Article Data

  • Views 325
  • Dowloads 57

Original Research

Open Access

Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients With or Without Ongoing Pain One Year After Orthognathic Surgery

  • Yi Luo1
  • Peter Svensson2
  • Janek Dalsgaard Jensen3
  • Thomas Jensen3
  • Bjarne Neuman3
  • Lars Arendt-Nielsen1
  • Kelun Wang4,*,

1Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

2Department of Clinical Oral Physiology School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, MindLab, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

4Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1275 Vol.28,Issue 4,December 2014 pp.306-316

Published: 30 December 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Kelun Wang E-mail: kelun@hst.aau.dk

Abstract

Aims: To (1) quantitatively investigate the possible long-term surgical impact of orthognathic surgery on the patients’ trigeminal somatosensory functions and (2) investigate the influence of ongoing pain on the trigeminal somatosensory functions of the patients. Methods: A group of patients before orthognathic surgery (Pre-op), a group of patients 1 year after orthognathic surgery (Post-op), and a group of control participants (Control) were recruited (n = 28 in each group). A standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol was followed to record a battery of 13 parameters, which reflect both sensory loss and gain. The data were analyzed using three-way repeated measure analysis of variance with group and pain as between-subject factors and testing site as within-subject factor. Results: In the Post-op group, of the 21.4% patients who reported ongoing pain after surgery, 7.1% were diagnosed with neuropathic pain and 14.3% had musculoskeletal pain. Facial cold detection threshold (CDT) of the Post-op group was significantly lower (less sensitive) than that of the Pre-op group (P < .039). Facial pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the Post-op group was significantly lower (more sensitive) than that of the Pre-op and Control groups (P < .006). Masseter PPT of the Post-op group was significantly lower than that of the Control group (P = .02). The facial vibration detection threshold (VDT) of the Post-op group was significantly higher (less sensitive) than that of the Pre-op and Control groups (P < .014). Pain patients in the Post-op group showed significantly elevated VDT compared to patients without pain (P < .001). Conclusion: The pattern of sensory alteration in orthognathic surgical patients with or without pain was characterized by sensory loss in thermal parameters and non-nociceptive mechanosensory parameters and sensory gain in nociceptive mechanosensory parameters. The elevated VDT might be a potential indicator of the impact of postoperative pain on trigeminal somatosensory functions.

Keywords

musculoskeletal pain; neuropathic pain; orofacial pain; orthognathic surgery; quantitative sensory testing; somatosensory function

Cite and Share

Yi Luo,Peter Svensson,Janek Dalsgaard Jensen,Thomas Jensen,Bjarne Neuman,Lars Arendt-Nielsen,Kelun Wang. Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients With or Without Ongoing Pain One Year After Orthognathic Surgery. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014. 28(4);306-316.

References

1. Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: A review of 655 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1128–1136; discus-sion 1137.

2. Kim SG, Park SS. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2438–2444.

3. Espeland L, Hogevold HE, Stenvik A. A 3-year patient-centred follow-up of 516 consecutively treated orthognathic surgery patients. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:24–30.

4. Kim YK, Kim SG, Kim JH. Altered sensation after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:893–898.

5. Steel BJ, Cope MR. Unusual and rare complications of orthognathic surgery: A literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1678–1691.

6. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Soukka T, Virtanen A, Forssell H. Subjective sensory symptoms associated with axonal and demyelinating nerve injuries after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:e208–e213.

7. Gianni AB, D’Orto O, Biglioli F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R. Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30:295–303.

8. Phillips C, Essick G, Blakey G 3rd, Tucker M. Relationship between patients’ perceptions of postsurgical sequelae and altered sensations after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:597–607.

9. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H. Recovery of nerve injury after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Diagnostic value of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in the follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:134–140.

10. Essick GK, Phillips C, Turvey TA, Tucker M. Facial altered sensation and sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:577–582.

11. Ow A, Cheung LK. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:756–760.

12. Karas ND, Boyd SB, Sinn DP. Recovery of neurosensory function following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48:124–134.

13. Park JW, Choung PH, Kho HS, Kim YK, Chung JW. A comparison of neurosensory alteration and recovery pattern among different types of orthognathic surgeries using the current perception threshold. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:24–33.

14. Joss CU, Thuer UW. Neurosensory and functional impairment in sagittal split osteotomies: A longitudinal and long-term fol-low-up study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:263–271.

15. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:425–428.

16. Phillips C, Essick G, Zuniga J, Tucker M, Blakey G 3rd. Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1751–1760.

