Explanatory Models of Illness and Treatment Goals in Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Patients Reporting Different Levels of Pain-Related Disability

Aims: To explore whether temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain patients reporting different levels of pain-related disability differ in terms of illness explanations and treatment expectations. Methods: Consecutive TMD pain patients (n = 399; mean ± SD age, 40.5 ± 12.7 years; 83% women) seeking treatment in primary care completed the Explanatory Model Scale (EMS). Patients were asked to indicate their expectations regarding the treatment. Each patient’s pain-related disability level was determined using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale, with scores indicating no (0 disability points), low (1–2 disability points), or high (3–6 disability points) disability. Differences between EMS factor scores were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences between study groups were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: High-disability patients considered physical and stress factors as more important in causing and in aggravating pain and as targets of treatment compared with patients with no disability (P = .0196 and P = .0251, respectively). The great majority of patients indicated they would like to receive information, decrease pain, and increase jaw function, with no significant subtype differences noted. Compared with no-disability patients, low-disability and high-disability patients were more likely to expect increased ability to perform daily functions (P < .0001 in both comparisons), increased work ability (P < .0001 in both comparisons), and better stress management skills (P = .0014 and P = .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Illness explanations and goals for treatment differ in patients reporting different levels of TMD pain-related disability.

explanatory models of illness; GCPS; primary health care; RDC/TMD Axis II; TMD pain

1. McNeill C. History and evolution of TMD concepts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83;51–60.

2. Greene CS, Laskin DM. Temporomandibular disorders: Moving from a dentally based to a medically based model. J Dent Res 2000;79:1736–1739.

3. Turp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. Dental occlusion: A critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:446–453.

4. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, Könönen M, Dworkin SF. Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular disorders: Towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain 2005;9:613-633.

5. Diatchenko L, Nackley AG, Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Maixner

W. Idiopathic pain disorders—Pathways of vulnerability. Pain 2006;123:226-230.

6. Maixner W. Biopsychological and genetic risk factors for temporomandibular joint disorders and related conditions. In: Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Mense S (eds). Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:263–279.

7. Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, et al. Potential psychosocial risk factors for chronic TMD: Descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study. J Pain 2011;12:T46–T60.

8. Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Sanders AE, et al. Summary of findings from the OPPERA prospective cohort study of incidence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder: Implications and future directions. J Pain 2013;14:T116–T124.

9. Stohler CS, Zarb GA. On the management of temporomandibular disorders: A plea for a low-tech, high-prudence therapeutic approach. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:255–261.

10. Durham J, Ohrbach R. Oral rehabilitation, disability and dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:490–494.

11. Greene CS. Managing TMD patients: Initial therapy is the key. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:43–45.

12. Ohrbach R, List T. Predicting treatment responsiveness: somatic and psychological factors. In: Greene CS, Laskin DM (eds). Treatment of TMDs: Bridging the Gap Between Advances in Research and Clinical Patient Management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2013:91–98.

13. Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF. Five-year outcomes in TMD: Relationship of changes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables. Pain 1998;74:315–326.

14. Benoliel R, Svensson P, Heir GM, et al. Persistent orofacial muscle pain. Oral Dis 2011;17:23–41.

15. Von Korff M, Dunn KM. Chronic pain reconsidered. Pain 2008;138:267–276.

16. Litt MD, Shafer DM, Kreutzer DL. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: Long-term outcomes and moderators of treatment. Pain 2010;151:110–116.

17. Cairns B, List T, Michelotti A, Ohrbach R, Svensson P. JOR-CORE recommendations on rehabilitation of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:481–489.

18. Kotiranta U, Suvinen T, Forssell H. Tailored treatments in temporomandibular disorders: Where are we now? A systematic qualitative literature review. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014; 28:28–37.

19. Kleinman A. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

20. Massoth DL. Explanatory Models for Illness: Applicability of the Construct to the Qualitative and Quantitative Description of Temporomandibular Disorders [thesis]. Seattle: University of Washington, 1992.

21. Massoth DL, Dworkin SF, Whitney CW, Harrison RG, Wilson L, Turner J. Patient explanatory models for temporomandibulardisorders. In: Gebhard GF, Hammond DL, Jensen TS (eds). Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Pain. Progress in painResearch and Management, vol 2. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994.

22. Kotiranta U, Suvinen T, Kauko T, et al. Subtyping primary health care TMD patients based on RDC/TMD Axis II pain related disability: A step towards tailored treatment planning? J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:126–134.

23. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

24. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983;17:33–44.

25. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, Wilson L, et al. A randomised clinical trial using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders -axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care TMD treatment program. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:48–63.

26. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:259–276.

27. Suvinen TI, Kemppainen P, Le Bell Y, Valjakka A, Vahlberg T, Forssell H. Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis II in screening andas a part of biopsychosocial subtyping Finnish patients with tempromandibular disorder pain. J Orofac Pain 2013:27:314–324.

28. Dworkin SF, Massoth DL. Temporomandibular disorders and chronic pain: Disease or illness? J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:29–38.

29. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–149.

30. Manfredini D, Winocur E, Ahlberg J, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F. Psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorders patients. RDC/TMD axis II findings from a multicentre study. J Dentistry 2010;38:765–772.

31. Ozdemir-Karatas M, Peker K, Balik A, Uysal O, Tuncer EB. Identifying potential predictors of pain-related disability in Turkish patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain. J Headache Pain 2013;14:1–17.