A Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiographic Examinations of Patients with Atypical Odontalgia

Aims: To examine (1) the occurrence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal changes in the painful regions of patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and (2) the correlation of such findings to periapical bone defects detected with a comprehensive radiographic examination including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A total of 20 patients (mean age 52 years, range 34 to 65) diagnosed with AO participated. Mean pain intensity (± standard deviation) was 5.6 ± 1.8 on a 0–10 numerical rating scale, and mean pain duration was 4.3 ± 5.2 years. The inclusion criterion was chronic pain (> 6 months) located in a region with no clear pathologic cause identified clinically or in periapical radiographs. In addition to a clinical examination and a self-report questionnaire, the assessments included radiographic examinations (panoramic, periapical, and CBCT images), and an MRI examination. Changes in MRI signal in the painful region were recorded. Spearman’s rank correlation between radiographic and MRI findings was calculated. Results: Eight of the patients (40%) had MRI signal changes in the pain region. The correlation to radiographic periapical radiolucencies was 0.526 (P = .003). Of the eight teeth displaying changes in MRI signal, six showed periapical radiolucency in the radiographs. Conclusion: MRI examination revealed no changes in the painful region in a majority of patients with AO, suggesting that inflammation was not present. MRI findings were significantly correlated to radiographic findings.

cone beam computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; orofacial pain; persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder; trigeminal pain

1. Nixdorf DR, Drangsholt MT, Ettlin DA, et al. Classifying orofacial pains: A new proposal of taxonomy based on ontology. J Oral Rehabil 2011;39:161–169.

2. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, ed 2. Cephalagia 2004;24:9–160.

3. Woda A, Tubert-Jeannin S, Bouhassira D, et al. Towards a new taxonomy of idiopathic orofacial pain. Pain 2005;116:396–406.

4. Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, et al. Atypical odontalgia: A review of the literature. Headache 2003;43:1060–1074.

5. Marbach JJ. Is phantom tooth pain a deafferentation (neuropathic) syndrome? Part I: Evidence derived from pathophysiology and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:95–105.

6. Baad-Hansen L. Atypical odontalgia—Pathophysiology and clinical management. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:1–11.

7. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Dworkin SF, Svensson P. Clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:89–98.

8. Nixdorf DR, Moana-Filho EJ, Law AS, McGuire LA, Hodges JS, John MT. Frequency of nonodontogenic pain after endodontic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36:1494–1498.

9. Remick RA, Blasberg B, Barton JS, Campos PE, Miles JE. Ineffective dental and surgical treatment associated with atypical facial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:355–358.

10. Mock D, Frydman W, Gordon AS. Atypical facial pain: A retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59: 472–474.

11. Petersson A, Axelsson S, Davidson T, et al. Radiological diagnosis of periapical bone tissue lesions in endodontics: A systematic review. Int Endod J 2012;45:783–801.

12. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114–119.

13. Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after rootend resection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:531–536.

14. Pigg M, List T, Petersson K, Lindh C, Petersson A. Diagnostic yield of conventional radiographic and cone-beam computed tomographic images in patients with atypical odontalgia. Int Endod J 2011;44:1092–1101.

15. Linenberg WB, Waldron CA, Delaune GF,Jr. A clinical, roentgenographic, and histopathologic evaluation of periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:467–472.

16. Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Incomplete healing (scar tissue) after periapical surgery—Radiographic findings 8 to 12 years after treatment. J Endod 1996;22:264–268.

17. Green TL, Walton RE, Taylor JK, Merrell P. Radiographic and histologic periapical findings of root canal treated teeth in cadaver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83: 707–711.

18. Ricucci D, Mannocci F, Ford TR. A study of periapical lesions correlating the presence of a radiopaque lamina with histological findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:389–394.

19. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2010;36:423–428.

20. Tutton LM, Goddard PR. MRI of the teeth. Br J Radiol 2002; 75:552–562.

21. Cotti E, Campisi G. Advanced radiographic techniques for the detection of lesions in bone. Endod Topics 2004;7:52–72.

22. Kress B, Buhl Y, Anders L, et al. Quantitative analysis of MRI signal intensity as a tool for evaluating tooth pulp vitality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:241–244.

23. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: Making the invisible visible. J Endod 2011;37:745–752.

24. Gaudino C, Cosgarea R, Heiland S, et al. MR-Imaging of teeth and periodontal apparatus: An experimental study comparing high-resolution MRI with MDCT and CBCT. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2575–2583.

25. MedicineNet.Inc. www.medterms.com.

26. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for tem-poromandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

27. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.

28. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1991.

29. Larheim TA. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs 2005;180:6–21.

30. Petersson A. What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging—An overview related to the RDC/TMD diagnostic system. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:771–778.

31. Schnurr RF, Brooke RI. Atypical odontalgia. Update and comment on long-term follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:445–448.

32. Graff-Radford SB, Solberg WK. Atypical odontalgia. J Cranio-mandib Disord 1992;6:260–265.

33. Vickers ER, Cousins MJ, Walker S, Chisholm K. Analysis of 50 patients with atypical odontalgia. A preliminary report on pharmacological procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:24–32.

34. List T, Leijon G, Svensson P. Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. Pain 2008;139: 333–341.

35. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing: Reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:165–70.

36. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Svensson P. Effect of local anesthesia on atypical odontalgia—A randomized controlled tri-al. Pain 2006;122:306–314.