Sense of Coherence and Toothache of Adolescents from Southern Brazil

Aims: To investigate the association in adolescents between toothache and sense of coherence (SOC), a psychosocial construct defined as a global orientation to life. Methods: A school-based cross-sectional study was carried out in 36 municipalities comprising up to 50,000 residents in southern Brazil. The target population was adolescents from 15 to 19 years of age. The sample consisted of 1,150 adolescents chosen by systematic sampling; the final adjusted analysis by Poisson regression included 1,065 individuals. Data were collected using a questionnaire, SOC scale, and the Decayed Missing Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. Results: Of the adolescents in the sample, 29.8% reported experiencing toothache in the previous 6 months. The prevalence of dental caries was 31.0%, and the DMFT index was 3.22. SOC was a significant protective factor for toothache; the prevalence ratio was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55–0.75). Girls presented 39% more toothaches than boys (95% CI = 1.15–1.68). Individuals who saw the dentist for reasons other than reviews or check-ups had a toothache prevalence that was 85% higher than their counterparts (95% CI = 1.47–2.34). Adolescents with tooth decay reported up to two times more toothache than those without tooth decay. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that a strong SOC protected against toothache. A health-promotion approach may lead to better patterns of oral health.

cross-sectional study; health of the adolescent; pain; sense of coherence; toothache

1. Constante HM, Bastos JL, Peres KG, Peres MA. Socio-demographic and behavioural inequalities in the impact of dental pain among adults: A population-based study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:498–506.

2. Petersen PE, Burgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:661–669.

3. Pau AK, Croucher R, Marcenes W. Prevalence estimates and associated factors for dental pain: A review. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003;1:209–220.

4. Brasil. SB Brasil 2010. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal. Resultados Principais. http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/geral/projeto_sb2010_relatorio_final.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2015.

5. Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int 1996;11:11–18.

6. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:725–733.

7. Surtees PG, Wainwright N, Luben R, Khaw KT, Day N. Sense of coherence and mortality in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk United Kingdom prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:1202–1209.

8. Kouvonen AM, Vaananen A, Woods SA, et al. Sense of coherence and diabetes: A prospective occupational cohort study. BMC Public Health 2008;8:46.

9. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and relation with health: A systematic review. J EpidemiolCommunity Health 2006;60:376–381.

10. Mattila ML, Rautava P, Honkinen PL, et al. Sense of coherence and health behaviour in adolescence. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1590–1595.

11. Freire MC, Sheiham A, Hardy R. Adolescents’ sense of coherence, oral health status, and oral health-related behaviours. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:204–212.

12. Lindmark U, Hakeberg M, Hugoson A. Sense of coherence and its relationship with oral health-related behaviour and knowledge of and attitudes towards oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011;39:542–553.

13. Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, et al. Adolescence: A foundation for future health. Lancet 2012;379:1630–1640.

14. IBGE. Available at http://cod.ibge.gov.br/8BV. Accessed 12 June 2015.

15. Peres KG, Cascaes AM, Leão ATT, Côrtes MI, Vettore MV. Aspectos sóciodemograficos e clínicos da qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal em adolescentes. Rev Sau Publica 2013;47:19–28.

16. Bernabé E, Watt RG, Sheiham A, et al. Sense of coherence and oral health in dentate adults: Findings from the Finnish Health 2000 Survey. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:981–987.

17. Bernabé E, Watt RG, Sheiham A, et al. Childhood socioeconomic position, adult sense of coherence and tooth retention. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:46–52.

18. Bernabé E, Newton JT, Uutela A, Aromaa A, Suominen AL. Sense of coherence and four-year caries incidence in Finnish adults. Caries Res 2012;46:523–529.

19. Bastos JLD, Gigante DP, Peres KG, Nedel FB. Social determinants of odontalgia in epidemiological studies: Theoretical review and proposed conceptual model. Cien Saude Colet 2007;12:1611–1621.

20. Bonanato K, Branco DBT, Mota JPT, et al. Trans-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the ‘sense of coherence scale’ in mothers of preschool children. Interamerican J Psychol 2009;43:144–153.

21. Bernabé E, Watt RG, Sheiham A, et al. The influence of sense of coherence on the relationship between childhood socioeconomic status and adult oral health-related behaviours. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37:357–365.

22. McGrath C, Bedi R. Public dental health: Can dental attendance improve quality of life? Br Dent J 2001;190:262–265.

23. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:21.

24. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;460–466.

25. Bobey M, Davidson PO. Psychological factors affecting pain tolerance. J Psychosom Res 1970;14:371–376.

26. Andrews NE, Meredith PJ, Strong J. Adult attachment and reports of pain in experimentally-induced pain. Eur J Pain 2011;15:523–530.

27. Slade GD. Epidemiology of dental pain and dental caries among children and adolescents. Community Dent Health 2001;18:219–227.

28. Siminsson B, Nilsson KW, Leppert J, Diwan VK. Psychosomatic complaints and sense of coherence among adolescents in acounty in Sweden: A cross-sectional school survey. Biopsychosoc Med 2008;2:4.

29. Nielsen AM, Hansson K. Associations between adolescents’ health, stress and sense of coherence. Stress and Health 2007;23:331–341.

30. Sipilä K, Ylöstalo P, Könönen M, Uutela A, Knuuttila M. Association of sense of coherence and clinical signs of tem-poromandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:147–152.

31. Baker SR, Mat A, Robinson PG. What psychosocial factors influence adolescent’s oral health? J Dent Res 2010;89: 1230–1235.

32. Koushede V, Holstein BE, Andersen A, Hansen AH. Stress and medicine use for headache: Does sense of coherence modifythe association? Eur J Public Health 2010;21:656–661.

33. Ursin H. Sensization, somatization, and subjective health complaints. Int J Behav Med 1997;4:105–116.

34. Lewis C, Stout J. Toothache in US children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:1059–1063.

35. Borges CM, Cascaes AM, Fischer TK, et al. Dental and gingival pain and associated factors among Brazilian adolescents: An analysis of the Brazilian Oral Health Survey 2002–2003. Cad Saude Publica 2008;24:1825–1834.

36. Peres MA, Peres KG, Frias AC, Antunes JL. Contextual and individual assessment of dental pain period prevalence in adolescents: A multilevel approach. BMC Oral Health 2010;10:20.

37. Pau A, Khan SS, Babar MG, Croucher R. Dental pain and care-seeking in 11-14-yr-old adolescents in a low-income country. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:451–457.

38. Okunseri C, Hodges JS, Born D. Self-reported toothache experience in an adult population in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. Oral Health Prev Dent 2005;3:119–125.

39. Riley JL 3rd, Gilbert GH. Orofacial pain symptoms: An interaction between age and sex. Pain 2001;90:245–256.

40. Dao TT, LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:169–184.

41. Guiotoku SK, Moyses ST, Moyses SJ, França BHS, Bisinelli JC. Iniquidades raciais em saúde bucal no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2012;31:135–141.

42. Frias AC, Antunes JLF, Junqueira SR, Narvai PC. Determinantes individuais e contextuais da prevalência de cárie não tratada no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2007;22:279–285.

43. Vargas CM, Macek MD, Goodman HS, Wagner ML. Dental pain in Maryland school children. J Public Health Dent 2005;65:3–6.

44. Hiidenkari T, Parvinen T, Helenius H. Missing teeth and loss teeth of adults aged 30 years and over in south-western Finland. Community Dent Health 1996;13:215–222.

45. Hodbel M, Petersen PE, Clarkson J. Global goals for oral health 2020. Int Dent J 2003;53:285–88.

46. Duncan RP, Gilbert GH, Peek CW, Heft MW. The dynamics of toothache pain and dental services utilization: 24-month incidence. J Public Health Dent 2003;63:227–234.

47. Bolin AK. Children’s dental health in Europe. An epidemiological investigation of 5- and 12-year-old children from eight EU countries. Swed Dent J Suppl 1997;122:1–88.

48. Malterud K, Holnagel H. Encouraging the strengths of women patients. A case study from general practice on empowering dialogues. Scand J Public Health 1999;27:254–259.

49. Nammontri O, Robinson PG, Baker SR. Enhancing oral health via sense of coherence: A cluster-randomized trial. J Dent Res 2013;92:26–31.

50. Bryman A. Social Research Method, ed 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

51. IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios 2011. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2011.

52. Freire Mdo C, Leles CR, Sardinha LM, et al. Dental pain and associated factors in Brazilian adolescents: The National School-Based Health Survey (PeNSE), Brazil, 2009. Cad Saude Publica 2012;28:s133–s145.