Article Data

  • Views 469
  • Dowloads 71

Original Research

Open Access

Treating Temporomandibular Disorders in Adolescents: A Randomized, Controlled, Sequential Comparison of Relaxation Training and Occlusal Appliance Therapy

  • Kerstin Wahlund1,*,
  • Ing-Marie Nilsson2,3
  • Bo Larsson4,5

1Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden

2Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Norrköping, Sweden

3Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

4Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare –Central Norway, St Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

5National Competency Centre for Complex Disorders, St Olav Hospital,Trondheim, Norway

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1285 Vol.29,Issue 1,March 2015 pp.41-50

Published: 30 March 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Kerstin Wahlund E-mail: Kerstin.Wahlund@ltkalmar.se

Abstract

Aims: To compare the effects of occlusal appliance therapy (OA) and therapist-guided relaxation training (RT) on temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adolescents, thereby replicating a previous randomized controlled trial, and to explore whether additional therapy administered in a crossover sequential design improves treatment outcomes. Methods: The study involved 64 adolescents, aged 12 to 19 years, experiencing TMD pain at least once a week and diagnosed with myofascial pain in accordance with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. For phase 1 of the study, subjects were randomly assigned to OA or RT; nonresponders were offered the other treatment in phase 2. Self-reports of TMD pain and clinical assessments were performed before and after treatment in each phase and 6 months after the last treatment phase. Differences in outcomes between treatment groups across the different phases were analyzed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and for differences in proportions, the chi-square test was used. Results: After phase 1, a significantly higher proportion of adolescents treated with OA (62.1%) than those treated with RT (17.9%) responded to treatment, defined as a subjective report of “Completely well/Very much improved” or “Much improved.” Similar differences in self- report of treatment effect occurred after phase 2. About two-thirds of all adolescents in both phases reported such an improvement level at the 6-month follow-up, including a somewhat higher proportion of phase 1 responders (79.2%) than phase 1 nonresponders (60%). Conclusion: The findings suggest that, for adolescents with TMD pain, use of standardized clinical treatment with OA is more effective than RT on self-evaluation of treatment improvement. For nonresponders, subsequent crossover treatment might be useful to improve subjective TMD pain.

Keywords

adolescence; occlusal appliance; randomized controlled trial; relaxation training; temporomandibular disorders

Cite and Share

Kerstin Wahlund,Ing-Marie Nilsson,Bo Larsson. Treating Temporomandibular Disorders in Adolescents: A Randomized, Controlled, Sequential Comparison of Relaxation Training and Occlusal Appliance Therapy. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2015. 29(1);41-50.

References

1. Wänman A, Agerberg G. Recurrent headaches and craniomandibular disorders in adolescents: A longitudinal study. J Craniomandib Disord 1987;1:229–236.

2. List T, Wahlund K, Wenneberg B, Dworkin SF. TMD in children and adolescents: Prevalence of pain, gender differences, and perceived treatment need. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:9–20.

3. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Prevalence of temporoman-dibular pain and subsequent dental treatment in Swedish adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:144–150.

4. Drangsholdt M, LeResche L. Temporomandibular disorder pain. In: Crombie IK, Croft DR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Von Korff M (eds). Epidemiology of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 1999: 203–233.

5. List T, Wahlund K, Larsson B. Psychosocial functioning and dental factors in adolescents with temporomandibular disorders: A case-control study. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:218–227.

6. Bonjardim LR, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Anxiety and depression in adolescents and their relationship with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:347–352.

7. Nilsson IM, Drangsholt M, List T. Impact of temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents: Differences by age and gender. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:115–122.

8. Hirsch C, Türp JC. Temporomandibular pain and depres-sion in adolescents—A case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:145–151.

9. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. The reliability and validity of self-reported temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:138–144.

10. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ. Oral splints: The crutches for temporoman-dibular disorders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998; 9:345–361.

11. Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of evidence-based medicine to occlusal treatment for temporoman-dibular disorders: Are there lessons to be learned? J Orofac Pain 2004;18:9–22.

12. Türp JC, Komine F, Hugger A. Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: A qualitative systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8: 179–195.

13. Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Sloan P, Glenny AM. Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;1: CD002778.

14. Okeson JP, Moody PM, Kemper JT, Haley JV. Evaluation of occlusal splint therapy and relaxation procedures in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:420–424.

15. Crider AB, Glaros AG. A meta-analysis of EMG biofeedback treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999; 13:29–37.

16. Liu HX, Liang QJ, Xiao P, Jiao HX, Gao Y, Ahmetjiang A. The ef-fectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for temporoman-dibular disorders: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39:55–62.

17. Turk DC, Zaki HS, Rudy TE. Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression in patients with temporomandibu-lar disorders. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:158–164.

18. List T, Axelsson S. Management of TMD: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37: 430–451.

19. Larsson B, Carlsson J, Fichtel Å, Melin L. Relaxation treatment of adolescent headache sufferers: Results from a school-based replication series. Headache 2005;45:692–704.

20. Trautmann E, Lackschewitz H, Kröner-Herwig B. Psychological treatment of recurrent headache in children and adolescents—A meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2006;26:1411–1426.

21. Palermo TM, Eccleston C, Lewandowski AS, Williams AC, Morley S. Randomized controlled trials of psychological therapiesfor management of chronic pain in children and adolescents: An updated meta-analytic review. Pain 2010;148: 387–397.

22. Eccleston C, Palermo TM, de C Williams AC, et al. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD003968.

23. Wahlund K, List T, Larsson B. Treatment of temporomandibular disorders among adolescents: A comparison between occlusal appliance, relaxation training, and brief information. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:203–211.

24. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examination and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

25. Clark GT. Interocclusal appliance therapy. In: Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD (eds). A Textbook of Occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence, 1988:271–284.

26. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: Reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42–51.

27. Seymore RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME. An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 1985;21:177–185.

28. Blanchard EB, Andrasik F, Evans DD, Neff DF, Appelbaum KA, Rodichok LD. Behavioral treatment of 250 chronic headache patients: A clinical replication series. Behav Ther 1985;16: 308–327.

29. Blanchard EB, Andrasik F, Neff DF, Jurish SE, O’Keefe DM. Social validation of the headache diary. Behav Ther 1981;12: 711–715.

30. Larsson B, Melin L. The psychological treatment of recurrent headache in adolescents—Short-term outcome and its prediction. Headache 1988;28:187–195.

31. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an11- point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149–158.

32. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8:1–96.

33. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1988.

34. Birnie KA, McGrath PJ, Chambers CT. When does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance. Pain 2012;153:2311–2314.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top