Article Data

  • Views 384
  • Dowloads 37

Original Research

Open Access

Amplified Brain Processing of Dentoalveolar Pressure Stimulus in Persistent Dentoalveolar Pain Disorder Patients

  • Estephan J. Moana-Filho1,*,
  • David A. Bereiter2
  • Donald R. Nixdorf1,3,4

1Division of TMD and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

2Division of Basic Sciences, Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

3Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

4 HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1463 Vol.29,Issue 4,December 2015 pp.349-362

Published: 30 December 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Estephan J. Moana-Filho E-mail: moana004@umn.edu

Abstract

Aims: (1) To determine the brain regions activated by dentoalveolar pressure stimulation in persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder (PDAP) patients, and (2) to compare these activation patterns to those seen in pain-free control subjects. Methods: A total of 13 PDAP patients and 13 matched controls completed the study. Clinical pain characteristics and psychosocial data were collected. Dentoalveolar mechanical pain thresholds were determined with a custom-made device over the painful area for patients and were used as the stimulation level during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquisition. Control subjects received two stimulation levels over matched locations during fMRI scanning: one determined (as above) that evoked equally subjective pain ratings matching those of patients (subjective-pain match) and another nonpainful stimulation level matching the average stimulus intensity provided to patients (stimulus-intensity match). Clinical and psychosocial data were analyzed using independent samples t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. fMRI data were analyzed using validated neuroimaging software and tested using a general linear model. Results: PDAP patients had greater anxiety (P < .0001) and depression scores (P = .001), more jaw function impairment (P < .0001), and greater social impact (P < .0001) than controls. No significant differences were found for brain activation spatial extent (PDAP × Controls subjective pain: P = .48; PDAP × Controls stimulus intensity: P = .12). Brain activations were significantly increased for PDAP patients compared to control subjects when matched to stimulus intensity in several regions related to the sensory-discriminative and cognitive components of pain perception, including the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, inferior parietal lobule, insula, premotor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and thalamus. When matched to subjective pain ratings, increased brain activations were still present for PDAP patients compared to controls, although to a lesser extent. Conclusion: The present results suggest that dentoalveolar pressure is processed differently in the brain of PDAP patients, and the increased activation in several brain areas is consistent with amplified pain processing.

Keywords

atypical odontalgia; functional neuroimaging; neuropathic pain; orofacial pain; sensory testing

Cite and Share

Estephan J. Moana-Filho,David A. Bereiter,Donald R. Nixdorf. Amplified Brain Processing of Dentoalveolar Pressure Stimulus in Persistent Dentoalveolar Pain Disorder Patients. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2015. 29(4);349-362.

References

1. Glaser MA. Applied neuralgia, so called: A critical analysis of one hundred and forty-three cases. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1928;20:537–558.

2. McElin TW, Horton BT. Atypical facial pain: A statistical consideration of 65 cases. Ann Intern Med 1947;27:749–768.

3. Hunter J. A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of the Teeth; Intended as a Supplement to the Natural History of Those Parts. London: J. Johnson, 1778:[6],iv,128 pp.

4. Marbach JJ. Phantom tooth pain. J Endod 1978;4:362–372.

5. Rees RT, Harris M. Atypical odontalgia. Br J Oral Surg 1979; 16:212–218.

6. Nixdorf DR, Drangsholt MT, Ettlin DA, et al. Classifying orofacial pains: A new proposal of taxonomy based on ontology. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:161–169.

7. Durham J, Exley C, John MT, Nixdorf DR. Persistent dentoalveolar pain: The patient’s experience. J Orofac Pain 2013; 27:6–13.

8. Durham J, Nixdorf DR. Healthcare pathway and biopsychosocial impact of persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder: A qualita-tive study. Int Endod J 2014;47:1151-1159.

9. Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, et al. Atypical odontalgia: A review of the literature. Headache 2003;43:1060–1074.

10. Baad-Hansen L. Atypical odontalgia—Pathophysiology and clinical management. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:1–11.

11. Nixdorf DR, Moana-Filho EJ. Persistent dento-alveolar pain disorder (PDAP): Working towards a better understanding. Rev Pain 2011;5:18–27.

12. American Dental Association. 2005-06 Survey of Dental Services Rendered. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2007.

13. Lewis MA, Sankar V, De Laat A, Benoliel R. Management of neuropathic orofacial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(suppl S32):e1–e24.

14. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing: Reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:165–170.

15. List T, Leijon G, Svensson P. Somatosensory abnormali-ties in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. Pain 2008; 139:333–341.

16. Zagury JG, Eliav E, Heir GM, et al. Prolonged gingival cold allodynia: A novel finding in patients with atypical odontalgia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111: 312–319.

17. Moana-Filho EJ, Nixdorf DR, Bereiter DA, John MT, Harel N. Evaluation of a magnetic resonance-compatible dentoalveolar tactile stimulus device. BMC Neurosci 2010;11:142.

18. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Intraoral somato-sensory abnormalities in patients with atypical odontalgia—A controlled multicenter quantitative sensory testing study. Pain 2013;154:1287–1294.

19. Baad-Hansen L, Juhl GI, Jensen TS, Brandsborg B, Svensson P. Differential effect of intravenous S-ketamine and fentanyl on atypical odontalgia and capsaicin-evoked pain. Pain 2007; 129:46–54.

20. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Svensson P. Effect of local anesthesia on atypical odontalgia—A randomized controlled trial. Pain 2006;122:306–314.

21. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Dworkin SF, Svensson P. Clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. J Orofac Pain 2007; 21:89–98.

22. Borsook D, Sava S, Becerra L. The pain imaging revolution: Advancing pain into the 21st century. The Neuroscientist 2010;16:171–185.

23. Gracely RH, Petzke F, Wolf JM, Clauw DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:1333–1343.

24. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:613–623.

25. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987;30:191–197.

26. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

27. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.

28. Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: Development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:219–230.

29. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25: 284–290.

30. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–790.

31. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(suppl 1):208S–219S.

32. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivityMRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 2012;59:2142–2154.

33. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London, UK: Sage, 2013.

34. Klasser GD, Kugelmann AM, Villines D, Johnson BR. The prevalence of persistent pain after nonsurgical root canal treatment. Quintessence Int 2011;42:259–269.

35. Graff-Radford SB, Solberg WK. Atypical odontalgia. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:260–265.

36. Oshima K, Ishii T, Ogura Y, Aoyama Y, Katsuumi I. Clinical investigation of patients who develop neuropathic tooth pain after endodontic procedures. J Endod 2009;35:958–961.

37. Albuquerque RJ, de Leeuw R, Carlson CR, Okeson JP, Miller CS, Andersen AH. Cerebral activation during thermal stimulation of patients who have burning mouth disorder: An fMRI study. Pain 2006;122:223–234.

38. Kandel ER. Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

39. Tracey I, Mantyh PW. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron 2007;55:377–391.

40. Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiol Clin 2000;30:263–288.

41. Tracey I, Bushnell MC. How neuroimaging studies have challenged us to rethink: Is chronic pain a disease? J Pain 2009; 10:1113–1120.

42. Graff-Radford SB, Ketelaer MC, Gratt BM, Solberg WK. Thermographic assessment of neuropathic facial pain. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:138–146.

43. Graff-Radford SB, Solberg WK. Differential Neural Blockade in Atypical Odontalgia—Somatic vs. Sympathetic. Cephalalgia 1991;11:289–291.

44. Vickers ER, Cousins MJ, Walker S, Chisholm K. Analysis of 50 patients with atypical odontalgia. A preliminary report on pharmacological procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:24–32.

45. Graff-Radford SB, Solberg WK. Is atypical odontalgia a psychological problem? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75:579–582.

46. Marbach JJ. Is phantom tooth pain a deafferentation (neuropathic) syndrome? Part II: Psychosocial considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:225–232.

47. Jacobs R, Wu CH, Goossens K, et al. A case-control study on the psychophysical and psychological characteristics of the phantom tooth phenomenon. Clin Oral Investig 2002;6:58–64.

48. Tassinari G, Migliorini A, Girardini F, Luzzani A. Reference fields in phantom tooth pain as a marker for remapping in the facial territory. Funct Neurol 2002;17:121–127.

49. Baad-Hansen L, Leijon G, Svensson P, List T. Comparison of clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:7–14.

50. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Kaube H, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia and matched healthy controls. Exp Brain Res 2006;172:498–506.

51. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Increased pain sensitivity to intraoral capsaicin in patients with atypical odontalgia. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:107–114.

52. Hu JW, Dostrovsky JO, Lenz YE, Ball GJ, Sessle BJ. Tooth pulp deafferentation is associated with functional alterations in the properties of neurons in the trigeminal spinal tract nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1986;56:1650–1668.

53. Hu JW, Sessle BJ. Effects of tooth pulp deafferentation on nociceptive and nonnociceptive neurons of the feline trigeminalsubnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn). J Neurophysiol 1989;61:1197–1206.

54. Kwan CL, Hu JW, Sessle BJ. Effects of tooth pulp deafferentation on brainstem neurons of the rat trigeminal subnucleus oralis. Somatosens Mot Res 1993;10:115–131.

55. Takenoshita M, Sato T, Kato Y, et al. Psychiatric diagnoses in patients with burning mouth syndrome and atypical odontalgia referred from psychiatric to dental facilities. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2010;6:699–705.

56. Ram S, Teruel A, Kumar SK, Clark G. Clinical characteristics and diagnosis of atypical odontalgia: Implications for dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:223–228.

57. Caspers S, Geyer S, Schleicher A, Mohlberg H, Amunts K, Zilles K. The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage 2006;33: 430–448.

58. Caspers S, Schleicher A, Bacha-Trams M, Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K, Zilles K. Organization of the human inferior parietal lobule based on receptor architectonics. Cereb Cortex 2013;23:615–628.

59. Moayedi M, Weissman-Fogel I, Salomons TV, et al. White matter brain and trigeminal nerve abnormalities in temporomandibular disorder. Pain 2012;153:1467–1477.

60. Weissman-Fogel I, Moayedi M, Tenenbaum HC, Goldberg MB, Freeman BV, Davis KD. Abnormal cortical activity in patients with temporomandibular disorder evoked by cognitive and emotional tasks. Pain 2011;152:384–396.

61. Lickteig R, Lotze M, Kordass B. Successful therapy for tem-poromandibular pain alters anterior insula and cerebellar representations of occlusion. Cephalalgia 2013;33:1248–1257.

62. Monti MM. Statistical Analysis of fMRI Time-Series: A Critical Review of the GLM Approach. Front Hum Neurosci 2011;5:28.

63. Woo CW, Krishnan A, Wager TD. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: Pitfalls and recommendations. Neuroimage 2014;91:412–419.

64. He SS, Li F, Song F, et al. Spontaneous neural activity alter-ations in temporomandibular disorders: A cross-sectional and longitudinal resting-state functional magnetic resonance imag-ing study. Neuroscience 2014;278:1–10.

65. Gustin SM, Peck CC, Cheney LB, Macey PM, Murray GM, Henderson LA. Pain and plasticity: Is chronic pain always associated with somatosensory cortex activity and reorganization? J Neurosci 2012;32:14874–14884.

66. Youssef AM, Gustin SM, Nash PG, et al. Differential brain activity in subjects with painful trigeminal neuropathy and painful temporomandibular disorder. Pain 2014;155:467–475.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top