Article Data

  • Views 354
  • Dowloads 65

Original Research

Open Access

Subtyping Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders in a Primary Health Care Setting on the Basis of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Pain-Related Disability: A Step Toward Tailored Treatment Planning?

  • Ulla Kotiranta1
  • Tuija Suvinen2,3
  • Tommi Kauko4
  • Yrsa Le Bell2
  • Pentti Kemppainen5,6
  • Jorma Suni7
  • Heli Forssell2,*,

1Institute of Dentistry, University of Eastern Finland, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

2Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

3University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

4Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

5Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

6Department of Oral Diseases, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

7Oral Health Corporation, Vantaa, Finland

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1319 Vol.29,Issue 2,June 2015 pp.126-134

Published: 30 June 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Heli Forssell E-mail: heli.forssell@utu.fi

Abstract

Aims: To use the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis II and additional pain-related and psychosocial variables to identify subtypes of TMD patients in a primary health care setting based on pain-related disability. Methods: Consecutive TMD pain patients (n = 399) seeking treatment in a primary care setting completed a multidimensional pain questionnaire. Subtyping was based on the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), and the patients were divided into a no-disability group (0 disability points), low-disability group (1–2 disability points), and high-disability group (3–6 disability points). Psychosocial variables included RDC/TMD Axis II variables, anxiety, tension and stress, worry, catastrophizing, coping ability, general health, and other pain problems. Subtype differences were analyzed with t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test. A further analysis with multivariable logistic model was applied. All P values from pairwise comparisons were Bonferroni adjusted. Results: Most (61%) of the patients belonged to the no-disability group, 27% to the low-disability group, and 12% to the high-disability group. When subtypes were compared, patients in the no-disability group appeared psychosocially well-functioning, with fewer symptoms related to psychosocial distress, better ability to control pain, and fewer jaw functional limitations and other pain problems. Patients in the high-disability group reported the highest levels of symptoms of depression and somatization, sleep dysfunction, worry, and catastrophizing thoughts. The low-disability patients formed an intermediate group between the no-disability and high-disability groups. Conclusion: The results suggest that GCPS-related disability scoring can be used as a simple screening instrument in primary care settings to identify individuals with different, clinically relevant psychosocial subtypes.

Keywords

biopsychosocial; Graded Chronic Pain Scale; primary health care; RDC/TMD Axis II; TMD pain

Cite and Share

Ulla Kotiranta,Tuija Suvinen,Tommi Kauko,Yrsa Le Bell,Pentti Kemppainen,Jorma Suni,Heli Forssell. Subtyping Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders in a Primary Health Care Setting on the Basis of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Pain-Related Disability: A Step Toward Tailored Treatment Planning?. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2015. 29(2);126-134.

References

1. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: Clinicalsigns in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120:273–281.

2. Kurita K, Westesson PL, Yuasa H, Toyama M, Machida J, Ogi N. Natural course of untreated symptomatic temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. J Dent Res 1998; 77:361–365.

3. Rammelsberg P, LeResche L, Dworkin S, Mancl L. Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: A 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2003; 17:9–20.

4. Manfredini D, Favero L, Gregorini G, Cocilovo F, Guarda-Nardini L. Natural course of temporomandibular disorders with low pain-related impairment: A 2-to-3-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:436–442.

5. Greene CS. Managing the care of patients with temporoman-dibular disorders. A new guideline for care. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:1086–1088.

6. Schindler HJ, Svensson P. Myofascial temporomandibular disorder pain. Pathophysiology and management. In: Turp JC, Sommer C, Hugger A (eds). The Puzzle of Orofacial Pain. Integrating Research into Clinical Management. Pain and Headache, vol 15. Basel: Karger, 2007:91–123.

7. Ohrbach R, List T. Predicting treatment responsiveness: Somatic and psychological factors. In: Greene CS, Laskin DM (eds).Treatment of TMDs: Bridging the Gap Between Advances in Research and Clinical Patient Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2013:91–98.

8. Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF. Five-year outcomes in TMD: Relationship of changes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables. Pain 1998;74:315–326.

9. Benoliel R, Svensson P, Heir GM, et al. Persistent orofacial muscle pain. Oral Diseases 2011;17:23–41.

10. Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, et al. Potential psychosocial risk factors for chronic TMD: Descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study. J Pain 2011;12:T46–T60.

11. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differential treatment responses of TMD patients as a function of psychological characteristics. Pain 1995;61:103–112.

12. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, Könönen M, Dworkin SF. Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: Towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain 2005;9:613–633.

13. Von Korff M, Dunn KM. Chronic pain reconsidered. Pain 2008; 138:267–276.

14. Litt MD, Shafer DM, Kreutzer DL. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: Long-term outcomes and moderators of treatment. Pain 2010;151:110–116.

15. Velly AM, Look JO, Carlson C, et al. The effect of catastrophiz-ing and depression on chronic pain—A prospective cohort study of temporomandibular muscle and joint pain disorders. Pain 2011;152:2377–2383.

16. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for tem-poromandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Dis 1992;6:301–355; www.rdc-tmdinternational.org.

17. Suvinen T, Rantala M, Ahlberg J, Könönen M. RDCTMD_FIN. www.rdc-tmdinternational.org.

18. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

19. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L. Graded chronic pain status: An epidemiologic evaluation. Pain 1990;14:279–291.