17. Jaaskelainen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Virtanen A, Tenovuo O, Forssell H. Sensory regeneration following intraoperatively verified trigeminal nerve injury. Neurology 2004;62:1951–1957.

18. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen S, Forssell K, Virtanen A, Forssell H. An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:15–23.

19. D’Agostino A, Trevisiol L, Gugole F, Bondi V, Nocini PF. Complications of orthognathic surgery: The inferior alveolar nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1189–1195.

20. Travess HC, Cunningham SJ, Newton JT. Recovery of sensation after orthognathic treatment: Patients’ perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:251–259.

21. Kobayashi A, Yoshimasu H, Kobayashi J, Amagasa T. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy ver-sus inverted L ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64:778–784.

22. Phillips C, Essick G. Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: A review of assessment issues. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:547–554.

23. Jaaskelainen SK. Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:85–107.

24. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Thygesen T, Juhl GI, Jensen TS. Overview on tools and methods to assess neuropathic trigeminal pain. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:332–338.

25. Cunningham LL, Tiner BD, Clark GM, Bays RA, Keeling SD, Rugh JD. A comparison of questionnaire versus monofilament assessment of neurosensory deficit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:454–459; discussion 459–460.

26. Thygesen TH, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P. Sensory action potentials of the maxillary nerve: A methodologic study with clinical implications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:537–542.

27. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Forssell K, et al. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:33–39.

28. Jaaskelainen SK, Peltola JK, Lehtinen R. The mental nerve blink reflex in the diagnosis of lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve following orthognathic surgery of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;34:87–95.

29. Nakagawa K, Ueki K, Matsumoto N, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Ooe H. The assessment of trigeminal sensory nerve paraesthesia after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Modified somatosensory evoked potentials recording method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:97–101.

30. Jaaskelainen SK. The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:355–359.

31. Thygesen TH, Norholt SE, Jensen J, Svensson P. Spatial and temporal assessment of orofacial somatosensory sensitivity: A methodological study. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:19–28.

32. Ylikontiola L, Vesala J, Oikarinen K. Repeatability of 5 clinical neurosensory tests used in orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2001;16:36–46.

33. Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: A comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006;10:77–88.

34. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006;123: 231–243.

35. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

36. Matos R, Wang K, Jensen JD, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the trigeminal region: Site and gender differences. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:161–169.

37. Pfau DB, Rolke R, Nickel R, Treede RD, Daublaender M. Somatosensory profiles in subgroups of patients with myogenic temporomandibular disorders and Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Pain 2009;147:72–83.

38. Maier C, Baron R, Tolle TR, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes. Pain 2010;150:439–450.

39. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

40. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–299.

41. Forssell H, Tenovuo O, Silvoniemi P, Jaaskelainen SK. Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain. Neurology 2007;69:1451–1459.

42. de Santana Santos T, Albuquerque KM, Santos ME, Laureano Filho JR. Survey on complications of orthognathic surgery among oral and maxillofacial surgeons. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:e423–e430.

43. Abrahamsson C, Ekberg E, Henrikson T, Bondemark L. Alterations of temporomandibular disorders before and after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:729–734.

44. Al-Riyami S, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Orthognathic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. Part 1. A new quality-assessment technique and analysis of study characteristics and classifications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:624.e1–e15; discussion 624–625.

45. Panula K, Somppi M, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Effects of orthognathic surgery on temporomandibular joint dysfunction. A controlled prospective 4-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29:183–187.

46. Dervis E, Tuncer E. Long-term evaluations of temporoman-dibular disorders in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery compared with a control group. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:554–560.

47. Onizawa K, Schmelzeisen R, Vogt S. Alteration of temporo-mandibular joint symptoms after orthognathic surgery: Comparison with healthy volunteers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:117–121; discussion 122–123.

48. Abrahamsson C, Ekberg E, Henrikson T, Nilner M, Sunzel B, Bondemark L. TMD in consecutive patients referred for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 2009;79:621–627.

49. Abrahamsson C, Henrikson T, Nilner M, Sunzel B, Bondemark L, Ekberg EC. TMD before and after correction of dentofacial deformities by orthodontic and orthognathic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:752–758.

50. Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 2000;93: 1123–1133.

51. Cruccu G, Sommer C, Anand P, et al. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: Revised 2009. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:1010–1018.

52. Baad-Hansen L, Arima T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Neumann-Jensen B, Svensson P. Quantitative sensory tests before and 1(1/2) years after orthognathic surgery: A cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:313–321.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top