Article Data

  • Views 414
  • Dowloads 72

Original Research

Open Access

Analysis of Pain in the Rabbit Temporomandibular Joint After Unilateral Splint Placement

  • Sarah E. Henderson1
  • Mauro A. Tudares2
  • Michael S. Gold3
  • Alejandro J. Almarza1,2,4,*,

1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

2Department of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1371 Vol.29,Issue 2,June 2015 pp.193-202

Published: 30 June 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Alejandro J. Almarza E-mail: aja19@pitt.edu

Abstract

Aims: To determine whether behavioral, anatomical, and physiologic endpoints widely used to infer the presence of pain in rodent models of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were applicable to the rabbit model of TMD associated with altered joint loading. Methods: Unilateral molar dental splints were used to alter temporomandibular joint (TMJ) loading. Changes in nociceptive threshold were assessed with a mechanical probing of the TMJ region on nine splinted and three control rabbits. Fos-like immunoreacitivty in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis was assessed with standard immunohistochemical techniques from three splinted and six control animals. Retrogradely labeled TMJ afferents were studied with patch-clamp electrophysiologic techniques from three splinted and three control animals. Remodeling of TMJ condyles was assessed by histologic investigations of three splinted and three control animals. A Student t test or a Mann-Whitney U test was used with significance set at P < .05 to compare splinted to control samples. Results: While variable, there was an increase in mechanical sensitivity in splinted rabbits relative to controls. The increase in Fos+ cells in splinted rabbits was also significant relative to naïve controls (86 ± 8 vs 64 ± 15 cells/section, P < .05). The rheobase (364 ± 80 pA) and action potential threshold (–31.2 ± 2.0 mV) were higher in TMJ afferents from splinted rabbits compared to controls (99 ± 22 pA and –38.0 ± 2.0 mV, P < .05). There was significant remodeling in the condylar fibrocartilage layers as manifested by a change in glycosaminoglycan distribution and a loss of defined cell layers. Conclusion: Behavioral and anatomical results were consistent with an increase in nociceptive signaling in concert with condylar remodeling driven by altered TMJ loading. Changes in excitability and action potential waveform were consistent with possible compensatory changes of TMJ afferents for an overall increase in afferent drive associated with joint degeneration. These compensatory changes may reflect pain-adaption processes that many patients with TMJ disorders experience.

Keywords

altered loading; fibrocartilage degeneration; pain assessments; temporomandibular joint; unilateral splint

Cite and Share

Sarah E. Henderson,Mauro A. Tudares,Michael S. Gold,Alejandro J. Almarza. Analysis of Pain in the Rabbit Temporomandibular Joint After Unilateral Splint Placement. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2015. 29(2);193-202.

References

1. Gray RJM, Davies SJ, Quayle AA. Temporomandibular Disorders: A Clinical Approach. London: British Dental Association, 1995.

2. Jagger RG, Bates JF, Kopp S. Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: Essentials. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.

3. Ware WH. Clinical presentation. In: Helms CA, Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF (eds). Internal Derangements of the Temporomandibular Joint. San Francisco, CA: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1983:15–30.

4. Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the Temporomandibular joint: Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res 2008;87:296–307.

5. Chaves K, Munerato MC, Ligocki A, Lauxen I, De Quadros OF. Microscopic analysis of the temporomandibular joint in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) using an occlusal interference. Cranio 2002;20:116–124.

6. Mao JJ, Rahemtulla F, Scott PG. Proteoglycan expression in the rat temporomandibular joint in response to unilateral bite raise. J Dent Res 1998;77:1520–1528.

7. Ren K. An improved method for assessing mechanical allodynia in the rat. Physiol Behav 1999;67:711–716.

8. Zhou Q, Imbe H, Dubner R, Ren K. Persistent Fos protein expression after orofacial deep or cutaneous tissue inflammationin rats: Implications for persistent orofacial pain. J Comp Neurol 1999;412:276–291.

9. Flake NM, Bonebreak DB, Gold MS. Estrogen and inflammation increase the excitability of rat temporomandibular joint afferent neurons. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:1585–1597.

10. Sergl HG, Farmand M. Experiments with unilateral bite planes in rabbits. Angle Orthod 1975;45:108–114.

11. Shaw RM, Molyneux GS. The effects of induced dental malocclusion on the fibrocartilage disc of the adult rabbit temporo-mandibular joint. Arch Oral Bio 1993;38:415–422.

