Article Data

  • Views 414
  • Dowloads 42

Original Research

Open Access

Transient Pain Following Orthodontic Fixed Appliances Induces Sensitization of Gingival and Periodontal Tissues

  • Dong Lv1
  • Jinglu Zhang2,*,
  • Xinyu Gu3
  • Huijie Shen1
  • Sheng Shao1
  • Wei Hou1
  • Kelun Wang4
  • Peter Svensson5,6
  • Wenjing Chen1,*,

1Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China

2Institute of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China

3Nantong Stomatological Hospital, Nantong, PR China

4Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

5Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

6Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Stockholm, Sweden

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1646 Vol.30,Issue 3,September 2016 pp.228-233

Published: 30 September 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Jinglu Zhang E-mail: 12251389@qq.com

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the transient effects of orthodontic treatment on the mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and mechanical pain threshold (MPT) of the buccal attached gingiva and the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the buccal attached gingiva and of the teeth in two directions (perpendicular and parallel). Methods: A total of 20 patients (15 females and 5 males) aged 18 to 30 years participated in the study. Perceived pain on a 0- to 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) and MDT, MPT, and PPT scores were evaluated at two time points at the masseter muscle, gingiva, teeth, and hand (control) prior to orthodontic treatment (T0) and 24 hours after the first archwire placement (T1). Mean values and SEMs were calculated for all continuous variables. The differences between T0 and T1 of MDT, MPT, and PPT were analyzed by means of a paired Student t test. Results: The pain intensity as assessed on the VAS was 4.2 ± 1.8 cm. No significant changes in MDT or MPT were found at the hand and buccal attached gingiva (P > .06). The PPTs at the buccal attached gingiva of teeth 21, 23, 24, and 34, at teeth 21, 23, 24, and 34 (perpendicular) and at teeth 21 and 23 (parallel) were lower (ie, more sensitive) at T1 compared with T0 (P < .04). Conclusion: This study indicates for the first time that pain following insertion of an archwire causes sensitization to blunt-pressure stimuli both in the attached gingiva and in the periodontal ligament. Quantitative assessment of mechanical sensitivity may provide more insights into procedural pain and allow for better monitoring and evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment in the future.

Keywords

fixed appliances; orthodontics; pain; pressure pain threshold; quantitative sensory testing

Cite and Share

Dong Lv,Jinglu Zhang,Xinyu Gu,Huijie Shen,Sheng Shao,Wei Hou,Kelun Wang,Peter Svensson,Wenjing Chen. Transient Pain Following Orthodontic Fixed Appliances Induces Sensitization of Gingival and Periodontal Tissues. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2016. 30(3);228-233.

References

1. Abdelrahman RSh, Al-Nimri KS, Al Maaitah EF. Pain experience during initial alignment with three types of nickel-titanium archwires: A prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2015;85: 1021–1026.

2. Abu Alhaija ES, Aldaikki A, Al-Omairi MK, Al-Khateeb SN. The relationship between personality traits, pain perception and attitude toward orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80:1141–1149.

3. Abtahi SM, Mousavi SA, Shafaee H, Tanbakuchi B. Effect of low-level laser therapy on dental pain induced by separator force in orthodontic treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:647–651.

4. Beck VJ, Farella M, Chandler NP, Kieser JA, Thomson WM. Factors associated with pain induced by orthodontic separators. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:282–288.

5. Magalhães IB, Pereira LJ, Andrade AS, Gouvea DB, Gameiro GH. The influence of fixed orthodontic appliances on masticatory and swallowing threshold performances. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:897–903.

6. Saito I, Hanada K, Maeda T. Alteration of nerve growth factor-receptor expression in the periodontal ligament of the rat during experimental tooth movement. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:923–929.

7. Ngan P, Wilson S, Shanfeld J, Amini H. The effect of ibuprofen on the level of discomfort in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:88–95.

8. Loescher AR, al-Emran S, Sullivan PG, Robinson PP. Characteristics of periodontal mechanoreceptors supplying cat canine teeth which have sustained orthodontic forces. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:663–669.

9. Fernández-Carnero J, La Touche R, Ortega-Santiago R, et al. Short-term effects of dry needling of active myofascial trigger points in the masseter muscle in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:106–112.

10. Campos MJ, Fraga MR, Raposo NR, Ferreira AP, Vitral RW. Assessment of pain experience in adults and children after bracket bonding and initial archwire insertion. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:32–37.

11. Campos MJ, Vitral RW. The influence of patient’s motivation on reported pain during orthodontic treatment. Dental Press JOrthod 2013;18:80–85.

12. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

13. Ogimoto T, Ogawa T, Sumiyoshi K, Matsuka Y, Koyano K. Pressure-pain threshold determination in the oral mucosa: Validity and reliability. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:620–626.

14. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in oro-facial pain conditions--A taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:366–394.

15. Hansson P, Backonja M, Bouhassira D. Usefulness and limitations of quantitative sensory testing: Clinical and research application in neuropathic pain states. Pain 2007;129:256–259.

16. McMillan AS. Pain-pressure threshold in human gingivae. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:44–50.

17. Liu R, Gu X, Zhang J, et al. Test-retest reliability of a new technique with pressure algometry applied to teeth in healthy Chinese individuals. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124:259–265.

18. Michelotti A, Farella M, Martina R. Sensory and motor changes of the human jaw muscles during induced orthodontic pain. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:397–404.

19. Matos R, Wang K, Jensen JD, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the trigeminal region: Site and gender differences. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:161–169.

20. Tanaka M, Ogimoto T, Koyano K, Ogawa T. Denture wearing and strong bite force reduce pressure pain threshold of edentulous oral mucosa. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:873–878.

21. Jones ML. An investigation into the initial discomfort caused by placement of an archwire. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:48–54.

22. Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:47–53.

23. Liao L, Long H, Zhang L, et al. Evaluation of pain in rats through facial expression following experimental tooth movement.Eur J Oral Sci 2014;122:121–124.

24. Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The rat as a model for orthodontic tooth movement--a critical review and a proposed solution. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:483–490.

25. Sood M, Bhatt P, Sessle BJ. Mechanical and thermal hypersensitivities associated with orthodontic tooth movement: A behavioral rat model for orthodontic tooth movement-induced pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29:60–69.

26. Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Soneda K, Farella M, Møller

E. Ultrasonographic assessment of the swelling of the human masseter muscle after static and dynamic activity. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:133–140.

27. Ogawa T, Tanaka M, Ogimoto T, Okushi N, Koyano K, Takeuchi

K. Mapping, profiling and clustering of pressure pain threshold (PPT) in edentulous oral mucosa. J Dent 2004;32:219–228.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top