20. John MT, Reissman DR, Schlerz O, Wassell RW. Oral health- related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:46–54.

21. Manfredini D, Winocur E, Ahlberg J, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F. Psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorders patients. RDC/TMD axis II findings from a multicenter study. J Dent 2010;38:765–772.

22. Manfredini D, Borella L, Favero L, Ferronato G, Guarda-Nardini L. Chronic pain severity and depression/somatization levels in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:529–534.

23. Ozdemir-Karatas M, Peker K, Balik A, Uysal O, Tuncer EB. Identifying potential predictors of pain-related disability in Turkish patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain. J Head Pain 2013;14:1–17.

24. Garofalo JP, Gatchel RJ, Wesley AL, Ellis 3rd E. Predicting chronicity in acute temporomandibular joint disorder using research diagnostic criteria. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:438–447.

25. Kotiranta U, Suvinen T, Forssell H. Tailored treatments in TMD– Where are we now? A systematic qualitative literature review. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:28–37.

26. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, et al. A randomized clinical trial using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders-Axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care TMD treat-ment program. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:48–63.

27. Truelove E, Huggins KH, Mancl L, Dworkin SF. The efficacy of traditional, low-cost and nonsplint therapies for temporoman-dibular disorder. A randomized controlled trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1099–1107.

28. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored compherensive care treatment program for tem-poromandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:259–276.

29. Turner JA, Mancl L, Aaron A. Short- and long-term efficacy of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic tem-poromandibular disorder pain: A randomized, controlled trial. Pain 2006;121:181–194.

30. Anderson G, Gonzales Y, Ohrbach R, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. VI: Future directions. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:79–88.

31. Palla S. Biopsychosocial pain model crippled? [Editorial] J Orofac Pain 2011;25:289–290.

32. Yap AUJ, Chua EK, Dworkin SF, Tan HH, Tan KBC. Multiple pains and psychosocial functioning/psychologic distress in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:461–466.

33. Yap AUJ, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KBC, Tan HH. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychosocial dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21–28.

34. Lee LTK, Yeung RWK, Wong MCM, McMillan AS. Diagnostic sub-types, psychological distress and psychosocial dysfunction in southern Chinese people with temporomandibular disorder. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:184–190.

35. Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F. Correlation of RDC/TMD Axis I and Axis II pain-related disability. A multicenter study. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:749–756.

36. Suvinen TI, Kemppainen P, Le Bell Y, Valjakka A, Vahlberg T, Forssell H. Research diagnostic criteria Axis II in screening andas a part of biopsychosocial subtyping of Finnish patients with tem-poromandibular disorder pain. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:314–324.

37. Stohler C, Zarb GA. On the management of temporomandibular disorders: A plea for a low-tech, high-prudence therapeutic approach. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:255–261.

38. Ommerborn MA, Kollmann C, Handschel J, Depprich RA, Lang H, Raab WH-M. A survey on German dentists regarding the management of craniomandibular disorders. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14:137–144.

39. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. The reliability and validity of self-reported temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:138–144.

40. Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: The predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003;19:80–86.

41. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–532.

42. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983;17:33–44.

43. Reissman DR, John MT, Wassell RW, Hinz A. Psychosocial profiles of diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorderpatients. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:237–244.

44. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporoman-dibular disorders: A systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:453–462.

45. Liegey Dougall A, Jimenez CA, Haggard RA, Stowell AW, Riggs RR, Gatchel RJ. Biopsychosocial factors associated with the subcategories of acute temporomandibular joint disorders. J Orofac Pain 2012;26:7–16.

46. Licini F, Nojelli A, Segù M, Collesano V. Role of psychosocial factors in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders: Relevance of biaxial diagnosis. Minerva Stomatol 2009;58:557–566.

47. Ohrbach R, Turner JA, Sherman JJ, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. IV: Evaluation f psychometric properties of the Axis II measures. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:48–62.

48. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6–27.

49. Ohrbach R, Fillingim RB, Mulkey F, et al. Clinical findings and pain symptoms as potential risk factors for chronic TMD: Descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study. J Pain 2011;12:T27–T45.

50. Velly A, Schweinhardt P, Fricton J. Comorbid conditions: How they affect orofacial pain. In: Greene CS, Laskin DM (eds). Treatment of TMDs: Bridging the Gap Between Advances in Research and Clinical Patient Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2013:47–56.

51. Winocur E, Steinkeller-Dekel M, Reiter S, Eli I. A retrospective analysis of temporomandibular findings among Israeli-born patients based on the RDC/TMD. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:11–17.

52. Slade GD, Sanders AE, Bair E, et al. Preclinical episodes of orofacial pain symptoms and their association with health care behaviors in the OPPERA prospective cohort study. Pain 2013;154:750–760.

53. Palla S. A need to redefine chronic pain? [Editorial] J Orofac Pain 2006;20:265–266.

54. Gatchel RJ, Stowell AW, Wildenstein L, Riggs R, Ellis E 3rd. Efficacy of an early intervention for patients with acute temporo-mandibular disorder-related pain: A one-year outcome study. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:339–347.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top