12. Coggeshall RE. Fos, nociception and the dorsal horn. Prog Neurobiol 2005;77:299–352.

13. Bereiter DA, Okamoto K, Bereiter DF. Effect of persistent monoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint region on acute mustard oil-induced excitation of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis neurons in male and female rats. Pain 2005;117:58–67.

14. Lu Y, McNearney TA, Wilson SP, Yeomans DC, Westlund KN. Joint capsule treatment with enkephalin-encoding HSV-1 recombinant vector reduces inflammatory damage and behavioural sequelae in rat CFA monoarthritis. Euro J Neurosci 2008;27:1153–1165.

15. Charra R, Datiche F, Gigot V, Schaal B, Coureaud G. Pheromone-induced odor learning modifies Fos expression in the newborn rabbit brain. Behav Brain Res 2013;237:129–140.

16. Harriott AM, Gold MS. Electrophysiological properties of dural afferents in the absence and presence of inflammatory mediators. J Neurophysiol 2009;101:3126–3134.

17. Benson CJ, Eckert SP, McCleskey EW. Acid-evoked currents in cardiac sensory neurons: A possible mediator of myocardial ischemic sensation. Circ Res 1999;84:921–928.

18. Cairns BE, Sessle BJ, Hu JW. Characteristics of glutamate-evoked temporomandibular joint afferent activity in the rat. J Neurophysiol 2001;85:2446–2454.

19. Kido MA, Kiyoshima T, Ibuki T, et al. A topographical and ultrastructural study of sensory trigeminal nerve endings in the rat temporomandibular joint as demonstrated by anterograde transport of wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP). J Dent Res 1995;74:1353–1359.

20. Takeuchi Y, Ishii N, Toda K. An in vitro temporomandibular jointnerve preparation for pain study in rats. J Neurosci Methods 2001;109:123–128.

21. Diernberger S, Bernhardt O, Schwahn C, Kordass B. Self-reported chewing side preference and its associations with occlusal, temporomandibular and prosthodontic factors: Results from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-0). J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:613–620.

22. Watanabe EK, Yatani H, Kuboki T, et al. The relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and bilateral occlusal contact patterns during lateral excursions. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:409–415.

23. Cutrer FM, Limmroth V, Ayata G, Moskowitz MA. Attenuation by valproate of c-fos immunoreactivity in trigeminal nucleus caudalis induced by intracisternal capsaicin. Br J Pharmacol 1995;116:3199–3204.

24. Hoskin KL, Zagami AS, Goadsby PJ. Stimulation of the middle meningeal artery leads to Fos expression in the trigeminocervical nucleus: A comparative study of monkey and cat. J Anat 1999;194:579–588.

25. Harris JA. Using c-fos as a Neural Marker of Pain. Brain Res Bull 1998;45:1–8.

26. Ikeda T, Terayama R, Jue SS, Sugiyo S, Dubner R, Ren K. Differential rostral projections of caudal brainstem neurons receiving trigeminal input after masseter inflammation. J Comp Neurol 2003;465:220–233.

27. Jankowski MP, Lawson JJ, McIlwrath SL, et al. Sensitization of cutaneous nociceptors after nerve transection and regeneration: Possible role of target-derived neurotrophic factor signaling. J Neurosci 2009;29:1636–1647.

28. Kessler W, Kirchhoff C, Reeh PW, Handwerker HO. Excitation of cutaneous afferent nerve endings in vitro by a combination of inflammatory mediators and conditioning effect of substance P. Exp Brain Res 1992;91:467–476.

29. Lawson JJ, McIlwrath SL, Woodbury CJ, Davis BM, Koerber HR. TRPV1 unlike TRPV2 is restricted to a subset of mechanically insensitive cutaneous nociceptors responding to heat. J Pain 2008;9:298–308.

30. Mizumura K. Natural history of nociceptor sensitization: The search fora peripheral mechanism of hyperalgesia. Pain Rev 1998;5:59.

31. Kawamura Y, Abe K. Role of sensory information from tem-poromandibular joint. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1974;21 (suppl):78–82.

32. Lund JP, Matthews B. Responses of muscle and joint afferents recorded from the Gasserian ganglion of rabbits [proceedings]. J Physiol 1979;293:38P–39P.

33. Gold MS, Dastmalchi S, Levine JD. Co-expression of nociceptor properties in dorsal root ganglion neurons from the adult rat in vitro. Neuroscience 1996;71:265–275.

34. Takeda M, Tsuboi Y, Kitagawa J, Nakagawa K, Iwata K, Matsumoto S. Potassium channels as a potential therapeutic target for trigeminal neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Molecular Pain 2011 Jan 10;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-7-5.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top