Comparison of Three Techniques for Swine Temporomandibular Joint Space Injection

Aims: To compare the feasibility and accuracy of three injection techniques for entering the superior joint space of the swine temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Methods: Nine swine were used for this study, in which 500 μL of colored dye was injected into both TMJs of each swine. Three injection techniques were used: the posterior injection (PI), the anterosuperior injection (ASI), and the lateral injection (LI) techniques. Each injection technique was performed on six TMJs. Swine were sacrificed immediately after injection and the swine head was dissected in order to observe the dye distribution. Injection was considered successful if no dye could be observed outside the superior joint space. Results: The PI technique was successful in all six TMJs (success rate: 100%), the LI technique in three out of six TMJs (success rate: 50%), and the ASI technique in two out of six TMJs (success rate: 33%); the differences were statistically significant (chi-square test, P < .05). Conclusion: The PI technique was more accurate than the LI or ASI techniques in accessing the swine superior TMJ space.

animal model; injection techniques; joint space; swine; temporomandibular joint

1. Almarza AJ, Hagandora CK, Henderson SE. Animal models of temporomandibular joint disorders: Implications for tissue engineering approaches. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:2479–2490.

2. Štembírek J, Kyllar M, Putnová I, Stehlík L, Buchtová M. The pig as an experimental model for clinical craniofacial research. Lab Anim 2012;46:269–279.

3. Ström D, Holm S, Clemensson E, Haraldson T, Carlsson GE. Gross anatomy of the craniomandibular joint and masticatory muscles of the dog. Arch Oral Biol 1988;33:597–604.

4. Herring SW. TMJ anatomy and animal models. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2003;3:391–394.

5. Kalpakci KN, Willard VP, Wong ME, Athanasiou KA. An interspecies comparison of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res 2011;90:193–198.

6. Bermejo A, González O, González JM. The pig as an animal model for experimentation on the temporomandibular articularcomplex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:18–23.

7. Kaduk WM, Koppe T. Metric analysis of the upper space of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) for evaluation of the pig as a model for arthroscopic TMJ surgery. Ann Anat 2007;189:367–370.

8. Shinohara EH, Pardo-Kaba SC, Martini MZ, Horikawa FK. Single puncture for TMJ arthrocentesis: An effective technique for hydraulic distention of the superior joint space. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2012;3:96–97.

9. Wang XD, Kou XX, He DQ, et al. Progression of cartilage degradation, bone resorption and pain in rat temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis induced by injection of iodoacetate. PLoS One 2012;7:e45036.

10. Kameoka S, Matsumoto K, Kai Y, Yonehara Y, Arai Y, Honda K. Establishment of temporomandibular joint puncture technique in rats using in vivo micro-computed tomography (R_mCT®). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:441–445.

11. Guarda-Nardini L, Manfredini D, Ferronato G. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: A proposal for a single-needle technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:483–486.

12. Herring SW, Decker JD, Liu ZJ, Ma T. Temporomandibular joint in miniature pigs: Anatomy, cell replication, and relation to loading. Anat Rec 2002;266:152–166.

13. Alpaslan GH, Alpaslan C. Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:613–619.

14. Kawai N, Tanaka E, Takata T, et al. Influence of additive hyaluronic acid on the lubricating ability in the temporomandibula joint. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:149–153.

15. Stembirek J, Matalova E, Buchtova M, Machon V, Misek I. Investigation of an autologous blood treatment strategy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility in a pig model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:369–375.