Article Data

  • Views 359
  • Dowloads 43

Original Research

Open Access

Ipsilateral Molar Clenching Induces Less Pain and Discomfort than Contralateral Molar Clenching in Patients with Unilateral Anterior Disc Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint

  • Yohei Kumazaki1
  • Shigehisa Kawakami1
  • Atsutoshi Hirata1
  • Kazuhiro Oki1,*,
  • Shogo Minagi1

1Department of Occlusal and Oral Functional Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1405 Vol.30,Issue 3,September 2016 pp.241-248

Published: 30 September 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Kazuhiro Oki E-mail: kazu_z@md.okayama-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Aims: To assess the influence of clenching side and location (ie, tooth) on the bite force necessary to induce pain or discomfort in patients with unilateral anterior disc displacement (ADD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Methods: A total of 17 patients with unilateral ADD diagnosed clinically and with magnetic resonance imaging were included. A bite force meter was positioned at each of four experimental positions: the mandibular first premolars and first molars, bilaterally. Subjects were instructed to clench on the bite force meter until they felt pain or discomfort in the orofacial area and to report the location of the pain. Differences in pain location (ADD side versus contralateral side) and in the bite force thresholds for eliciting pain or discomfort were assessed by means of the paired t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Only 18% of subjects (3 out of 17) reported pain in the TMJ with ADD during clenching at the ipsilateral molar, whereas 65% (11 out of 17) reported joint pain during clenching on the contralateral molar (P = .005). At the molars, the mean ± standard deviation bite force necessary to induce pain was 241.2 ± 135.5 N on the side with ADD and 160.9 ± 78.0 N on the contralateral side. The mean molar bite force necessary to induce pain on the side with ADD was significantly higher than that on the contralateral side (P = .002). Conclusion: Patients with unilateral ADD had fewer reports of TMJ pain and discomfort when they were molar clenching on the ipsilateral side compared to molar clenching on the contralateral side.

Keywords

anterior disc displacement; bite force; preferred chewing side; temporomandibular disorders; temporomandibular joint

Cite and Share

Yohei Kumazaki,Shigehisa Kawakami,Atsutoshi Hirata,Kazuhiro Oki,Shogo Minagi. Ipsilateral Molar Clenching Induces Less Pain and Discomfort than Contralateral Molar Clenching in Patients with Unilateral Anterior Disc Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2016. 30(3);241-248.

References

1. Okeson JP. Orofacial Pain Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management, ed 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996.

2. Dolwick MF, Katzberg RW, Helms CA. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: Fact or fiction? J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:415–418.

3. Carlsson GE. Bite force and chewing efficiency. Front Oral Physiol 1974;1:265–292.

4. Beek M, Aarnts MP, Koolstra JH, Feilzer AJ, van Eijden TM. Dynamic properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res 2001;80:876–880.

5. Larheim TA, Westesson P, Sano T. Temporomandibular joint disk displacement: Comparison in asymptomatic volunteers and patients. Radiology 2001;218:428–432.

6. Paesani D, Salas E, Martinez A, Isberg A. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disk displacement in infants and young children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:15–19.

7. Stegenga B, Broekhuijsen ML, De Bont LG, Van Willigen JD. Bite-force endurance in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:639–647.

8. Kogawa EM, Calderon PS, Lauris JR, Araujo CR, Conti PC. Evaluation of maximal bite force in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:559–565.

9. Christensen LV, Radue JT. Lateral preference in mastication: A feasibility study. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:421–427.

10. Ratnasari A, Hasegawa K, Oki K, et al. Manifestation of preferred chewing side for hard food on TMJ disc displacement side. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:12–17.

11. Rues S, Lenz J, Türp JC, Schweizerhof K, Schindler HJ. Muscle and joint forces under variable equilibrium states of the mandible. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:737–747.

12. Fushima K, Gallo LM, Krebs M, Palla S. Analysis of the TMJ intraarticular space variation: A non-invasive insight during mastication. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:181–190.

13. Iwasaki LR, Thornton BR, McCall WD Jr, Nickel JC. Individual variations in numerically modeled human muscle and temporomandibular joint forces during static biting. J Orofac Pain 2004; 18:235–245.

14. Iwasaki LR, Crosby MJ, Gonzalez Y, et al. Temporomandibular joint loads in subjects with and without disc displacement. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009;1:90–93.

15. Gallo LM, Iwasaki LR, Gonzalez YM, Liu H, Marx DB, Nickel JC. Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18(suppl 1):164–169.

16. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6: 301–355.

17. Robinson de Senna B, Marques LS, França JP, Ramos-Jorge ML, Pereira LJ. Condyle-disk-fossa position and relationship to clinical signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e117–e124.

18. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Carmeli Y. Bite force in patients with functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:397–406.

19. Rudy TE, Greco CM, Yap GA, Zaki HS, Leader JK, Boston JR. The association between research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder findings and biting force and endurance in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain Med 2001;2:35–45.

20. Clark GT, Beemsterboer PL, Jacobson R. The effect of sustained submaximal clenching on maximum bite force in myofascial pain dysfunction patients. J Oral Rehabil 1984;11: 387–391.

21. Korioth TW, Hannam AG. Mandibular forces during simulated tooth clenching. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:178–189.

22. van der Bilt A, Tekamp A, van der Glas H, Abbink J. Bite force and electromyograpy during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:217–222.

23. Wang MQ, He JJ, Zhang JH, Wang K, Svensson P, Widmalm SE. SEMG activity of jaw-closing muscles during biting with different unilateral occlusal supports. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37: 719–725.

24. Hattori Y, Satoh C, Seki S, Watanabe Y, Ogino Y, Watanabe

M. Occlusal and TMJ loads in subjects with experimentally shortened dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82:532–536.

25. Larheim TA. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs 2005;180:6–21.

26. Minagi S, Ohtsuki H, Sato T, Ishii A. Effect of balancing-side occlusion on the ipsilateral TMJ dynamics under clenching. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:57–62.

27. Naeije M, Te Veldhuis AH, Te Veldhuis EC, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F. Disc displacement within the human temporomandibular joint: A systematic review of a ‘noisy annoyance’. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:139–158.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top