn by half of the patients (referred to as the R group), was compared to the effectiveness of a stabilization appliance, worn by the other half of patients (S group). Treatment outcome was assessed according to the recommendations by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) on an intent-to-treat basis. To analyze the differences between groups, the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used, while the Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks was used for the analyses between baseline data and follow-up measurements, all with a significance level set at P < .05. Results: There were no differences between the groups at baseline. A 30% reduction of pain intensity was reported by 62.5% of the R group and 58.3% of the S group at the 10-week follow-up; 58% and 50.3%, respectively, at the 6-month follow-up; and 41.7% in both groups at 12 months. At the 12-month follow-up, pain intensity had decreased and physical function had improved in both groups (P < .005 and P < .016, respectively), without significant group differences. Emotional function (depression and nonspecific physical symptoms) did not change. Overall improvement of “better” to “symptom-free” was observed in 67% of the R group and 58% of the S group. No side effects occurred. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the prefabricated appliance seems to be similar to that of the stabilization appliance in alleviating TMJ pain. Since the prefabricated appliance requires only one visit for construction, it is convenient for both the general practitioner and for the patient.

Keywords

arthralgia; headache; long-term follow-up; occlusal appliance; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Nikolaos Christidis,Marika Doepel,EwaCarin Ekberg,Malin Ernberg,Yrsa Le Bell,Maria Nilner. Effectiveness of a Prefabricated Occlusal Appliance in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Pain: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014. 28(2);128-137.

References

1. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:638.

2. Brattberg G, Thorslund M, Wikman A. The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden. Pain 1989;37:215–222.

3. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: Clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120:273–281.

4. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291–305.

5. John MT, Dworkin SF, Mancl LA. Reliability of clinical temporo-mandibular disorder diagnoses. Pain 2005;118:61–69.

6. Dao TT, LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:169–184; discussion 184–195.

7. Unell L, Johansson A, Carlsson GE, Halling A, Soderfeldt B. Changes in reported orofacial symptoms over a ten-year period as reflected in two cohorts of fifty-year-old subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:202–208.

8. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Burning mouth syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors. J Oral Pathol Med 1999;28:350–354.

9. Muzyka BC, De Rossi SS. A review of burning mouth syndrome. Cutis 1999;64:29–35.

10. Kitt CA, Gruber K, Davis M, Woolf CJ, Levine JD. Trigeminal neuralgia: Opportunities for research and treatment. Pain 2000;85:3–7.

11. Manzoni GC, Torelli P. Epidemiology of typical and atypical craniofacial neuralgias. Neurol Sci 2005;26(suppl 2):s65–s67.

12. Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds). Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994.

13. Kelley P, Clifford P. Coping with chronic pain: Assessing narrative approaches. Soc Work 1997;42:266–277.

14. Thomas SP. A phenomenologic study of chronic pain. West J Nurs Res 2000;22:683–699; discussion 699–705.

15. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

16. Yokoyama T, Lisi TL, Moore SA, Sluka KA. Muscle fatigue increases the probability of developing hyperalgesia in mice. J Pain 2007;8:692–699.

17. Hallberg LR, Carlsson SG. Coping with fibromyalgia. A qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 2000;14:29–36.

18. Ohman M, Soderberg S, Lundman B. Hovering between suffering and enduring: The meaning of living with serious chronic illness. Qual Health Res 2003;13:528–542.

19. Barros Vde M, Seraidarian PI, Cortes MI, de Paula LV. The impact of orofacial pain on the quality of life of patients with temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:28–37.

20. Goncalves DA, Dal Fabbro AL, Campos JA, Bigal ME, Speciali JG. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: An epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain 2010; 24:270–278.

21. Manfredini D, Piccotti F, Ferronato G, Guarda-Nardini L. Age peaks of different RDC/TMD diagnoses in a patient population. J Dent 2010;38:392–399.

22. John MT, Reißmann DR, Schierz O, Wassell RW. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:46–54.

23. Winocur E, Steinkeller-Dekel M, Reiter S, Eli I. A retrospective analysis of temporomandibular findings among Israeliborn patients based on the RDC/TMD. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:11–17.

24. Kreiner M, Betancor E, Clark GT. Occlusal stabilization appliances. Evidence of their efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:770–777.

25. Fricton J, Look JO, Wright E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:237–254.

26. List T, Axelsson S. Management of TMD: Evidence from sys-tematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:430–451.

27. Conti PC, de Alencar EN, da Mota Correa AS, Lauris JR, Porporatti AL, Costa YM. Behavioural changes and occlusal splints are effective in the management of masticatory myofascial pain: A short-term evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:754–760.

28. Godwin M, Ruhland L, Casson I, et al. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: The struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:28.

29. Nilner M, Ekberg EC, Doepel M, Andersson J, Selovuo K, Le Bell Y. Short-term effectiveness of a prefabricated occlusal appliance in patients with myofascial pain. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:209–218.

30. Doepel M, Nilner M, Ekberg EC, LE Bell Y. Long-term effectiveness of a prefabricated oral appliance for myofascial pain. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:452–460.

31. Doepel M, Nilner M, Ekberg EC, Vahlberg T, LE Bell Y. Headache: Short- and long-term effectiveness of a prefabricated appliance compared to a stabilization appliance. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:129–136.

32. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

33. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19.

34. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008;9:105–121.

35. Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients [see comments]. Pain 1993;55:195–203.

36. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94:149–158.

37. Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: Development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:219–230.

38. Ekberg EC, Vallon D, Nilner M. Occlusal appliance therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A double-blind controlled study in a short-term perspective. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:122–128.

39. Ekberg EC, Nilner M. A 6- and 12-month follow-up of appliance therapy in TMD patients: A follow-up of a controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:564–570.

40. Dahlstrom L, Haraldson T. Bite plates and stabilization splints in mandibular dysfunction. A clinical and electromyographic comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43:109–114.

41. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE, Dahlstrom L, Jansson T. Relationship between myoelectric activity in masticatory muscles and bite force. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:539–545.

42. Siegert R, Gundlach KK. Stabilizing splint versus relaxing appliances in the treatment of myofacial pain. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1989;44(special issue):S17–S19.

43. Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gotzsche PC, et al. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:781–788.

44. Jokstad A, Mo A, Krogstad BS. Clinical comparison between two different splint designs for temporomandibular disorder therapy. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:218–226.

45. Magnusson T, Adiels AM, Nilsson HL, Helkimo M. Treatment effect on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders—Comparison between stabilisation splint and a new type of splint (NTI). A pilot study. Swed Dent J 2004;28:11–20.

46. Truelove E, Huggins KH, Mancl L, Dworkin SF. The efficacy of traditional, low-cost and nonsplint therapies for temporo-mandibular disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1099–107; quiz 1169.

47. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for tem-poromandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:259–276.

48. Nilsson H, Vallon D, Ekberg EC. Long-term efficacy of resilient appliance therapy in TMD pain patients: A randomised, controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:713–721.

49. Ekberg EC, Nilner M. Treatment outcome of short- and long-term appliance therapy in patients with TMD of myogenous origin and tension-type headache. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33: 713–721.

50. Ekberg EC, Nilner M. Treatment outcome of appliance therapy in temporomandibular disorder patients with myofascial pain after 6 and 12 months. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:343–349.

51. Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Nissman D, Lohr KN, Carey TS. Criteria for Distinguishing Effectiveness from Efficacy Trials in Systematic Reviews. Technical Review 12. (Prepared by the RTI-International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-0046. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top